Environmental engagement in troubled times: a manifesto


These are troubled times: our scholarly efforts in environmental studies and sciences seem under assault on all fronts. Yet we argue not just for environmental action, but for greater emphasis on environmental engagement as a foundation for effective action. The etymology of engagement suggests connection, commitment, and communication—a risky yet indispensable ingredient of effective action. We exemplify this approach to environmental engagement in four contexts of increasing scope: within our environmental studies and sciences community, across the college campus, among our fellow Americans, and at the global scale. In all such contexts, engagement is no end-run around conflict; it is political just like any form of action. Yet by engaging, we can be the environmental leadership that is so plainly missing and desperately needed to produce meaningful change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    See aessonline.org/aess-listserv. Please contact the authors for further information on this analysis.

  2. 2.

    See ds.lclark.edu/ecotypes.

  3. 3.

    See narrative4.com

  4. 4.

    See publicphilosophyjournal.org; modesofexistence.org

  5. 5.

    See www.inaturalist.org; www.natureforall.global


  1. Arendt H (1970) On violence. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck U (2006) Cosmopolitan vision. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beck U (2010) Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theor Cult Soc 27:254–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brick PD, Snow D, van de Wetering S (2001) Across the great divide: explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  5. Brooks D (2018) Respect first, then gun control. The New York Times

  6. Chaloupka, W (2002) The tragedy of the ethical commons: demoralizing environmentalism. In: Bennett J, Shapiro MJ The politics of moralizing. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 113–140

  7. Chapman RL (2007) How to think about environmental studies. J Philos Educ 41:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Charnley S, Sheridan T, Nabhan G (eds) (2014) Stitching the West back together: conservation of working landscapes. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clark SG, Rutherford MB, Auer MR, Cherney DN, Wallace RL, Mattson DJ, Clark DA, Foote L, Krogman N, Wilshusen P, Steelman T (2011a) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 2): strategies for improvement. Environ Manag 47:716–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9635-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark SG, Rutherford MB, Auer MR, Cherney DN, Wallace RL, Mattson DJ, Clark DA, Foote L, Krogman N, Wilshusen P, Steelman T (2011b) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 1): integrating knowledge, education, and action for a better world? Environ Manag 47:701–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9619-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooke SJ, Vermaire JC (2015) Environmental studies and environmental science today: inevitable mission creep and integration in action-oriented transdisciplinary areas of inquiry, training and practice. J Environ Stud Sci 5:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0220-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cruz S (2017) The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 53:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foa RS, Mounk Y (2016) The democratic disconnect. J Democr 27:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heise UK (2008) Sense of place and sense of planet. Oxford UP, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kahan D (2014) Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Advances in. Polit Psychol 36:1–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy EB, Ho J (2015) Discursive diversity in introductory environmental studies. J Environ Stud Sci 5:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0245-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Latour B (2004) Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Common Knowl 10:450–462. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-10-3-450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Latour B (2015) Waiting for Gaia. Composing the common world through art and politics. In: Yaneva A, Zaera-Polo A (eds) What is Cosmopolitical design? Ashgate, Farnham, pp 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lovell J (2014) The tale of two schools. New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/05/04/magazine/tale-of-two-schools.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  20. Maniates MF (2013) Teaching for turbulence. In: State of the world 2013. Springer, pp 255–268

  21. Maniates MF, Whissel JC (2000) Environmental studies: the sky is not falling. Bioscience 50:509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moeller, E (2017) New dialogue: campus conservatives address climate change. The Concordian. http://theconcordian.org/2017/04/20/new-dialogue-campus-conservatives-address-climate-change. Accessed on 26 Nov 2017

  23. New J (2016) Civic learning. Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/05/10/colleges-placing-increasing-importance-programs-promoting-civic-engagement. Accessed 26 Nov 2017

  24. Nisbet MC (2014) Disruptive ideas: public intellectuals and their arguments for action on climate change. WIREs Clim Chang 5:809–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. OED Online (2017) Engagement, n. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/62197?redirectedFrom=engagement. accessed 2 Dec, 2017

  26. Partzsch L (2017) ‘Power with’ and ‘power to’ in environmental politics and the transition to sustainability. Environ Polit 26:193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Proctor JD (2015a) Replacing nature in environmental studies and sciences. J Environ Stud Sci 6:748–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0259-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Proctor JD (2015b) Theory in, theory out: NCSE and the ESS curriculum. J Environ Stud Sci 5:218–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0237-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Proctor JD (2017) Ecotypes: creative tensions in environmental ideas. Association for Environmental Studies and Sciences Annual Meeting, Tuscon AZ 24 June

  30. Proctor JD, Clark SG, Smith KK, Wallace RL (2013) A manifesto for theory in environmental studies and sciences. J Environ Stud Sci 3:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0122-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Proctor JD, Bernstein J, Wallace RL (2015) Introduction: unsettling the ESS curriculum. J Environ Stud Sci 5:195–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0253-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Robbins P, Moore SA (2015) Teaching through objects: grounding environmental studies in things. J Environ Stud Sci 5:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0242-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodrik D (2017) Populism and the economics of globalization. NBER Working Paper No. 23559. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23559

  34. Romero A, Silveri P (2006) Not all are created equal: an analysis of the environmental programs/departments in US academic institutions from 1900 until May 2005. Journal of Integr Biol 1:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sheridan TE, Sayre NF, Seibert D (2014) Beyond “stakeholders”: and the zero-sum game. In: Charnley S, Sheridan T, Nabhan G (eds) Stitching the West back together: conservation of working landscapes. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 53–75

    Google Scholar 

  36. Singer P (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. Philos Public Aff 1:229–243

    Google Scholar 

  37. Singer P (2002) One world. Yale UP, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  38. Soulé ME, Press D (1998) What is environmental studies? Bioscience 48:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stengers I (2010) Cosmopolitics. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stengers I (2011) Cosmopolitics II. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stephens B (2018) Free speech and the necessity of discomfort. The New York Times

  42. Villotti L, Brethauer WK (2013) Predicting the future? Public Roads 77

  43. Vincent S, Focht W (2010) In search of common ground: exploring identity and core competencies for interdisciplinary environmental programs. Environ Pract 12:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vincent S, Roberts JT, Mulkey S (2015) Interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability education: islands of progress in a sea of dysfunction. J Environ Stud Sci 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0279-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Weber EP (2003) Bringing society back in: grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  46. Weinberg, Adam (2017) Promoting civic agency and free speech on college campuses. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/civic-agency-and-free-speech-on-college-campuses_us_58a4ad3be4b080bf74f0439e. Accessed 26 Nov 2017

Download references


We wish to honor input and inspiration provided by our colleagues as part of ongoing face to face and digital conversations on engagement, and via a set of environmental engagement workshops and presentation panels held at the Association for Environmental Studies & Sciences Annual Conference, June 2017, University of Arizona. We also appreciate the helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D. Proctor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Proctor, J.D., Bernstein, J., Brick, P. et al. Environmental engagement in troubled times: a manifesto. J Environ Stud Sci 8, 362–367 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0484-7

Download citation


  • Engagement
  • Activism
  • Politics
  • Environmental studies and sciences
  • Higher education
  • United States
  • Globalism