Skip to main content


Log in

Model-based reasoning to foster environmental and socio-scientific literacy in higher education

  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript


The American public’s environmental, scientific, and civic literacies are generally low. While environmental science courses often recognize the human dimensions of environmental problems and solutions, they typically treat such phenomena as matters of opinion and rarely engage with social scientific ways of knowing. Recently, there has been a push in higher education to advance broader scientific literacy, but little attention has been paid to helping students gain an understanding of how socio-scientific evidence and claims are generated. Our work here aims to develop the knowledge framework that facilitates the integration of knowledge across biophysical and social science domains. In this research brief, we report on a project in which an interdisciplinary team developed a model of climate adaptation and mitigation to help teach undergraduates about the coupled human-climate system. The research team found this process to be integral to both thinking and learning about a system with biophysical and social variables. This project is unique in that we then used this model to develop not just curricula but also a framework that can be used to guide and assess interdisciplinary instruction at the collegiate level. This framework allows learners to make sense of complex socio-environmental issues and reason with scientific information from the social and biophysical sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud D, Feletti G (1998) The challenge of problem-based learning. Psychology Press

  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A, Redman CL (2010) Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(4):308–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree N (2014) Changing the Intellectual Climate. Nat Clim Chang 4:763–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle K (2005) Environmental literacy in America: what ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the U.S. The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.

  • Crawford B, Jordan RC (2013) Inquiry, models, and complex reasoning to transform learning in environmental education. In: Krasny and Dillon (eds.) Transdisciplinary Research in Environmental Education. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Dauer JT, Long TM (2015) Long-term conceptual retrieval by college biology majors following model-based instruction. J Res Sci Teach DOI:. doi:10.1002/tea.21258

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T (2013) New Essays in Risk, Energy, and Sustainability. In: Dietz T, Jorgenesen A (eds) Chapter 3: Epistemology, ontology, and the practice of structural human ecology pp. 31–52 in Structural Human Ecology. Washington State University Press, Pullman, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Catton Jr W (1994) Struggling with human exemptionalism: the rise, decline, and revitalization of environmental sociology. Am Sociol 25:5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl RA, Schweingruber HA, Shouse AW (2007) Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske SJ, Crate SA, Crumley CL, Galvin K, Lazrus H, Lucero L, Oliver-Smith A, Orlove B, Strauss S, Wilk R (2014) Changing the atmosphere. Anthropology and climate change. Final report of the AAA Global Climate Change Task Force: 137. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association

  • Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press

  • Hmelo-Silver CE (2004) Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev 16(3):235–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan RC, Duncan RG (2009) Preservice teachers’ image of science in ecology when compared to genetics. J Biol Educ 43:62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan RC, Singer F, Vaughan J, Berkowitz A (2009) What should every citizen know about ecology? Front Ecol Environ 7:495–500

  • Jordan RC, Sorensen AE, Hmelo-Silver C (2014) A conceptual representation to support ecological systems learning. Nat Sci Educ 43:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005a) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005b) Fostering ecoliteracy through model-based instruction. Front Ecol Environ 12:138–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Long TM, Dauer JT, Kostelnik KM, Momsen JL, Wyse SA, Speth EB, Ebert-May D (2014) Fostering ecoliteracy through model-based instruction. Front Ecol Environ 12:138–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JHF, Land R (2005) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. High Educ 49:373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middendorf J, Pace D (2004) Decoding the disciplines: a model for helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Dir Teach Learn 98:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD (2002) Civic scientific literacy. FAS Public Interest Report. J Fed Am Sci 55:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistry RS, Brown CS, Chow KA, Collins GS (2012) Increasing the complexity of young adolescents’ beliefs about poverty and inequality: results of an 8th grade social studies curriculum intervention. J Youth Adoles 41(6):704–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2011) Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. In: Successful K-12 STEM education: identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington D, Bammer G, Danielson A, Gosselin D, Gouvea J, Habron G, Hawthorne D, Parnell R, Thompson K, Vincent S, Wei C (2015) The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis. J Environ Sci Stud in press

  • Pickett STA, Kolasa J, Jones CG (2007) Ecological understanding: the nature of theory and the theory of nature, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robelia B, Murphy T (2012) What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environ Ed Res 18(3) 2012:299–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth A, Wiener N (1945) The role of models in science. Philos Sci 12(4):316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler TD, Zeidler DL (2005) Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. J Res Sci Teach 42:112–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler TD, Barab SA, Scott B (2007) What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Res Sci Educ 37:371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz DL, Martin T (2004) Inventing to prepare for future learning: the hidden efficiency of encouraging student production in statistics instruction. Cognition Instruct 222:129–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dynam Rev 10:291–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) (2009) Climate literacy: the essential principles of climate science. Available at (accessed 9 6 2015).

  • Vincent S, Focht W (2009) US higher education environmental program managers’ perspectives on curriculum design and core competencies: implications for sustainability as a guiding framework. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 10(2):164–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky U, Reisman K (2006) Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach. Cognition Instruct 24:171–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson TD, Gilbert DT (2003) Affective forecasting. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 35:345–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York R (2013) New Essays in Risk, Energy, and Sustainability. In: Dietz T, Jorgenesen A (eds) Metatheoretical foundations of post-normal prediction pp. 19–30 in Structural Human Ecology. Washington State University Press, Pullman, WA

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to acknowledge the Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center in Annapolis, Maryland for hosting and facilitating this work under the Learning across Natural and Social Sciences pursuit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda E. Sorensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sorensen, A.E., Jordan, R.C., Shwom, R. et al. Model-based reasoning to foster environmental and socio-scientific literacy in higher education. J Environ Stud Sci 6, 287–294 (2016).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: