Abstract
This study uses data from two independent surveys of three communities in Colorado and Wyoming in 1997 and 2012 and examines how environmental attitudes and beliefs (as measured by the New Environmental Paradigm Scale) are related to support for a range of environmental policies and self-reported environmental actions. Results of structural equation modeling show that policy support mediates the influences of the NEP on environmental action, compatible with the value-belief-norm theory. In addition, this study finds a weaker relationship between policy support and environmental action in 2012 than 1997, indicating that environmental beliefs play an increasingly weaker role over time in the decision of individuals to engage in environmental actions. Community comparisons suggest that recycling infrastructure may be a significant facilitator for environmental actions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson M (2012) The New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) Scale. The Berkshire Encyclopedia of sustainability: measurements, indicators, and research methods for sustainability. Berkshire Publishing Group
Augustinack AM (1992) A structural analysis of recycling attitudes and behavior: a comparison of Minneapolis, MN and Des Moines, IA, Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 16921
Aydos EH, Yagci E (2015) Examination of the teacher candidates’ environmental attitudes via New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) scale in terms of different variables. J Educ Sci Environ Health 1(1):20–27
Brick, C., & Lai, C. K. (2018). Explicit (but not implicit) environmentalist identity predicts pro-environmental behavior and policy preferences. J Environ Psychol, 58: 8–17
Buhrmann J (1998) The impact of social context on environmental attitudes, behaviors, and the attitude/behavior relationship: an analysis applying Schutz’ concept of multiple realities, Dissertation Abstracts International, A59/06
Chen M (2015) An examination of the value-belief-norm theory model in predicting pro-environmental behaviour in Taiwan. Asian J Soc Psychol 18(2):145–151
Cordano M, Welcomer SA, Scherer RF (2003) An analysis of the predictive validity of the new ecological paradigm scale. J Environ Educ 34(3):22–28
Corral-Verdugo V, Armendariz LI (2000) The ‘new environmental paradigm’ in a Mexican community. J Environ Educ 31(3):25–31
Dunlap RE (2008) The new environmental paradigm scale: from marginality to worldwide use. J Environ Educ 40(1):3–10
Dunlap RE, Van Liere K (1978) The new environmental paradigm. J Environ Educ 9(4):10–19
Dunlap RE, York R (2008) The globalisation of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: evidence for four multinational surveys. Sociol Q 49:529–563
Fielding KS, Hornsey MJ (2016) A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: insights and opportunities. Front Psychol 7:121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
Francis G (2014) Ecosystem management. Nat Resour J 2:316
Hamilton LC, Hartter J, Lemcke-Stampone M, Moore DW, Safford TG (2015) Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PLoS One 10(9):1–14
Hansla A, Gärling T, Biel A (2013) Attitude toward environmental policy measures related to value orientation. J Appl Soc Psychol 43:582–590
Hawcroft LJ, Milfont T (2010) The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 30:143–158
Heberlein TA (2012) Navigating environmental attitudes. Conserv Biol 26:583–585
Hernández B, Suárez E, Corral-Verdugo V, Hess S (2012) The relationship between social and environmental interdependence as an explanation of proenvironmental behavior. Hum Ecol Rev 19(1):1–9
Hines RI (2015) The price of pollution: the struggle for environmental justice in Mossville, Louisiana. West J Black Stud 39(3):198–208
Hoover E, Renauld M, Edelstein MR, Brown P p (2015) Social science collaboration with environmental health. Environ Health Perspect 123(11):1100–1106
Hunter LM, Hatch A, & Johnson A (2004) “Cross-National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors.” Social Science Quarterly 85(3): 677–694
Jagers SC, Martinsson J, Matti S (2016) The environmental psychology of the ecological citizen: comparing competing models of pro-environmental behavior. Soc Sci Q 97(5):1005–1022
Johnson B, Manoli CC (2011) The 2-MEV Scale in the United States: a measure of children’s environmental attitudes based on the theory of ecological attitude. J Environ Educ 42(2):84–97
Kaiser FG, Schultz PW (2009) The attitude–behavior relationship: a test of three models of the moderating role of behavioral difficulty. J Appl Soc Psychol 39(1):186–207
Kennedy EH, Beckley TM, McFarlane BL, Nadeau S (2009) Why we don’t “walk the talk”: understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Hum Ecol Rev 16(2):151–160
Kim S, Shin W (2017) Understanding American and Korean students’ support for pro-environmental tax policy: the application of the value–belief–norm theory of environmentalism. Environ Commun 11(3):311–331
Kyselá E (2015) Acceptability of environmental policies in the Czech Republic: a comparison with willingness to make economic sacrifices. Sociálni Studia / Soc Stud 12(3):179–198
Martin M, Williams I, Clark M (2006) Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 48:357–395
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52(2):155–194
Nielsen JMC, Ellington BL (1983) Social processes and resource conservation: a case study in low technology recycling. J Environ Educ 19:38–41
Nigbur D, Lyons E, Uzzell D (2010) Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. Br J Soc Psychol 49(2):259–284
Noblet CL, Anderson M, Teisl MF (2013) An empirical test of anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics. Environ Educ Res 19(4):540–551
Oates CJ, McDonald S (2006) Recycling and the domestic division of labour: is green pink or blue? Sociology 40(3):417–433
Pierce JC, Lovrich NP, Tsurutani T, Abe T (1987) Culture, politics and mass publics: traditional and modern supporters of the new environmental paradigm in Japan and the United States. J Polit 49(1):54–79
Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley, New York
Schultz WP, Oskamp S (1996) Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship: general environmental concern and recycling. Soc Psychol Q 59(4):375–383
Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 10. Academic Press, New York
Skumatz L (2008) Pay as you throw, Colorado municipalities
Stern PC, Dietz T, Guagnano GA (1995) The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environ Behav 27(6):723–743
Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel TD, Guagnano GA, Kalof L (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6(2):81–97
Thapa B (2010) The mediation effect of outdoor recreation participation on environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. J Environ Educ 41(3):133–150
Thomas C, Sharp V (2013) Understanding the normalisation of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours: a review of social norms and recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 79:11–20
Truelove HB, Yeung KL, Carrico AR, Gillis AJ, Raimi KT (2016) From plastic bottle recycling to policy support: an experimental test of pro-environmental spillover. J Environ Psychol:4655–4666
Viscusi WK, Huber J, Bell J (2011) Promoting recycling: private values, social norms, and economic incentives. Am Econ Rev 101(3):65–70
Xiao C, Dunlap RE (2007) Validating a comprehensive model of environmental concern cross-nationally: a U.S.-Canadian comparison. Soc Sci Q 88:471–493
Xiao C, McCright AM (2015) Gender differences in environmental concern: revisiting the institutional trust hypothesis in the USA. Environ Behav 47(1):17–37
Xu X, Sylwester K (2016) Environmental quality and international migration. Kyklos 69(1):157–180
Zhou N, Huang J, Wei T (2017) Interactive effects of perceived social exclusion and self-construal on recycling behavior. Soc Behav Personal 45(3):491–503
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, C., Buhrmann, J. Ideas to action: environmental beliefs, behaviors, and support for environmental policies. J Environ Stud Sci 9, 196–205 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00541-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00541-4