The challenge of coordinated civic climate change education

  • Peter Buckland
  • Eban Goodstein
  • Rob Alexander
  • Barry Muchnick
  • Mary Ellen Mallia
  • Neil Leary
  • Rob Andrejewski
  • Susannah Barsom
Article

Abstract

Many sustainability educators want to more effectively engage their students with climate policy. They also seek to support students’ civic and change agent skills and dispositions to take on critical social, economic, and environmental challenges that require collective action. Training young people for civic leadership and collective action is integral to the mission of higher education and part of achieving that mission has been to share success stories. This article shares anecdotal but research-informed reflections on the Power Dialog, a twenty-state, multi-month, civically minded, coordinated climate change educational program developed for college students to provide input to state governments on the Clean Power Plan. The Power Dialog was crafted on theories and practices of democratic education, behavioral economics, policy theory, and up-to-date climate science and risk assessments. This reflection shows that factors in state government, strong interinstitutional networks and leadership, and programs inside of the universities themselves were critical for success. The article concludes by recognizing that the national, state, and local political landscapes have shifted with the Trump administration and educators will need to respond accordingly.

Keywords

Behavioral economics Civic engagement Climate change education Coordinated education Education for sustainability Energy policy Policy window 

References

  1. Akadjian D (2015) 7 things our founders believe about public education. Daily Kos. Accessed from: https://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/1/27/1360440/-7-things-our-founders-believed-about-public-education
  2. Alliance for Climate Education (2016) What We Do. Accessed from: https://acespace.org/what-we-do Google Scholar
  3. Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (2018). Who We Are. Accessed from http://www.aashe.org/about-us/who-we-are/ Google Scholar
  4. Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE) (2006) Research on outcomes and processes of intergroup dialogue. Higher Education Report 32(4):59–73Google Scholar
  5. Bell DR (2005) Liberal environmental citizenship. Environ Politics 14(2):179–194.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010500054863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berke J (2017) More than 50 US mayors just signed a charter to meet the Paris Agreement goals without Trump. Business Insider. Accessed from: http://www.businessinsider.com/paris-agreement-2-year-anniversary-us-mayors-step-up-2017-12
  7. Brown D (2013) Climate change ethics: navigating the perfect moral storm. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Citizens Climate Lobby (2017) Carbon fee and dividend policy & FAQs. Accessed from: https://citizensclimatelobby.org/carbon-fee-and-dividend/
  9. Colby A, Ehrlich T, Beaumont E, Stephens J (2003) Educating citizens: preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Cusick M (2016) Despite legal limbo, Pennsylvania continues work on Clean Power Plan. State Impact PA. Accessed from https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2016/04/05/despite-legal-limbo-pennsylvania-continues-work-on-clean-power-plan/
  11. Democratic Part (2016) Democratic Party Platform. Accessed from: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/papers_pdf/117717.pdf
  12. de Vogue A (2016) Appeals court hears high-stakes challenge to Obama’s clean power plan. CNN Politics. Accessed from http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/27/politics/clean-power-plan-obama/
  13. Dewey J (1927) The public and its problems. Swallow Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  14. Engle E, Barsom S, Vandenbergh L, Sterner G, & Alter T (2016) An exploration of competencies in sustainability: working paper 2014–2015. Accessed from http://sustainability.psu.edu/fieldguide/resources/engle-e-barsom-s-vandenbergh-l-sterner-g-alter-t-2016-an-exploration-of-competencies-in-sustainability-working-paper-2014-2015/
  15. Environmental Protection Agency (2016) Clean Power Plan: state at a glance: Maryland. Accessed from https://archive.epa.gov/epa/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/maryland.pdf
  16. Garvey J (2008) The ethics of climate change: right and wrong in a warming world. Continuum International Publishing Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Governor’s Press Office (2016) Governor Cuomo announces establishment of clean energy standard that mandates 50 percent renewables by 2030. Accessed from https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-announces-establishment-clean-energy-standard-mandates-50-percent-renewables
  18. Gurin P, Nagda BA, Sorenson N (2011) Intergroup dialogue: education for a broad conception of civic engagement. Lib Educ 97(2):46–51Google Scholar
  19. Hauer ME, Evans JM, & Mishra DR (2016) Millions projected to be at risk from sea-level rise in the continental United States. Nat Clim ChangeGoogle Scholar
  20. Heath C, Heath D (2012) Switch: how to change things when change is hard. Broadway Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Henderson J, Long D, Berger P, Russell C, & Drewes A (forthcoming) Expanding the foundation: Climate change and opportunities for educational research. Educ StudGoogle Scholar
  22. Inglis B (2013) Changing the dialogue on energy and climate: Bob Inglis at TEDxJacksonville. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUmcnxIQU24 Google Scholar
  23. Jacoby, Barbara and Associates (2009) Civic engagement in higher education: concepts and practices. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnston L, Collins B, Boyle A, Womack HD (2012) Looking at sustainability through a different LENS. Sustainability 5(4):244–247.  https://doi.org/10.1089/sus.2012.9943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 2(10):732–735.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keast R, Brown K, Mandell M (2007) Getting the right mix: unpacking integration meanings and strategies. Int Public Manag J 10(1):9–33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490601185716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kenward A, Sanford T and Bronzan J (2016) Western wildfires: a fiery future. Climate Central. Accessed from http://assets.climatecentral.org/pdfs/westernwildfires2016v2.pdf
  28. Kingdon JW (1995) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. London S (2010) Doing democracy: how a network of grassroots organizations is strengthening community, building capacity, and shaping a new kind of civic education. Kettering Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Maniates MF (2001) Individualization: plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global Environ Polit 1(3):31–52.  https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001316881395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mann M (2012) The hockey stick and the climate wars: dispatches from the front lines. Columbia University Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.7312/mann15254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLendon MK, Cohen-Vogel L (2008) Understanding education policy change in the American states: lessons from political science. In: Cooper BS, Cibulka JG, Fusarelli LD (eds) The handbook of education politics and policy. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 30–51Google Scholar
  33. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52(2):155–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Milman O (2017) The Republicans who care about climate change: ‘They are done with the denial’. The Guardian. Accessed from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/apr/27/climate-solutions-caucus-republicans-trump
  35. National Commission on Civic Renewal (1998) A nation of spectators: how civic disengagement weakens America and what we can do about it. National Commission on Civic Renewal, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  36. National Wildlife Federation (2016) Campus ecology. Accessed from: http://www.nwf.org/campus-ecology.aspx
  37. Natural Resources Defense Council (2016) The road from Paris: the United States progress toward its climate pledge. Accessed from: https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/paris-climate-conference-US-IB.pdf
  38. Oreskes N, Conway E (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Orr David (2004) Earth in mind: on education, environment, and the human prospect. 10th Anniversary Edition. Washington, D.C.: Island PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Penn State University (2016) Our Commitment to Impact. The Pennsylvania State University’s Strategic Plan for 2016–2020Google Scholar
  41. Peters SJ, Alter TR, Schwartzback N (2010) Democracy and higher education. Michigan State University Press, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  42. Powell JL (2011) The inquisition of climate science. Columbia University Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.7312/powe15718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. President’s Commission on Higher Education (1947) Higher education for American democracy, volume 1, establishing the goals. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  44. Raworth K (2017) Doughnut economics: 7 ways to think like a 21st century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River JunctionGoogle Scholar
  45. republic[En] (2017) Environmental tax reform. Accessed from: http://www.republicen.org/taxreform
  46. Risky Business (2017) From risk to return: investing in a clean energy economy. Accessed from: http://riskybusiness.org/site/assets/uploads/sites/5/2016/10/RBP-FromRiskToReturn-WEB.pdf
  47. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Stuart Chapin F, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scobey D (2010) Across: heterogeneity of civic education. In: Smith MB, Nowacek RS, Bernstein JL (eds) Citizenship across the curriculum. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 185–198Google Scholar
  49. Second Nature (2018) Climate Leadership Statement. Accessed from http://secondnature.org/wp-content/uploads/Climate-Commitment-2017-Second-Nature.pdf Google Scholar
  50. Shriberg M and MacDonald L (2013) Sustainability leadership programs: emerging goals, methods & best practices. J Sustain Educ 5. Accessed from http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/content/sustainability-leadership-programs-emerging-goals-methods-best-practices_2013_06/
  51. Shortle J, Abler D, Blumsack S, Britson A, Fang K, Kemanian A, Knight P, McDill M, Najjar R, Nassry M, Ready R, Ross A, Rydzik M, Shen C, Wang S, Wardrop D, and Yetter S (2015) Pennsylvania climate impacts assessment update: May 2015. Environment and Natural Resources Institute. Penn State University. Accessed from http://www.elibrary.dep.state.pa.us/dsweb/Get/Document-108470/2700-BK-DEP4494.pdf
  52. Smith W, Litzky B, Fadigan K (2015) The pursuit of pura vida in the educational experience. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 26:212–219.  https://doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc20152619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thayer-Bacon B (2004) An exploration of Myles Horton’s democratic praxis: highlander folk school. J Educ Found 18(2):5 Retrieved from http://ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1468389644?accountid=13158 Google Scholar
  54. The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement (2012) A crucible moment: college learning and democracy’s future. Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  55. US Census Bureau (2013) Current population survey, November 2013: civic engagement supplement file. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/technical-documentation/complete.2013.html
  56. Virginia’s Legislative Information System (2016) HB 2 Clean Power Plan; state implementation plan, General Assembly approval. Accessed from https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?161+sum+HB2
  57. We Are Still In (2017) Homepage. Accessed from: https://www.wearestillin.com

Copyright information

© AESS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Buckland
    • 1
  • Eban Goodstein
    • 2
  • Rob Alexander
    • 3
  • Barry Muchnick
    • 4
  • Mary Ellen Mallia
    • 5
  • Neil Leary
    • 6
  • Rob Andrejewski
    • 7
  • Susannah Barsom
    • 8
  1. 1.Sustainability Institute and Department of Educational Theory and PolicyPenn State UniversityState CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Bard Center for Environmental PolicyAnnandale-on-HudsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceJames Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA
  4. 4.Department of Environmental StudiesSt. Mary’s College of MarylandSt. Mary’s CityUSA
  5. 5.Office for SustainabilityUniversity at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  6. 6.Center for Sustainability Education, Dickinson CollegeCarlisleUSA
  7. 7.University of RichmondRichmondUSA
  8. 8.School of Earth, Energy & Environmental SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations