Model-based reasoning to foster environmental and socio-scientific literacy in higher education
The American public’s environmental, scientific, and civic literacies are generally low. While environmental science courses often recognize the human dimensions of environmental problems and solutions, they typically treat such phenomena as matters of opinion and rarely engage with social scientific ways of knowing. Recently, there has been a push in higher education to advance broader scientific literacy, but little attention has been paid to helping students gain an understanding of how socio-scientific evidence and claims are generated. Our work here aims to develop the knowledge framework that facilitates the integration of knowledge across biophysical and social science domains. In this research brief, we report on a project in which an interdisciplinary team developed a model of climate adaptation and mitigation to help teach undergraduates about the coupled human-climate system. The research team found this process to be integral to both thinking and learning about a system with biophysical and social variables. This project is unique in that we then used this model to develop not just curricula but also a framework that can be used to guide and assess interdisciplinary instruction at the collegiate level. This framework allows learners to make sense of complex socio-environmental issues and reason with scientific information from the social and biophysical sciences.
KeywordsEnvironmental Literacy Climate Change Modeling Socio-scientific Science education
We would like to acknowledge the Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center in Annapolis, Maryland for hosting and facilitating this work under the Learning across Natural and Social Sciences pursuit.
- Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
- Boud D, Feletti G (1998) The challenge of problem-based learning. Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
- Coyle K (2005) Environmental literacy in America: what ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the U.S. The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.Google Scholar
- Crawford B, Jordan RC (2013) Inquiry, models, and complex reasoning to transform learning in environmental education. In: Krasny and Dillon (eds.) Transdisciplinary Research in Environmental Education. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Dietz T (2013) New Essays in Risk, Energy, and Sustainability. In: Dietz T, Jorgenesen A (eds) Chapter 3: Epistemology, ontology, and the practice of structural human ecology pp. 31–52 in Structural Human Ecology. Washington State University Press, Pullman, WAGoogle Scholar
- Duschl RA, Schweingruber HA, Shouse AW (2007) Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Fiske SJ, Crate SA, Crumley CL, Galvin K, Lazrus H, Lucero L, Oliver-Smith A, Orlove B, Strauss S, Wilk R (2014) Changing the atmosphere. Anthropology and climate change. Final report of the AAA Global Climate Change Task Force: 137. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological AssociationGoogle Scholar
- Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Jordan RC, Singer F, Vaughan J, Berkowitz A (2009) What should every citizen know about ecology? Front Ecol Environ 7:495–500Google Scholar
- Jordan RC, Sorensen AE, Hmelo-Silver C (2014) A conceptual representation to support ecological systems learning. Nat Sci Educ 43:141–146Google Scholar
- Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005a) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005b) Fostering ecoliteracy through model-based instruction. Front Ecol Environ 12:138–139Google Scholar
- Miller JD (2002) Civic scientific literacy. FAS Public Interest Report. J Fed Am Sci 55:3–6Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2011) Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. In: Successful K-12 STEM education: identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Pennington D, Bammer G, Danielson A, Gosselin D, Gouvea J, Habron G, Hawthorne D, Parnell R, Thompson K, Vincent S, Wei C (2015) The EMBeRS project: employing model-based reasoning in socio-environmental synthesis. J Environ Sci Stud in pressGoogle Scholar
- Pickett STA, Kolasa J, Jones CG (2007) Ecological understanding: the nature of theory and the theory of nature, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) (2009) Climate literacy: the essential principles of climate science. Available athttp://www.globalchange.gov/browse/educators (accessed 9 6 2015).
- York R (2013) New Essays in Risk, Energy, and Sustainability. In: Dietz T, Jorgenesen A (eds) Metatheoretical foundations of post-normal prediction pp. 19–30 in Structural Human Ecology. Washington State University Press, Pullman, WAGoogle Scholar