Skip to main content

Justice is the goal: divestment as climate change resistance

Abstract

This article takes a sympathetic look at the university fossil fuel divestment movement. The push for divestment is changing the conversation about what “sustainability” means for college campuses. It is also generating a new, more critical and politically engaged cadre of climate activists. We use a shared auto-ethnographic approach from student activists’ and professors’ perspectives to analyze the campus divestment movement based on the experience of American University’s Fossil Free AU campaign. We argue that this issue is one where sustainability politics are re-politicized as they challenge traditional power relations and conceptualizations of what environmentalism entails. The case study explores how a climate justice framework, radical perspectives, and inside/outsider strategies were used within the campaign. We argue that the campus fossil fuel divestment movement holds potential to change the university’s expressed values from complicity with fossil fuel economies toward an emergent paradigm of climate justice, stemming predominantly from student activism. The work presents new vantage points for understanding the relationship of personal experience, local campaigns of ecological resistance, and sustainability politics more broadly.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    None of the student authors received course credit, nor were they similarly graded in relation to this work. We occasionally met in person and most frequently collaborated in virtual spaces such as email and videoconference and delineated roles for the case study narrative and data analysis to largely be driven by the student collaborators and theoretical contributions and analysis largely led by the faculty co-authors within a series of iterations of this work.

  2. 2.

    For the referendum and resolution voting results, see: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/55e5d8e7e4b0bfa49c5f2d56/t/56324bdbe4b0008d7da107f7/1446136795524/Spring+2013+Election+Results.pdf and http://www.american.edu/facultysenate/upload/05-01-2013-Faculty-Senate-Minutes.pdf

  3. 3.

    The university’s investment advisors, Cambridge Associates, did make clear that a withdrawal of endowment investments from fossil fuel companies would be possible, but management fees were estimated to double by $1.1 million per year. Since investment in a divested portfolio could not be assured to be financially insignificant for the university, the board decision concluded that “DC law surpassed the relevance of other considerations, including compelling arguments both for and against divestment the DC law concerning fiduciary responsibility.” Sine, J. A. 2014. Fall 2014 Board of Trustees Meeting – Sustainability & Fossil Free Discussion and Decision. ed. A. U. Community. Washington DC: American University.

References

  1. AASHE (2015) STARS (Sustainability Tracking, Assessment, and Rating System) Report. Philadelphia: Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE)

  2. Agyeman J, Bullard R, Evans B (2003) Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. American University (2008) Leadership for a changing world: American University Strategic Plan. American University, Washington, DC

  4. American University (2014) About American University. American University, Washington, DC

  5. American University Office of Sustainability (2014) Solar project to bring energy to three D.C. institutions. American University, Washington, DC

  6. Ansar A, Caldecott B, Tillbury J (2013) Stranded assets and the fossil fuel divestment campaign: what does divestment mean for the valuation of fossil fuel assets? In Stranded Assets Programme, 81. Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ball J (2014) The truth about Stanford’s coal divestment. In: The new republic

  8. Bond P (2012) Politics of climate justice: paralysis above, movement below. KwaZulu-Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bullard RD (1996) Unequal protection: environmental justice and communities of color. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bullard N, Müller T (2012) Beyond the ‘Green Economy’: system change, not climate change? Development 55:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cole LW, Foster SR (2000) From the ground up: environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. NYU Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Denzin NK (2006) Analytic autoethnography, or déjà vu all over again. J Contemp Ethnogr 35:419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Chiro G (2009) Living environmentalisms: coalition politics, social reproduction, and environmental justice. In: Bomberg E, Schlosberg D (eds) Environmentalism in the United States: changing conceptions of activism. Routledge, New York

  14. Falk R (1971) This endangered planet: prospects and proposals for human survival. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falk R (1975) A study of future worlds. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fund RB (2014) Divestment Statement.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gottlieb R (2001) Environmentalism unbound: exploring new pathways for change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grady-Benson J, Sarathy B (2015) Fossil fuel divestment in US higher education: student-led organising for climate justice. Local Environment 1-21

  19. Inayatullah N (2011) Autobiographical International Relations: I, IR. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  21. Kaplan J, Raman R (2014) American University recognized as one of the greenest and “coolest” schools. American University, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klein N (2014) This Changes Everything: capitalism vs. climate. Simon & Schuster, New York

  23. Kumarakulasingam N (2014) Bloody translations: the politics of international compassion and horror. Journal of Narrative Politics 1:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lapin, L (2014) Stanford to divest from coal companies. Stanford News May 6 2014

  25. Mandaville P (2011) Cosmography recapitulates biography: an epilogue, Peter Mandaville In Autobiographical International Relations: I, IR, Ed. N. Inayatullah, 196–203. Routledge, New York

  26. McKibben B (2012) Global warming’s terrifying new math. In Rolling Stone.

  27. Merkel J, Litten L, Litten L (2007) The sustainability challenge. In: Terkla LLAD (ed) Advancing sustainability in higher education: new directions for institutional research. Wiley Periodicals, San Francisco, pp 7–26

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moellendorf D (2012) Climate change and global justice. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 3:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neumann IB (2010) Autobiography, ontology, autoethnology. Rev Int Stud 36:1051–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nicholson S, Chong D (2011) Jumping on the human rights bandwagon: how rights-based linkages can refocus climate politics. Globa Environ Polit 11:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Novotny P (2000) Where we live, work, and play: the environmental justice movement and the struggle for a new environmentalism. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  32. Parenti C (2013) A worthy goal, but a suspect method. The New york times. January 27 2013: Op-Ed

  33. Pearson M (2006) “In comes I”: performance, memory and landscape. University of Exeter Press, Exeter, UK

  34. Ralph M, Stubbs W (2014) Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. High Educ 67:71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schlosberg D (2007) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Schlosberg D (2013) Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environ Polit 22:37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schlosberg D, Collins LB (2014) From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5:359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shue H (1999) Global environment and international inequality. Int Aff 75:531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sine JA (2013) Action on proposals related to socially responsible investment. Ed. A. U. Community, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sine JA (2014) Fall 2014 board of trustees meeting—sustainability & fossil free discussion and decision. In: AU Community (ed). American University, Washington DC

  41. Thomashow M (2014) The nine elements of a sustainable campus. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vincent S (2009) Growth in Environmental studies and science programs. Asso Environ Stud Sci 2:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wall S (2008) Easier said than done: writing an autoethnography. Int J Qual Methods 7:38–53

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wright N (2011) Christianity and Environmental Justice. CrossCurrents 61:161–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eve Bratman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bratman, E., Brunette, K., Shelly, D.C. et al. Justice is the goal: divestment as climate change resistance. J Environ Stud Sci 6, 677–690 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0377-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Divestment
  • Fossil fuel
  • Climate change
  • Higher education
  • Activism