Skip to main content

Environmental studies and environmental science today: inevitable mission creep and integration in action-oriented transdisciplinary areas of inquiry, training and practice

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences volume 5, pages 70–78 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Since the 1970s when the first “named” environmental studies (ENST) and environmental science (ENSC) training programs emerged to tackle the growing crises facing the natural world and humanity, those two areas of inquiry and practice have remained rather distinct. However, as the complexity of environmental problems grows, it is apparent that transdisciplinary perspectives and teams represent the only means to identify and implement effective solutions. Despite the fact that ENST and ENSC programs often exist at the same institution, they tend to be housed in different faculties (i.e. ENST is often in humanities and social sciences, whereas ENSC is often in science). We argue that, as the demand for broadly trained highly qualified personnel able to work in all aspects of problem identification and solutions increases, neither ENST nor ENSC on their own is sufficient to achieve desirable policy and management outcomes. Those in ENST increasingly are expected to be competent in evidence assimilation and analysis, while those in ENSC are expected to recognize the value of the human dimension and embrace their role as knowledge brokers well versed in policy and management. The days of distinct ENST and ENSC programs are numbered as we re-envision how we think about, teach and practice ENST and ENSC. Failure to integrate these areas of inquiry will retard their collective ability to achieve the outcomes that are so needed in the face of dramatic human-induced rapid environmental change. The inherent overlap of ENST and ENSC must be embraced which means modulating our thinking, training and practice related to the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Allen GM, Gould EM (1986) Complexity, wickedness and public forests. J For 84:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch J, Shore BM (1975) Conservation behavior as the outcome of environmental education. J Environ Educ 6:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auer MR (2010) Communication and competition in environmental studies. Policy Sci 43:365–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balint PJ, Stewart RE, Desai A, Walters LC (2011) Wicked environmental problems: managing uncertainty and conflict. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bardwell LV (1991) Problem-framing: a perspective on environmental problem-solving. Environ Manag 15:603–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda LE, Poff LN, Tague C, Palmer MA, Pizzuto J, Cooper S, Stanley E, Moglen G (2002) How to avoid train wrecks when using science in environmental problem solving. Bioscience 52:1127–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet A, Bennet D, Fafard K, Fonda M, Lomond T, Messier L, Vaugeois N (2007) Knowledge mobilization in the social sciences and humanities. MQI Press, Frost

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman TD, Tsou A, Ni C, Sugimoto CR (2014) Post-interdisciplinary frames of reference: exploring permeability and perceptions of disciplinarity in the social sciences. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1338-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RL (2007) How to think about environmental studies. J Philos Educ 41:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi BC, Pak AW (2006) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Invest Med 29:351–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark SG, Steelman TA (2013) Interviewing for an interdisciplinary job: principled goals, pragmatic outcomes, and finding the right fit in academia. J Environ Stud Sci 3:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SG, Rutherford MB, Auer MR, Cherney DN, Wallace RL, Mattson DJ et al (2011a) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 1): integrating knowledge, education, and action for a better world? Environ Manag 47:701–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SG, Rutherford MB, Auer MR, Cherney DN, Wallace RL, Mattson DJ et al (2011b) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 2): strategies for improvement. Environ Manag 47:716–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SG, Steen-Adams MM, Pfirman S, Wallace RL (2011c) Professional development of interdisciplinary environmental scholars. J Environ Stud Sci 1:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ (2011) On the basic-applied continuum in ecology and evolution and a call to action—perspectives of an early career researcher in academia. Ideas Ecol Evol 4:37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper A (2010) Knowledge brokers—a promising knowledge mobilization strategy to increase research use and its impact in education. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto

  • De Young R (1993) Changing behavior and making it stick: the conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environ Behav 25:485–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy F, Segers M, Van den Bossche P, Gijbels D (2003) Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learn Instr 13:533–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher ARH, Tobi H, Ronteltap A (2011) When natural met social: a review of collaboration between the natural and social sciences. Interdisc Sci Rev 36:341–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2010) How resilient are ecosystems to global environmental change? Sustain Sci 5:151–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortuin KK, van Koppen CK, Kroeze CC (2013) The contribution of systems analysis to training students in cognitive interdisciplinary skills in environmental science education. J Environ Stud Sci 3:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Söderqvist T (2001) Enhancing transdisciplinary dialogue in curricula development. Ecol Econ 38:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R (1987) Living with uncertainty in resource management. N Am J Fish Manag 7:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huesemann MH (2001) Can pollution problems be effectively solved by environmental science and technology? An analysis of critical limitations. Ecol Econ 37:271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford HR, Volk TL (1990) Changing learner behavior through environmental education. J Environ Educ 21:8–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey P (2003) Smoothing the waters observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Soc Stud Sci 33:539–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer RW (2002) Weaving traditional ecological knowledge into biological education: a call to action. Bioscience 52:432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig D, Hilborn R, Walters C (1993) Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Science (Washington) 260:17

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniates MF, Whissel JC (2000) Environmental studies: the sky is not falling. Bioscience 50:509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocchi F (2006) Western science and traditional knowledge. EMBO Rep 7:463–466

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe MC, Andrews E, Biedenweg K (2008) A framework for environmental education strategies. Appl Environ Educ Commun 6:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morillo F, Bordons M, Gómez I (2003) Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 54:1237–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell B, Crumley CL, Hassan N, Lambin EF, Pahl-Wostl C, Underdal A, Wasson R (2005) A conceptual template for integrative human–environment research. Glob Environ Chang 15:299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N (2004) Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it? Environ Sci Pol 7:369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington DD (2008) Cross-disciplinary collaboration and learning. Ecol Soc 13

  • Rhoten D, Parker A (2004) Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science (Washington) 306:2046

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield PL (1992) The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med 35:1343–1357

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryser L, Halseth G, Thien D (2009) Strategies and intervening factors influencing student social interaction and experiential learning in an interdisciplinary research team. Res High Educ 50:248–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salwasser H (2004) Confronting the implications of wicked problems: changes needed in Sierra Nevada National Forest planning and problem solving. In: Proceedings of the Sierra Nevada science symposium: science for management and conservation. General technical report PSW-GTR-193. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Albany, California (pp. 7–22)

  • Sankar P, Jones NL, Karlawish J (2007) Evaluating existing and emerging connections among interdisciplinary researchers. Bioscience 57:965–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Pol 7:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz P (2011) Conservation means behavior. Conserv Biol 25:1080–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager TP (2008) The sustainability spectrum and the sciences of sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 17:444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smardon RC (2011) Developing a national framework for internal/external review of undergraduate environmental studies/environmental science programmes. Interdiscip Environ Rev 12:244–257. doi:10.1504/IER.2011.041821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé EM, Press D (1998) What is environmental studies? BioScience 48:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (1993) A second environmental science: human-environment interactions. Science 260:1897–1899

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto CR, Ni C, Russell TG, Bychowski B (2011) Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: an examination of dissertation networks in Library and Information Science. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 62:1808–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner S (2000) What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different? In: Weingart P, Stehr N (eds) Practising interdisciplinarity. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 46–65

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (1998) Report of the fourth meeting of the parties to the convention on biodiversity. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, UNEP/CBD/COP/4/27

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kerkhoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Pol 8:452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent S, Focht W (2011) Interdisciplinary environmental education: elements of field identity and curriculum design. J Environ Stud Sci 1:14–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner WE, Champion E (2012) Sustain J Rec 5:248–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Cooke and Vermaire are supported by Carleton University. Cooke is further supported by NSERC and the Canada Research Chairs Program. We thank our students and colleagues in ENST and ENSC for helping to shape our vision. Jon Midwood and Vivian Nguyen kindly provided comments on a draft version of this manuscript, and Maja Cvetkovic assisted with manuscript formatting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Steven J. Cooke & Jesse C. Vermaire

  2. Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Steven J. Cooke

  3. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Jesse C. Vermaire

Authors
  1. Steven J. Cooke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesse C. Vermaire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Cooke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cooke, S.J., Vermaire, J.C. Environmental studies and environmental science today: inevitable mission creep and integration in action-oriented transdisciplinary areas of inquiry, training and practice. J Environ Stud Sci 5, 70–78 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0220-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0220-x

Keywords

  • Environmental studies
  • Environmental science
  • Transdisciplinary
  • Integration