A positive vision of sustainability

  • Steven A. Cohen
  • Kelsie L. DeFrancia
  • Hayley J. Martinez


Growing population, increased urbanization, a growing global economy, and increased use of natural resources have created a demand for sustainability. Sustainability is an interdisciplinary field that requires collaboration from multiple perspectives. The planet’s resources are all being used at a ferocious pace. Energy is at the center of this issue; dependence on fossil fuels is causing extensive damage to ecosystems and public health and is a major cause of global climate change. The goal of a renewable resource-based economy is therefore important for the future, but rather than attacking the fossil fuel industry, it should be achieved through a positive vision of sustainability—one that includes the need to invest in basic and applied science of renewable energy in order to make renewables cheaper than fossil fuels. We will discuss the opportunities in sustainability-focused education and research that are needed for the transition to a renewable economy. We will also discuss the trend toward urbanization and the opportunities that exist in urban areas to close the cycle of production and consumption. Not only does most of the world’s population live in cities, but cities are paving the path toward a sustainable future. All of these factors contribute to a positive and creative vision of sustainability that focuses on building something new and clean rather than defeating something old and dirty.


Sustainability Renewable energy Education Urbanization Technology Research and development 


  1. Beranek L (2000) Roots of the internet: a person history. Mass Hist Rev 2:55–75Google Scholar
  2. Bettencourt L, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:19540–19545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Strumsky D, West G (2010) Urban scaling and its deviations: revealing the structure of wealth, innovation and crime across cities. PLoS ONE 5(11), e13541. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs E, Bruce E, Boruff B, Duncan J, Horsley J, Pauli N, McNeil K, Neef A, Ogtrop F, Curnow J, Haworth B, Duce S, Imanari Y (2015) Sustainable development and the water-energy-food nexus: a perspective on livelihoods. Environ Sci & Policy 54:389–397. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boroush M (2015) U.S. R&D Increased in 2013, well ahead of the pace of gross domestic product. National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15330/. Accessed 1 November 2015
  6. Buch T, Hamann S, Niebuhr A, Rossen A (2013) What makes cities attractive? The determinants of urban labour migration in Germany. Urban Stud 51(9):1960–1978. doi:10.1177/0042098013499796 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Central College (2015) Global sustainability. http://www.central.edu/sustainability/in-the-classroom/. Accessed 27 October 2015
  8. Champion T (2001) Urbanization, suburbanization, counterurbanization and reurbanization. In: Paddison R (ed) Handbook of urban studies. Sage, London, pp 143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Rosenthal S (2008) Local amenities and life-cycle migration: do people move for jobs or fun? J Urban Econ 64:519–537. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheshire P (2006) Resurgent cities, urban myths and policy hubris: what we need to know. Urb Stud 43:1231–1246. doi:10.1080/00420980600775600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen S, Eimicke W, Miller A (2015) Sustainability policy: hastening the transition to a cleaner economy. Wiley, Hoboken, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  12. Congress.gov (2015) H.R. 1806—America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2015. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1806/text. Accessed 28 October 2015
  13. Dittrich-Wesbuer A, Föbker S, Osterhage F (2008) Demographic change and migration in city regions: results from two German case studies. Zamm-Z Angew Math Me 33:315–350. doi:10.1007/s12523-009-0019-0 Google Scholar
  14. Donovan S, Holdren JP (2015) Memorandum: multi-agency science and technology priorities for the FY 2017 budget. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/m-15-16.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2015
  15. Finley J, Seiber J (2014) The nexus of food, energy, and water. J Agr Food Chem 62:6255–6262. doi:10.1021/jf501496r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenberg M (2013) What on earth is sustainable? Toward critical sustainability studies. Boom: A Journal of California 3(4):54–66Google Scholar
  17. Green Mountain College (2015) Liberal arts with a purpose. http://www.greenmtn.edu/academics/environmental-liberal-arts-program/. Accessed 28 October 2015
  18. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (2010) Sustainable development., ITDP, http://www.itdp.org/what-we-do/sustainable-urban-development/. Accessed 28 October 2015Google Scholar
  19. Krug D (2012) STEM education and sustainability in Canada and the United States. 2nd Annual STEM in Education Conference. http://stem2012.bnu.edu.cn/data/long%20paper/stem2012_87.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2015
  20. Machell J, Prior K, Allan R, Andresen J (2015) The water energy food nexus—challenges and emerging solutions. Environ Sci: Water Res & Technol 1:15–16. doi:10.1039/C4EW90001D Google Scholar
  21. Markovich S (2012) Promoting innovation through R&D., CFR Backgrounders, http://www.cfr.org/innovation/promoting-innovation-through-rd/p29403. Accessed 28 October 2015Google Scholar
  22. MIT Committee to Evaluate the Innovation Deficit (2015) The future postponed: why declining investment in basic research threatens a US innovation deficit. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://dc.mit.edu/sites/default/files/innovation_deficit/Future%20Postponed.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2015
  23. Porter E (2015) American innovation lies on weak foundation., The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/20/business/economy/american-innovation-rests-on-weak-foundation.html?_r=0. Accessed 1 November 2015Google Scholar
  24. Storper M, Manville M (2006) Behaviour, preferences and cities: urban theory and urban resurgence. Urban Stud 43:1247–1274. doi:10.1080/00420980600775642 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Svara J, Watt T, Jang H (2013) How are US cities doing sustainability? Who is getting on the sustainability train and why? Cityscape 15:9–44Google Scholar
  26. Swift A (2014) Americans again pick environment over economic growth., GALLUP, http://www.gallup.com/poll/168017/americans-again-pick-environment-economic-growth.aspx. Accessed 27 October 2015Google Scholar
  27. The Earth Institute (2015) A guide to educational programs in environmental and sustainable development at Columbia University. http://issuu.com/earthinstitute/docs/education-guide?e=4098028/2475352. Accessed 2 November 2015
  28. The Regents of the University of California (2010) History., Bren School of Environmental Sciences & Management, http://www.esm.ucsb.edu/about/about_history.html. Accessed 1 November 2015Google Scholar
  29. The University of Texas at Austin (2015) Energy poll. http://www.utenergypoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/October-2015-UT-Energy-Poll-Final2.pdf. Accessed 27 October 2015
  30. United Nations (2014) Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352) http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/highlights/wup2014-highlights.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2015
  31. Van den Berg A, Hartig T, Staats H (2007) Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. J of Soc Issues 63:79–96. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wals A (2014) Sustainability in higher education in the context of the UN DESD: a review of learning and institutionalization processes. J Cleaner Prod 62:8–15. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiek A, Harlow J, Melnick R, Van der Leeuw S, Fukushi K, Takeuchi K, Farioli F, Yamba F, Blake A, Geiger C, Show R (2015) Sustainability science in action: a review of the state of the field through case studies on disaster recovery, bioenergy, and precautionary purchasing. Sustain Sci 10:17–31. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0261-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiek A, Ness B, Schweizer-Reis P, Brand F, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7:5–24. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0148-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wong K, Pecora C (2015) Recommendations for energy-water-food nexus problems. J Energy Resour Technol 137:032002–032002-5. doi:10.1115/1.4028139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. World commission on environment and development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Zborel T (2011) Sustainable connections: strategies to support local economies., National League of Cities, http://www.nlc.org/Documents/Find%20City%20Solutions/Research%20Innovation/Sustainability/sustainable-connections-strategies-to-support-local-economies-mag-jun11.pdf. Accessed 28 October 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven A. Cohen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kelsie L. DeFrancia
    • 1
  • Hayley J. Martinez
    • 1
  1. 1.The Earth InstituteColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations