Vulnerability to climate change and the desire for mitigation
- 284 Downloads
The interrelationship between vulnerability and climate change is understudied. Through this research, we fill this relative gap using rural Nevada as a case study. In 2009/2010, we surveyed 1872 ranchers and farmers, investigating their climate change-related assumptions, experiences, knowledge bases, and policy preferences. Almost 26 % responded to our mail-based survey. We created a climate change vulnerability index as a function of physical vulnerability, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity and applied it for every respondent using demographic data from the survey and secondary Geographical Information System-based data on water availability and use, and population. In our research, we investigate the influence of vulnerability and its components on climate change mitigation policy support. The results show that vulnerability is an insignificant determinant of supporting climate change mitigation policies. Both physical vulnerability and adaptive capacity play no role in determining climate change mitigation policy support. However, sensitivity to climate change decreases support of stringent policies (i.e., taxation policies), but does not influence support of non-stringent policies (i.e., technological fixes). The most prominent determinants of climate change mitigation policy support are beliefs regarding the anthropogenic causes of climate change, beliefs regarding the causal relationship between drought and climate change in Nevada, and political orientations.
KeywordsClimate change policy support Vulnerability Ranchers and farmers
This research was generously funded by the National Science foundation (NSF) and the Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE) (Agreement No. EPS-0814372).
Many organizations provided assistance during the pursuit of this research project by either providing secondary data or precious technical support. Those organizations include the Dessert Research Institute (DRI), the University of Nevada Cooperative Extension, the Center for Environmental Systems Research, Kassel University, Germany, and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. This research would have never been completed without the generosity of Nevada’s ranchers and farmers, who spent considerable time reading, contemplating and completing a survey that formed the backbone of this research project.
The first author would like to thank his mother (Fatma Safi) who supported him restlessly in his career and scientific pursuits. He would also thank his wife Fatma and his children for providing love, patience and understanding. Dr. Smith would like to thank those at UNLV who provided a supportive environment and the creative space to complete this and many associated works. He also thanks Dr. Ross Guida and Dr. David Hassenzahl for their input, and his family for their support.
- Barnett T, Pierce D (2008) When will Lake Mead go dry? J Water Resour 44. doi: 10.1029/2007WR006704
- Borick CP, Lachapelle E, Rabe BG (2011) Climate compared: public opinion on Climate Change in the United States and Canada. Governance Studies at Brookings; Brookings http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2011/04_climate_change_opinion.aspx. Accessed 15 February 2012
- Brewer PR, Pease A (2010) Federal Climate Politics in the United States: Polarization and Paralysis. In: Compston H, Bailey I (eds) Turning Down the Heat: The Politics of Climate Policy in Affluent Democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 85–103Google Scholar
- CIER (2008) Economic impacts of climate change in Nevada. University of Maryland, Center of Integrative Environmental http://www.cier.umd.edu/climateadaptation/Nevada%20Economic%20Impacts%20of%20Climate%20Change.pdf/. Accessed 24 Feb 2010Google Scholar
- Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2010) Climate change denial: sources, actors, and strategies. In: Lever-Tracy C (ed) The Routledge International Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Routledge Press, New York, pp. 240–259Google Scholar
- Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment http://earthleaders.org/projects/psf/Dunlap%20%20McCright%202008%20A%20widening%20gap%20Environment.pdf. Accessed 15 February 2012.
- Falkenmark M, Widstrand C (1992) Population and water resources: a delicate balance. Population Bulletin 47(3):1–36Google Scholar
- Hamilton C (2010) Requiem for a species: why we resist the truth about climate change. Earthscan, London and Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Hollingshead AB (1975) Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. contribution of Group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. contribution of Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Jamison A (2010) Climate change knowledge and social movement theory Wiley International Reviews. Clim Chang 1(6):811–823Google Scholar
- Jenkins-Smith H, Goebbert K, Klockow K, Nowlin M (2010) Seeing the world through a political lens: The connection between weather and climate change perceptions and beliefs. A paper presented at the 5th Symposium on Policy and Socio-Economic Research, AMS, Atlanta, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar
- Leiserowitz A (2003) Global warming in the American mind: the roles of affect imagery, and the worldviews in Risk Perception, policy preference and behavior. University of Oregon, DissertationGoogle Scholar
- Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2010) Climate change in the American mind: public policy support for climate and energy policies in June 2010. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/PolicySupportJune2010.pdf. Accessed at 10 March 2012
- O’Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A (1999) Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19(3):461–447Google Scholar
- Perveen S (2008) Multi-scale effects on spatial metrics in global water resource data: implication to water stress. University of South Carolina, DissertationGoogle Scholar
- Shwom R, Dietz T, Dan A (2008) The effects of information and state of residence on climate change policy support. Clim Change 90:343–358Google Scholar
- Shwom R, Bidwell D, Dan A, Dietz T (2010) Understanding U.S. public support for domestic. Clim Chang Policies 20:472–482Google Scholar
- Smith W Jr, Liu Z, Safi A, Chief K (2014) Climate change perception, observation and policy support in rural nevada: a comparative analysis of Native Americans, non-native ranchers and farmers and mainstream America. Environ Sci Policy 42:101–122. Free article access provided funded the NSF at http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S1462901114000641. Video documentary at http://epscorspo.nevada.edu/native-american-indian-video/. Accessed at 26 Feb 2016
- SNWA (2007) Drought plan. Southern Nevada Water Authority. http://www.snwa.com/html/drought_plan.html/. Accessed 01 March 2008
- U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (2011) Secure Water Act Section 9502©-reclamation climate change and water 2011. http://www.usbr.gov/climate/SECURE/docs/SECUREWaterReport.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2011
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2010) Economic research services. Sate fact sheets: Nevada, 2010. http://www.ers.usda.gov/StateFacts/NV.htm. Accessed 10 February 201 0
- United States Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) (2009) Climate change impacts on the united states. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge http://downloads.globalchange.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2010.