Conserving nostalgia: exploring private land protection patterns

Abstract

The dramatic loss of open space in the USA over the last 50 years has led to increased conservation efforts by public, private, and non-profit entities. Amongst private landowners, conservation easements, or conditions written into a property’s title that permanently limit how it may be used, are a popular form of land protection. Private land protection is vital for both the conservation of America’s characteristic open spaces, and to ensure the future of many threatened and endangered plant and animal species. Yet little is known about the people who are placing conservation easements on their properties, the landscape features and land use practices currently being protected under conservation easements, or the ways in which these conservation patterns will continue into the future. Regardless, private land conservation efforts are shaping the American landscape; therefore, a thorough understanding of their characteristics is needed. Given that nostalgia, or an idealized and simplified notion of the past, underlies many of the motivations private landowners have for protecting their properties, this study suggests that there is a link between the type of nostalgia motivating private land protection and the types of land and land use practices being conserved. Further, the authors contend that this phenomenon is worthy of further investigation given its potential for environmental, social, and economic impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Babbie E (2014) The basics of social research. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blair S (1998) Cultural geography and the place of the literary. Am Lit Hist 10(3):544–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bronstein S, Griffin D, Richards C (2017) Interior secretary pushing controversial road project. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/10/politics/alaska-izembek-road-zinke-invs/index.html

  4. Bruckner M, Hsu HL (eds) (2007) American literary geographies. University of Delaware Press, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byerly A (1996) The uses of the landscape: the picturesque and the National Park System. In: Fromm H, Glotfelty C (eds) The ecocriticism reader: landmarks in literary ecology. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheever F (1996) Public good and private magic in the law of land trusts and conservation easements: a happy present and a troubled future. Denver Law Review 73:1077–1102

    Google Scholar 

  7. Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among the five approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cruel S (2017) Dakota access pipeline in operation after months of resistance. PBS News Hour. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/dakota-access-pipeline-operation-months-resistance

  9. Curry TA, Reid RA (2017) Trump is being sued to keep him from shrinking Bear Ears national monument by 85 percent. Who will win? The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/12/11/trump-is-being-sued-to-stop-him-from-shrinking-bears-ears-national-monument-by-85-percent-who-will-win/?utm_term=.8f73c50e1d2b

  10. Davis F (1979) Yearning for yesterday: a sociology of nostalgia. Free Press

  11. Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic motivation. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drost D, Long G, Wilson D, Miller B (1996) Barriers to adopting sustainable agriculture practices. J Ext 34(6):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duncan JS, Duncan NG (2001) The Aestheticization of the politics of landscape preservation. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91:387–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellingson T (2001) The myth of the noble savage. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ernest T, Wallace GN (2008) Characteristics, motivations and management actions of landowners in private land conservation in Larimer County Colorado. Nat Areas J 28(2):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farmer JR, Chancellor C, Fischer BC (2011a) Motivations for using conservation easements as a land protection mechanism: a mixed methods analysis. Nat Areas J 31(1):80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farmer J, Knapp D, Meretsky VJ, Chancellor C, Fischer BC (2011b) Motivations influencing the adoption of conservation easements. Conserv Biol 25(4):827–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feinberg PB (1997) An evaluation of landowner satisfaction with conservation restrictions. Thesis for the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry

  19. Frost W, Hall CM (2009) Tourism and national parks: international perspectives, developments, histories, and change. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goulding C (2002) An exploratory study of age related vicarious nostalgia and aesthetic consumption. Adv Consum Res 29:542–546

    Google Scholar 

  21. Graf WL (1993) Landscapes, commodities, and ecosystems: the relationship between policy and science for American rivers. In Sustaining our water resources: water science and technology board symposium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

