Beyond interdisciplinary: how sustainability creates opportunities for pan-university efforts

Article
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

In many universities, sustainability is gaining currency in the classroom, in research, and in practice. This paper will examine how George Washington University has crafted sustainability education as a pan-university program. We briefly discuss the origins GW’s sustainability efforts, then explain how the vision of a pan-university approach was developed. GW’s Academic Program in Sustainability does not reside in any one school—instead it sits under the Office of the Provost. As such, Sustainability belongs to all schools. We next discuss the development of a pan-university sustainability minor, open to all students, and featuring courses and faculty from all schools at the university. As universities undertake efforts to integrate sustainability into the curriculum, an important element is team-teaching. Because sustainability is inherently trans-disciplinary, courses that are team-taught generate multiple perspectives on the same issues, leading to dynamic and engaging discussions with faculty and students. We examine the success of the Introduction to Sustainability course that uses five faculty from five different schools at GW to provide students the exposure to how different disciplines problem solve around sustainability, and how a team approach lends itself well to the learning outcomes of the course. There is also tremendous value in student experiential learning around sustainability. GW requires Sustainability minors to complete an internship or service project around sustainability, and we discuss how this is structured. We also highlight how the process of creating a pan-university program in sustainability provided an opportunity for faculty collaboration, creativity, and “thinking outside the box” approaches. Finally, by positioning sustainability as pan-university, we have met with challenges. We address the challenges and obstacles to creating a genuinely pan-university effort that seeks to escape the traditional “silos” of schools and departments and to move beyond interdisciplinarity as well.

Keywords

Sustainability curriculum Pan-university objectives Innovations in sustainability education 

References

  1. Anderson RS, Speck BW (1998) “Oh what a difference a team makes” why team teaching makes a difference. Teach Teach Educ 14(7):671–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arhar J (1997) The effects of interdisciplinary teaming on teachers and students. What Current Research Says to the Middle Level Practitioner 49–55Google Scholar
  3. Arizona State University School of Sustainability. 2015. Access August 2015 at: https://schoolofsustainability.asu.edu/
  4. Armstrong CM (2011) Implementing education for sustainable development: the potential use of time-honored pedagogical practice from the progressive era of education. Journal of Sustainability Education, Vol 2, March 20011Google Scholar
  5. Bacon C (2012) The creation of an integrated sustainability curriculum and student praxis projects. Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 12.2 (2011): 193-208Google Scholar
  6. Barlett P, Chase GW (2004) Sustainability on campus: stories and strategies for change. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Barlett P, Chase GW (2012) Curricular innovation for sustainability: the Piedmont/Ponderosa model of faculty development. Lib Educ 98(4):14–21Google Scholar
  8. Barlow Z and Stone M 2011 Living systems and leadership: cultivating conditions for institutional change. Journal of Sustainability Education. Volume 2Google Scholar
  9. Benton-Short L (2013) Personal conversation with Undergraduate Dean at GWGoogle Scholar
  10. Benton-Short L (2014a) Personal conversation with GW Dean and Department ChairGoogle Scholar
  11. Benton-Short L (2014b) Personal conversation with an Assistant Professor in Economics at GW (name withheld to protect privacy)Google Scholar
  12. Brundiers K, Wiek A, Redman C (2010) Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(4):308–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burns Heather (2011) Teaching for transformation: (re)designing sustainability courses based on ecological principles. Journal of Sustainability Education (2)Google Scholar
  14. Buszard D, Kolb J (2011) Institutional innovation to deliver post-secondary education for sustainability. Sustain Sustain J Rec 4(2):80–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cloud J 2014 The Essential Elements of Education for Sustainability (EfS): Editorial Introduction from the Guest Editor. Journal of Sustainability Education, Vol 6, May 2014Google Scholar
  16. Columbia University, Earth Institute, 2015. Accessed August 2015 at: http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/articles/view/50
  17. Cos M and L Richlin (Eds) (2011) Building faculty learning communities. New directions for teaching and learning, no. 97. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Periodicals, IncGoogle Scholar
  18. Davison A (2012) Building capacity for interdisciplinary climate change teaching at four universities. Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 15.1 (2013): 98-110. WebGoogle Scholar
  19. Dilafruz W, Burns H and S Kelley (2014) A framework for leadership for sustainability education at Portland State University. Journal of Sustainability Education, Vol 6, May 2014Google Scholar
  20. Ellis G, Weekes T (2008) Making sustainability ‘real’: using group-enquiry to promote education for sustainable development. Environ Educ Res 14(4):482–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engineering Accreditation Commission. 2012. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs” Accessed on August 2015 at: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2015-2016/#objectives
  22. George Washington University. 2013. Vision 2021: A Strategic Plan for the Third Century of The George Washington University. Accessed on August 31, 2015 at: http://provost.gwu.edu/strategic-plan
  23. George Washington University Faculty Committee on Sustainability (2011) Proposal for Undergraduate Minor in Sustainability. (not publically available)Google Scholar
  24. Hyun E (2011) Transdisciplinary higher education curriculum: a complicated cultural artifact. Res High Educ J 11:1Google Scholar
  25. Jucker R (2002) “Sustainability? Never heard of it?” Some basics we shouldn’t ignore when engaging in education for sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ 3(1):8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  27. Littledyke M, Manolas E, Littledyke R (2013) A systems approach to education for sustainability in higher education. J Sustain High Educ 14(4):367–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Medrick R (2013) A pedagogy for sustainability education. Journal of Sustainability Education, Vol 5 May 2013Google Scholar
  29. Murata R (2002) What does team teaching mean? A case study of interdisciplinary teaming. J Educ Res 96(2):67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Byrne D, Dripps W, Nicholas KA (2014) Teaching and learning sustainability: an assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustain Sci 10(1):43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parker J (2010) Competencies for interdisciplinarity in higher education. Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 11.4 (2010): 325-38Google Scholar
  32. Pfirman, S., J. Collins, S. Lowes and A. Michaels (2005) Collaborative efforts: promoting interdisciplinary scholars. Chronicle of Higher Education, Feb 11. Accessed August 2015 at: http://chronicle.com/article/Collaborative-Efforts-/35536
  33. Ramey L (2013) Engaging learners in community service learning to enhance teacher preparation curriculum. Journal of Sustainability Education, Vol 5, May 2013Google Scholar
  34. Rusinko C (2010) Integrating sustainability in higher education: a generic matrix. J Sustain High Educ 11(3):250–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmit J (2009, December 28) As colleges add green majors and minors, classes fill up. USA Today, Accessed August 2015 at: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/industries/environment/2009-12-27-green-colleges_N.htm
  36. Sipos Y, Battisi B, Grimm K (2008) Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging head, hands and heart. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(1):68–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanford University (2015) Sustainable Stanford. Accessed on August 2015 at: www.sustainable.stanford.edu; see also https://energy.stanford.edu/ and https://woods.stanford.edu/
  38. George Washington University Presidential Task Force on Sustainability (2008) Final Report and Recommendations. June 2008Google Scholar
  39. Vincent S (2012) Trends in interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability education. AASHE Conference, October, 2012Google Scholar
  40. Vincent S, S Bunn and L Sloane (2013) Interdisciplinary Environmental and Sustainability Education on the Nation’s Campuses 2012: Curriculum Design. National Council on Science and EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  41. Vincent S, Roberts, JT and S Mulkey (2015) Interdisciplinary environmental and sustainability education: islands of progress in a sea of dysfunction. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences (2015): n. pagGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman C (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations