Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 490–502 | Cite as

Green cities and ivory towers: how do higher education sustainability initiatives shape millennials’ consumption practices?

  • Ethan D. SchoolmanEmail author
  • Mike Shriberg
  • Sarah Schwimmer
  • Marie Tysman


College-educated millennials, motivated by a preference for vibrant, walkable neighborhoods with access to good public transportation, are helping to drive an economic resurgence in many American cities. At the same time, institutions of higher education (IHEs) are seeking to contribute to sustainable societies by encouraging students to incorporate principles of environmental responsibility into personal consumption practices. Popular writing on the urban migration of millennials—the generation born after 1982—has frequently celebrated the presumed environmental benefits of cities not designed around the automobile. Yet, little research has examined how, if at all, IHE efforts to shape student consumption practices may impact the sustainability of urban areas where many millennials are choosing to live and work. In this paper, we use survey and qualitative data on undergraduates at a large, public university to compare millennials’ commitment to different forms of sustainable consumption to their preference for particular urban forms. We find that student commitment to practicing sustainable consumption in their adult lives is weakest in an area crucial to the global ecological footprint of urban areas: how food is produced and consumed. We also find that evidence for IHE impact on student attitudes and practices related to any form of sustainable consumption is surprisingly lacking. We conclude by suggesting that IHEs have not yet realized their full potential to prepare millennials to be environmentally responsible citizens of sustainable cities, particularly where participation in food systems is concerned.


Sustainable consumption Millennials Higher education Cities Sustainability 



The authors wish to acknowledge the Graham Sustainability Institute and the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan for their financial and in-kind contributions to this study. The Dow Sustainability Fellows Program and the Erb Institute for Global Sustainable Enterprise supported the postdoctoral fellowship of the lead author. John Callewaert and Robert Marans provided valuable input and are the lead researchers for the Sustainability Cultural Indicators Program. The 2011–2012 University of Michigan Planet Blue Student Leaders facilitated the focus groups analyzed in this paper with enthusiasm and dedication.


  1. Alberti M (1996) Measuring urban sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16:381–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti M (1999) Urban patterns and environmental performance: what do we know? J Plan Educ Res 19:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Public Transportation Association (2014) Millennials and mobility: understanding the millennial mindset.Google Scholar
  4. Bannister D, Watson S, Wood C (1997) Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form. Environ Plan B Plan Des 24:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barth M, Godemann J, Rieckmann M, Stoltenberg U (2007) Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. Int J Sustain High Educ 8:416–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger M (2014) The unsustainable city. Sustain 6:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnstein E, Gallagher M (2014) The revitalization of American central cities: fact or fiction?Google Scholar
  8. Camagni R, Gibelli MC, Rigamonti P (2002) Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecol Econ 40:199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carew AL, Mitchell CA (2002) Characterizing undergraduate engineering students’ understanding of sustainability. Eur J Eng Educ 27:349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassie R (2014) Baltimore 2.0: How the millennial generation and a new “sharing economy” are transforming the way cities function. Baltim Mag.Google Scholar
  11. Castellani V, Sala S (2013) Sustainability indicators integrating consumption patterns in strategic environmental assessment for urban planning. Sustain 5:3426–3446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke A (2006) The campus environmental management system cycle in practice: 15 years of environmental management, education and research at Dalhousie University. Int J Sustain High Educ 7:374–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Compton J, Pollak RA (2007) Why are power couples increasingly concentrated in large metropolitan areas? J Labor Econ 25:475–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa DL, Kahn ME (2000) Power couples: changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. Q J Econ 115:1287–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies SA, Edmister JH, Sullivan K, West CK (2003) Educating sustainable societies for the twenty-first century. Int J Sustain High Educ 4:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickerson CA, Thibodeau R, Aronson E, Miller D (1992) Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. J Appl Soc Psychol 22:841–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doughty MRC, Hammond GP (2004) Sustainability and the built environment at and beyond the city scale. Build Environ 39:1223–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Earl C, Lawrence A (2003) The campus community and the concept of sustainability: an assessment of college of Charleston student perceptions. Chrestomathy Annu Rev Undergrad Res Coll Charlest 2:85–102Google Scholar
  19. Echenique MH, Hargreaves AJ, Mitchell G, Namdeo A (2012) Growing cities sustainably. J Am Plann Assoc 78:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emanuel R, Adams JN (2011) College students’ perceptions of campus sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ 12:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flint A (2014) What millennials want—and why cities are right to pay them so much attention.Google Scholar
  22. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habron G (2012) Competency-based sustainability specialization at Michigan State University. Sustain J Rec 5:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen SS, Bucki J, Lee J (2011) Engaging the campus community through participatory sustainability strategic planning. Sustain J Rec 4:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haraldsson HV, Ranhagen U, Sverdrup H (2001) Is eco-living more sustainable than conventional living? Comparing sustainability performances between two townships in southern Sweden. J Environ Plan Manag 44:663–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hendee C (2014) Millennials’ desires are reshaping Denver development plans.Google Scholar
  27. Kagawa F (2007) Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: implications for curriculum change. Int J Sustain High Educ 8:317–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mallach A (2014) The march of the millennial generation to the cities is real.Google Scholar
  29. Marans RW, Edelstein JY (2010) The human dimension of energy conservation and sustainability: a case study of the University of Michigan’s energy conservation program. Int J Sustain High Educ 11:6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGranahan G, Satterthwaite D (2003) Urban centers: an assessment of sustainability. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:243–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McMillan EE, Wright T, Beazley K (2004) Impact of a university-level environmental studies class on students’ values. J Environ Educ 35:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muñiz I, Galindo A (2005) Urban form and the ecological footprint of commuting. The case of Barcelona. Ecol Econ 55:499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neilson (2014) Millennials: breaking the myths.Google Scholar
  34. Newman PWG (1999) Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. Landsc Urban Plan 44:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newman P (2006) The environmental impact of cities. Environ Urban 18:275–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orr D (1991) What is education for? Six myths about the foundations of modern education, and six new principles to replace them. Context 27:52–55Google Scholar
  37. Peri G (2002) Young workers, learning, and agglomerations. J Urban Econ 52:582–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pike L, Shannon T, Lawrimore K, McGee A et al (2003) Science education and sustainability initiatives: a campus recycling case study shows the importance of opportunity. Int J Sustain High Educ 4:218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Press M, Caires M, Patton T (2010) Campus sustainability through civic engagement at the University of Wyoming. Sustain 3:115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urban 4:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rees W, Wackernagel M (1996) Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable—and why they are a key to sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16:223–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rockefeller Foundation (2014) Rockefeller millennials survey (New York, NY)Google Scholar
  43. Sander W (2006) Educational attainment and residential location. Educ Urban Soc 38:307–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Satterthwaite D (2008) Cities’ contribution to global warming: notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Urban 20:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharp L (2009) Higher education: the quest for the sustainable campus. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 5:1–8Google Scholar
  46. Shelby J, Tregoning H, Ways H (2014) How are millennials changing planning? (Atlanta, GA)Google Scholar
  47. University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (1990) Report and declaration of the Presidents Conference (1990)Google Scholar
  48. van Weenen H (2000) Towards a vision of a sustainable university. Int J Sustain High Educ 1:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woodhouse K (2013) Find out where they go: University of Michigan graduates leaving tree city for the big city. Ann Arbor NewsGoogle Scholar
  50. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future: report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (United Nations)Google Scholar
  51. Wu J (2010) Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landsc Ecol 25:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeev S, Meidad K, Avinoam M (2014) A multi-spatial scale approach to urban sustainability—an illustration of the domestic and global hinterlands of the city of Beer-Sheva. Land Use PolicyGoogle Scholar
  53. Zsóka Á, Szerényi ZM, Széchy A, Kocsis T (2013) Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. J Clean Prod 48:126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ethan D. Schoolman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mike Shriberg
    • 2
  • Sarah Schwimmer
    • 3
  • Marie Tysman
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Natural Resources and Environment and Erb Institute for Global Sustainable EnterpriseUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Graham Sustainability Institute and Program in the EnvironmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Graham Sustainability InstituteUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.University of California-BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  5. 5.Graham Sustainability InstituteUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations