Skip to main content

Fostering STEM literacy through a tabletop wind turbine environmental science laboratory activity


Increasingly, national education policy is focusing on improving science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) literacy by using energy as a subject matter. In particular, The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS 2014) identified energy as an issue that collectively relates the principles of science, technology, engineering, and math for students. Learning about energy, especially alternative energy, is much broader than STEM as it also connects a current issue to environmental impacts, the economy, and society—the three pillars of sustainability. In this paper, we present a hands-on laboratory activity developed for an introductory environmental science course that uses tabletop wind turbines designed to improve students’ STEM and energy literacy and to introduce them to the science and technology of wind energy and basic land use considerations of siting wind farms. In this lab, students conceptualize and calculate the basic physical properties of wind energy potential and production by measuring velocities and calculating optimal energy production through various modifications to turbine placement and blade manipulation. Students construct mini-wind farms with multiple turbines and manipulate the footprint and height to achieve the greatest energy production on the smallest footprint thus incorporating land use considerations. This lab engages students, most of whom are not STEM majors; supports their ability to solve a real, hands-on integrated STEM problem; and increases their understanding and ability to communicate about the scientific and technical aspects of energy, in particular wind energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. To obtain a copy of the full lab, contact the lead author.


  • Allen DE, Duch BJ, Groh SE (1996) The power of problem-based learning in teaching introductory science courses. New Dir Teach Learn 68:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) (2015) Maine Wind Energy. Accessed June 23, 2015, from

  • Busch HC (2010) Using environmental science as a motivational tool to teach physics to non-science majors. Phys Teach 48(9):578–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JF (2014) Collaborative projects increase student learning outcome performance in nonmajors environmental science course. J Coll Sci Teach 43(6):58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgan, C. S. (2014) economic impacts of the wind industry construction and operations in Maine, 2006-2018. Maine Center for Business and Economic Research, University of Southern Maine. Accessed on June 23, 2015, from:

  • Cook KL (2014) Beginning a classroom inquiry: using photovoice to connect college students to community science. J Coll Sci Teach 43(6):29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bock D, Van Dooren W, Janssens D, Verschaffel L (2002) Improper use of linear reasoning: an in-depth study of the nature and the irresistibility of secondary school students’ errors. Educ Stud Math 50:311–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWaters J, Powers S (2013) Establishing measurement criteria for an energy literacy questionnaire. J Environ Educ 44(1):38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenhack BW, Martinez DM (2013) The path to more sustainable energy systems: how do we get there from here? Momentum Press, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson DE (2007) Environmental science for all? Considering environmental science for inclusion in the high school core curriculum. Sci Educ 16(1):42–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteley C, Villarreal M, Alagia H (2004) Extending linear models to non-linear contexts: an in-depth study about two university students’ mathematical productions. In: Høines MJ, Fuglestad AB (eds) Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 2. Bergen, Norway, pp 343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk A, Brodsky L (2013) Incorporating models into science teaching to meet the next generation science standards. Sci Scope 37(1):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller GE (2002) Using problem-based and active learning in an interdisciplinary science course for non-science majors. J Gen Educ 51(4):272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komarraju M, Karau SJ (2008) Relationships between the perceived value of instructional techniques and academic motivation. J Instr Psychol 35(1):70–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov JB (2004) From the National Academies: the challenges and opportunities for improving undergraduate science education through introductory courses. Cell Biol Educ 3(4):212–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A, Smith A, Marlon JR (2010) America’s Knowledge of Climate Change. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Yale University, New Haven, CT, Accessed on June 21, 2015, from:

    Google Scholar 

  • Major CH (2002) Implementing problem-based learning in undergraduate education. J Gen Educ 51(4):v–xii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. (2012, March 30) Blowing in the wind: Maine’s energy past and future. Bangor Daily News. Retrieved from

  • National Academy of Sciences (2012) Discipline-based education research: understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Next Generation Science Standards (2014) The need for science standards., Retrieved on July 16, 2014, from

    Google Scholar 

  • Robelen EW (2012) AP geography, environmental science thrive. Educ Week 31(21):17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Strimel G (2014) Shale gas extraction: drilling into current issues and making STEM connections. Technol Eng Teach 73(5):16–24

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House (2009) Press release: President Obama launches ‘educate to innovate’ campaign for excellence in science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) education., Retrieved July 16, 2014, from

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education (2013) STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields Statistical Analysis Report. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved June 28, 2015, from:,-150,546

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2015) Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Energy Literacy: Essential Principles and Fundamental Concepts for Energy Education., Retrieved June 21, 2015, from

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren W, De Bock D, Depaepe F, Janssens D, Verschaffel L (2003) The illusion of linearity: expanding the evidence towards probabilistic reasoning. Educ Stud Math 53:113–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren W, De Bock D, Janssens D, Verschaffel L (2005) Students’ overreliance on linearity: an effect of school-like word problems? In: Chick HL, Vincent JL (eds) Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 4. PME, Melbourne, pp 265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner TP, Sanford R (2010) Environmental science: active learning laboratories and applied problem sets, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the United States National Science Foundation under Grant DUE-0941778.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Travis P. Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, T.P., McCormick, K. & Martinez, D.M. Fostering STEM literacy through a tabletop wind turbine environmental science laboratory activity. J Environ Stud Sci 7, 230–238 (2017).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Sustainability
  • Alternative energy
  • Sustainable energy
  • Wind power
  • STEM Education
  • Land use impact