  22. Halfacre A (2015) Nostalgia as a catalyst for conservation in the Carolina Lowcountry. J Environ Stud Sci 6:774–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Holak SL, Havlena WJ (1998) Feelings, fantasies, and memories: an examination of the emotional components of nostalgia. J Bus Res 42:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holbrook MB (1993) Nostalgia and consumption preferences: some emerging patterns of consumer tastes. J Consum Res 20:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu HL (2005) Literature and regional production. Am Lit Hist 19(1):36–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kabii T, Horwitz P (2006) A review of landholder motivations and determinants for participation in conservation covenanting programmes. Environ Conserv 33(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiesecker JM, Comendant T, Grandmason T, Gray E, Hall C, Hilsenbek R, Kareiva P, Lozier L, Naehu P, Rissman A, Shaw MR, Zankel M (2007) Conservation easements in context: a quantitative analysis of their use by The Nature Conservancy. Front Ecol Environ 5(3):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Land Trust Alliance (2017) 2015 Land Trust Census [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.landtrustalliance.org/land-trusts/land-trust-census/2010-final-report

  29. Lefebvre H (1992) The production of space. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lowenthal D (1985) The past is a foreign country. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lowenthal D (1998) The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mandler P (1997) Against ‘Englishness’: English culture and the limits to rural nostalgia, 1850–1940. Trans R Hist Soc 7:155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McLaughlin NA (2004) Increasing the tax incentives for conservation easement donations: a responsible approach. Ecol Law Quart 31(1):1–115

    Google Scholar 

  34. Merchant C (2007) American environmental history: an introduction. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Merenlender AM, Huntsinger L, Guthey G, Fairfax S (2002) Land trusts and conservation easements: who is conserving what for whom? Conserv Biol 18(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Morrisette PM (2001) Conservation easements and the public good: preserving the environment on private lands. Nat Resour J 4(2):373–426

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moustakas C (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  38. National Park Service (2017) About us. National Park Service. Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/index.htm

  39. Ochterski JA (1996) Why land is protected: motivations underlying real estate donations to land conservancies. Unpublished master’s thesis. School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan

  40. Oravec C (1981) John Muir, Yosemite, and the sublime response: a study in the rhetoric of preservation. Q J Speech 67(3):245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rilla E, Sokolow AD, Kozloff R, Lemp C (2000) California farmers and conservation easements: motivations, experiences, and perceptions in three counties. Research Paper # 4. University of California Agricultural Issues Center

  42. Runte A (1997) National parks: the American experience. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ryden KC (1999) Writing the Midwest: history, literature, and regional identity. Geogr Rev 89(4):511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sauer CO (1925) The morphology of the landscape. University of California Publications in Geography. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schama S (1996) Landscape and memory. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Soja EW (1989) Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sokolow AD (2002) Agricultural easements limited geographically. Calif Agric 56(1):15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Spaulding J (1998) Ansel Adams and the American landscape: a biography. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stern PC (1993) A second environmental science: Human–environment interactions. Science 260(5116):1897–1899

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stokowski PA (2002) Languages of place and discourses of power: constructing new senses of place. J Leis Res 34(4):368–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Strohmeier G (1997) Wild west imagery: landscape perception in nineteenth-century America. In: Teich M, Porter R, Gustafsson B (eds) Nature and society in historical context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  52. Taun YF (1974) Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  53. The Nature Conservancy (n.d.) Conservation easements: all about conservation easements. Retrieved from https://www.nature.org/about-us/private-lands-conservation/conservation-easements/all-about-conservation-easements.xml

  54. Timothy DJ (2011) Cultural and heritage tourism: an introduction. Channel View, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tyler N, Ligibel TJ, Tyler IR (2009) Historic preservation: an introduction to its history, principles and practice. W.W. Norton & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  56. U.S.D.A. (United States Department of Agriculture) Natural Resources Conservation Service (2007) Major uses of land in the United States, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/177328/eib89_reportsummary.pdf

  57. USFWS (United States Department of Fish and Wildlife Services) (n.d.) Threatened and endangered species and the private landowner. Retrieved from https://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/wildlife/endangered/endangered.htm

  58. Wilson A (1992) The culture of nature: North American landscape from Disney to the Exxon Valdez. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alana N. Seaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seaman, A.N., Farmer, J.R., Chancellor, H.C. et al. Conserving nostalgia: exploring private land protection patterns. J Environ Stud Sci 9, 122–132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0500-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Private land conservation
  • Land donation
  • Nostalgia
  • Land protection
  • Conservation easements