Lowering the walls and crossing boundaries: applications of experiential learning to teaching collaboration

  • Dave Gosselin
  • Sara Cooper
  • Sydney Lawton
  • Ronald J Bonnstetter
  • Bill J Bonnstetter
Article
  • 188 Downloads

Abstract

Higher education is being confronted with a paradigm shift that is forcing it to collectively reexamine their ability to develop graduates who have relevant professional competencies. Collaboration and team work are competencies that are sought after by many employers. The creation of effective collaboration is critical to developing the interdisciplinary linkages that are necessary to confront the many environmental challenges posed by human activities and prepare today’s students to meet future intellectual and workforce demands. To address the challenge of developing collaboration skills, the Environmental Studies (ES) program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) used a backward curriculum design, multiple modalities of experiential learning, and a reflective action research approach to develop collaboration and teamwork skills in undergraduate students. The ES program partnered with Target Training International Ltd. (TTI), to gain insights into the use of their instruments as boundary objects to help student’s understand self and create interdisciplinary teams. Through the use of an instrument, the TriMetrix®, the UNL-ES program is taking a page from the business world and partnering with it to help students understand themselves, adapt their behaviors to more effectively work in a team, and be introduced to the concept of assessments and their use in the professional world. These assessments played a positive role in the dynamics of each group, some more than others. The analyses of these data for this class have informed us about how to improve the use of the assessment output in class. Specifically, we can use these data as specific examples in debriefing future classes. We have also identified certain mixtures of behavioral styles and motivational drivers that may be problematic to group work. Many students have experienced team projects. However, most students have not explicitly had to learn about the factors that go into effective collaboration or they have never been explicitly explained to them. This is particularly the case with regard to processes of developing shared responsibility.

Keywords

Assessment Boundary objects Collaboration Teamwork Course design TriMetrix Target training international Content mastery 

References

  1. Arum R, Roksa J (2011) Academically adrift: limited learning on college campuses. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashcraft D, Treadwell T (2008) The social psychology of online collaborative learning: the good, the bad, and the awkward. In: Orvis K, Lassiter A (eds) Computer-supported collaborative learning: best practices and principles for instructors. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 140–163. doi:10.4018/978-1-59,904-753-9.ch007
  3. Bedwell WL, Fiore SM, Salas E (2011) S.M. developing the 21st century (and beyond) workforce: a review of interpersonal skills & measurement strategies http://www7.national-academies.org/bota/21st_Century_Workshop_Salas_Fiore_Paper.pdf Last Viewed: November 21, 2012
  4. Bellanca J, Brandt R (2010) 21st century skills: rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  5. Bixler BA (2008) The effects of scaffolding student’s problem-solving process via question prompts on problem solving and intrinsic motivation in an online learning environment. PhD diss., The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PennGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonnstetter BJ, Suiter JI (2013) DISC the universal language. Reference manual. Target training international, Scottsdale, Arizona 371pGoogle Scholar
  7. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (2000) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC 374 pGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang MM (2007) Enhancing Web-based language learning through self-monitoring. J Comp Assist Learn 23:187–196Google Scholar
  9. Chung S, Chung MJ, Severance C (1999) October. Design of support tools and knowledge building in a virtual university course: effect of reflection and self-explanation prompts. Paper presented at the WebNet 99 World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceedings, Honolulu, Hawaii. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED448706)Google Scholar
  10. Crippen KJ, Earl BL (2007) The impact of Web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy. Computers & Education 49(3):809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Department of Education, US (DOE) (2009) Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies (B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, & K. Jones, Eds.). Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education website: http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
  12. Gosselin DC, Levy RH, Bonnstetter RJ (2003) Utilizing Earth science research to improve understanding between scientists and educators. J Geosci Ed 51:114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gosselin DC, Thomas J, Redmond A, Larson-Miller C, Yendra s, Bonnstetter R, Slater TF (2010) Laboratory Earth: a model of online K-12 teacher coursework. J Geosci Ed 58:203–213Google Scholar
  14. Gosselin D, Cooper S, Bonnstetter RJ, Bonnstetter BJ (2013) Exploring the assessment of twenty-first century professional competencies of undergraduate students in environmental studies through a business—academic partnership. Environ Stud Sci 3:359–368. doi:10.1007/s13412-013-0140-1 Erratum J Environ Stud Sci (2014) 4:188–189, DOI 10.1007/s13412-014–0164-1
  15. Johnson A (2014) Pushing back entropy: moving teams from conflict to health. Restoration Publishing, ISBN: 978–0–9,893,390–1–8Google Scholar
  16. Livingston J A (1997) Metacognition: an overview. Retrieved January, 2009, from http://gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.htm
  17. Manduca C (2007) Improving instruction in mineralogy, petrology, and geochemistry—lessons from research on learning: Elements 3:95–100Google Scholar
  18. Marston WM (1928) The emotions of normal people. Harcourt, Brace&Co, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McTighe J. Wiggins G. (2012) Understanding by design framework. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Retrieved February 2015, http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf Google Scholar
  20. National Research Council (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson BC (2007) Exploring the use of individualized, reflective guidance in an educational multi-user virtual environment. J Sci Ed Tech 16:83–97Google Scholar
  22. Saito H, Miwa K (2007) Construction of a learning environment supporting learners’ reflection: a case of information seeking on the Web. Comp. & Ed. 49:214–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shen PD, Lee TH, Tsai CW (2007) Applying Web-enabled problem-based learning and self-regulated learning to enhance computing skills of Taiwan’s vocational students: a quasi-experimental study of a short-term module. Electronic J. e-Learning 5:147–156Google Scholar
  24. Social Entrepreneurs Inc. (2011) Building and sustaining effective collaborations—research brief. Retrieved February 2015, from http://alliancefornevadanonprofits.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Research-Brief-Building-and-Sustaining-Collaborations.pdf
  25. Spranger E (1928) Types of men: the psychology and ethics of personality. [translation by Pigors P J W, Trans.] NewYork: G.E. Stechert Company; [Original work by Lebensformen; Halle (Saale): Niemeyer, 1914]Google Scholar
  26. Vincent S, Focht W (2010) In search of common ground: exploring identity and the possibility of core competencies for interdisciplinary environmental programs. Env Prac 12:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weik A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6 Google Scholar
  28. Zemsky R (2009) Making Reform Work. Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dave Gosselin
    • 1
  • Sara Cooper
    • 1
  • Sydney Lawton
    • 1
  • Ronald J Bonnstetter
    • 2
  • Bill J Bonnstetter
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Studies ProgramUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Target Training International, Ltd.ScottsdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations