Advertisement

From appropriate technology to the clean energy economy: renewable energy and environmental politics since the 1970s

  • Sarah Mittlefehldt
Article

Abstract

Although many people think of the current transition to a lower carbon economy as a process that has just begun, this movement has historical roots. This paper examines how different ideological and political frameworks shaped the development of renewable technologies in the USA since the energy crises of the 1970s. Public discourse about renewable energy embodied conflicting ideas about how to manage natural resources and different plans for distributing political power in society. Questions about the appropriate role of government in shaping energy futures also influenced the politics of renewable technologies. Illuminating the hidden ideological and political dynamics that surrounded energy policy in this formative era helps us to see the barriers involved in our current energy transition as part of a broader historical continuum. By revealing how different political and environmental goals shaped—and in some ways limited—the transition away from fossil fuels in the late twentieth century, this research demonstrates the importance of history for thinking about current sustainability challenges.

Keywords

Historical perspective Energy transitions Renewable technology Environmental politics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Kim Smith for organizing this symposium on American Environmental Politics in Historic Perspective.

References

  1. Berlik MM, Kittredge DB, Foster DR (2002) The illusion of preservation: a global environmental argument for the local production of natural resources. J Biogeogr 29(10-11):1557–1568.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00768.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley MJ (2011) American Lung Association energy policy development: summary. Am Lung Assoc, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bookchin M (1964) Ecology and revolutionary thought. New Directions in Libertarian Thought, SeptGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlisle JE, Feezell JT, Michaud KE, Smith E (2017) The politics of energy crises. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter J (1977) National energy plan: address to the nation. Nov 8 http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=6904
  7. Cheek GC (1978) Understanding public opinion about forest and forestry. Society of American Foresters Collection, Forest History Society Archives, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  8. Clusen C (1979). R.E. energy legislation, August 7, 1979. FF18_Richard W. VanWagenen_Energy_clippings_1979-81, n.d., Series 1_Box 8, Wilderness Society Records, Denver Public LibraryGoogle Scholar
  9. Commoner B (1980) The transition to renewable resources. In: Courrier K (ed) Life after 80: environmental choices we can live with. Brick House Publishing, Andover, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Crosby AW (2006) Children of the sun: a history of humanity’s unappeasable appetite for energy. WW Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis MJ, Svendsgaard DJ (1987) Lead and child development. Nature 329(6137):297–300.  https://doi.org/10.1038/329297a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis KP (1971) President’s statement. Society of American Foresters to the Senate Subcommittee on Public Lands, Washington D.C. April 5-7. Society of American Foresters Collection, Forest History Society Archives, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  13. Energy Policy and Conservation Act (1975) Public law 94–163. Dec 2 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/94/s622/text
  14. Executive Order 12287 (1981) Decontrol of crude oil and refined petroleum products. Fed Reg 46:20Google Scholar
  15. Gallop Opinion Index (1979a) Report 164Google Scholar
  16. Gallop Opinion Index (1979b) Report:167Google Scholar
  17. Gottfried PE (2007) Conservatism in America: making sense of the American right. Palgrave MacMillan, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossman PZ (2013) U.S. energy policy and the pursuit of failure. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helvarg D (2004) The war against the greens: the “wise use” movement, the new right and the browning of America. Johnson Books, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirsh R, Jones CF (2014) History’s contributions to energy research and policy. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:106–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirsh R, Sovacool BK (2013) Wind turbines and invisible technology: unarticulated reasons for opposition to wind energy. Technol Cult 54(4):705–734.  https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2013.0131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hughes TP (1983) Networks of power: electrification in western society, 1880–1930. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes TP (1987) The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker W, Hughes TP, Pinch T (eds) Social construction of technological systems. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Illich I (1973) Tools for conviviality. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs M (2016) Panic at the pump: the energy crisis and the transformation of American politics in the 1970s. Hill and Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones CF (2014) Routes of power: energy and modern America. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.  https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674419612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplinsky R (1990) The economies of small: appropriate technology in a changing world. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.  https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780440729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laird F (2003) Constructing the future: advocating energy technologies in the Cold War. Technol Cult 44(1):27–49.  https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2003.0030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LeCain TJ (2009) Mass destruction: the men and giant mines that wired America and scarred the planet. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  30. Lovins A (1976) Energy strategy: the road not taken? Foreign Affairs, OctGoogle Scholar
  31. Meadows D (1972) Limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. McGirr L (2001) Suburban warriors: the origins of the New American Right. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  33. Michigan Department of Natural Resources (1993) Air quality division, determination of best available control technology (BACT) for lead emissions, Nov 20Google Scholar
  34. Miller CA, Iles A, Jones CF (2013) Social dimensions of energy transitions. Science as Culture 22(2):135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Melosi M, Pratt J (2007) Energy metropolis: an environmental history of Houston and the Gulf Coast. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.  https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zwb5m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mumford L (1964) Authoritarian and democratic technics. Technol Cult 5(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3101118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. National Forest Product Association (1977) NFPA newsletter, April 15Google Scholar
  38. Nixon R (1973) Address to the nation about policies to deal with the energy shortages, Nov 7, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=4034
  39. Norton B (1970) “Cool water, wild rivers, clean air, and solar power,” Audubon, Jan 1970Google Scholar
  40. O’Toole T (1973) Energy-starved world seeks sustenance,” Washington Post, Nov 26Google Scholar
  41. Osborn RG, Higgins KF, Usgaard RE, Dieter CD, Neiger RD (1999) Bird mortality associated with wind turbines at the Buffalo Ridge Wind Resource Area, Minnesota. Am Midl Nat 143(1):41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perlin J (2013) Let it shine: the 6,000-year story of solar energy. New World Library, NovatoGoogle Scholar
  43. Pines BY (1988) The ten legacies of Ronald Reagan. Heritage Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Priest TR (2007) The offshore imperative: Shell Oil’s search for petroleum in postwar America. Texas A&M University Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  45. Priest TR (2012) The dilemmas of oil empire. J Am Hist 99(1):236–251.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jas065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pritchard SB (2011) Confluence: the nature of technology and the remaking of the Rhone. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.  https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pursell C (1979) The history of technology as a source of appropriate technology. Public Hist 1(2):21Google Scholar
  48. Pursell C (1993) The rise and fall of the appropriate technology movement in the United States, 1965-1985. Technol Cult 34(3):629–637.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3106707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson L to Michigan Pollution Control Commission, 1992. Folder 49, Box 1, Saint Francis Prayer Center Records, Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  50. Sabin P (2005) Crude politics: the California oil market, 1900–1940. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  51. Schot J (2016) Confronting the second deep transition through the historical imagination. Technol Cult 57(2):446–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schumacher EF (1973) Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Shelton J (1976) The woodburner’s encyclopedia. Vermont Crossroads Press, WaitsfieldGoogle Scholar
  54. Smallwood KS, Thelander C (2008) Bird mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area, California. J Wildl Manag 72(1):215–223.  https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smil V (2010) Energy transitions: history, requirements, prospects. Praeger, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith N (1981) Wood: an ancient fuel source with a new future. Worldwatch Paper 42. Worldwatch InstituteGoogle Scholar
  57. Sovacool BK (2014) What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tarr J (1999) Transforming an energy system: the evolution of the manufactured gas industry and the transition to natural gas in the United States (1807-1954). In: Coutard O (ed) The governance of large technical systems. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner JM (2009) ‘The specter of environmentalism’: wilderness, environmental politics, and the evolution of the new right. J Am Hist 96(1):123–148.  https://doi.org/10.2307/27694734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Uekotter F (2012) Fukushima, Europe, and the authoritarian nature of nuclear technology. Environ Hist 17(2):277–284.  https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emr156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Webber T (1995) Area activists get pointers from veteran of Love Canal. Flint Journal, Dec 2Google Scholar
  62. White R (1995) The organic machine: the remaking of the Columbia River. Hill and Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northern Michigan UniversityMarquetteUSA

Personalised recommendations