Advertisement

Global fisheries governance beyond the State: unraveling the effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council

  • Agni KalfagianniEmail author
  • Philipp Pattberg
Article

Abstract

Marine ecosystems are increasingly under pressure. Despite commitments by governments and intergovernmental organizations, such as the 1995 United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement and the 1995 Food and Agriculture Organisation Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries Practices, the depletion of marine resources has intensified over the past 40 years. In this context, a number of non-state market-based governance schemes have emerged that attempt to mitigate the ongoing marine crisis through certifying sustainable fisheries. In this article, we investigate the effects of one of the most prominent private organizations in global fisheries governance, the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). Specifically, we evaluate the role of the MSC in addressing the worldwide decline in fish stocks and examine broader political and socio-economic effects that are often associated with the emergence and implementation of private rules and standards. With this analysis, we aim to unravel the conditions under which the MSC can contribute to more sustainable and equitable fisheries management at regional and global levels.

Keywords

Global fisheries governance Marine Stewardship Council Policy effectiveness Marine ecosystems 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank D.G. Webster and Will Burns for insightful comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank Daniel Hendrichs for valuable research assistance.

References

  1. Auld G, Gulbrandsen LH, McDermott CL (2008) Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry. Annu Rev Environ Resour 33:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biermann, F. et al. (2009) Studying the influence of international bureaucracies: a conceptual framework. In: F. Biermann and B. Siebenhüner (eds), Managers of global change. Cambridge, MIT Press 37–74Google Scholar
  3. Brécard D, Hlaimi B, Lucas S, Perraudeau Y, Salladerré F (2009) Determinants of demand for green products: an application of eco-label demand for fish in Europe. Ecol Econ 69:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breitmeier H, Young OR, Zürn M (2006) Analyzing International Environmental Regimes: From Case Study to Database MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  5. Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatisation of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 15(4):503–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clapp J (2001) Toxic exports. The transfer of hazardous wastes from rich to poor countries. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  7. Contsnace DH, Bonano AA (2000) Regulating the global fisheries: The World Wildlife Fund, Unilever and the Marine Stewardship Council. Agriculture and Human Values 17:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dingwerth K, Pattberg P (2007) Wirkungen Transnationaler Umweltregime. In: Jacob K, Biermann F, Busch PO, Feindt PH (eds) Politik und Umwelt. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp 133–156Google Scholar
  9. Falkner R (2003) Private environmental governance and international relations: exploring the links. Global Environ Politics 3(2):72–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations) (2010) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome, FAOGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuchs, D. and A. Kalfagianni (2012) The effectiveness of private environmental governance. In: Peter Dauvergne (ed). Handbook of global environmental politics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuchs D, Kalfagianni A, Arentsen M (2009) Retail power, private standards and sustainability in the global food system. In: Clapp J, Fuchs D (eds) Agro-food corporations, global governance and sustainability. MIT Press, Boston, pp 29–59Google Scholar
  13. Fuchs D, Kalfagianni A, and Havinga T (2011) Actors in private food governance: the legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and human values 28(3) http://springerlink.com/content/m237228605223463/
  14. Goyert W, Sagarin R, Annala J (2010) The promise and pitfalls of Marine Stewardship Council certification: Maine lobster as a case study. Marine Policy 34:1103–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gulbrandsen HL (2009) The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Marine Policy 33:654–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gulbrandsen HL (2010) Transnational environmental governance: the emergence and effects of the certification of forests and fisheries. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  17. Gullison RE (2003) Does forest certification conserve biodiversity? Oryx 37:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guthman J (2007) The Polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode 39(3):456–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen HK, Salskov-Iversen D (2008) Critical perspectives on private authority in global politics. Palgrave MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Idlebrook C (2010) Canadian and U.S. fisheries pursue seafood certification. The working waterfront December 2010–January 2011 (http://www.workingwaterfront.com/articles/Canadian-and-US-fisheries-pursue-seafood-certification/14110/) Accessed on 24 Nov 2010)
  21. Iles A (2007) Making the seafood industry more sustainable: creating production chain transparency and accountability. J Clean Prod 15:577–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacquet JL, Pauly D (2007) The rise of seafood awareness campaigns in an era of collapsing fisheries. Marine Policy 31:308–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacquet JL, Pauly D (2010) Seafood stewardship in crisis. Nature 467:28–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaiser MJ, Edward-Jones G (2006) The role of ecolabeling in fisheries management and conservation. Conserv Biol 20(2):392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalfagianni A, Fuchs D (2013) The effectiveness of retail governance for sustainability. In Tetty Havinga (ed.) Regulation in the age of crisis, London: Routledge (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  26. Kalfagianni A and Pattberg P (2011) The effectiveness of transnational rule-setting organisations in global sustainability politics: an analytical framework. Global governance working paper no 43 Amsterdam et al.: The Global Governance Project. Available at www.glogov.org
  27. Kalfagianni A, Pattberg P (2013) Fishing in Muddy Waters? Conditions for Effective Private Governance in Fisheries and Aquaculture. Marine Policy 38: 124-132Google Scholar
  28. Klooster D (2005) Environmental certification of forests in Mexico: the political ecology of nongovernmental market intervention. Annals of Am Geographers 96:541–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leadbitter D, Gomez G, McGilvray F (2006) Sustainable fisheries and the East Asian seas: can the private sector play a role? Ocean and Coastal Manage 49:662–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lopuch M (2008) Benefits of certification for small-scale fisheries. In: Ward T, Phillips B (eds) Seafood ecolabelling. Principles and practice. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayer F and Gereffi G (2010) Regulation and economic globalization. Prospects and limits of private governance. Business and Politics 12(3), Article 11Google Scholar
  32. McDermott C, Noah E, Cashore B (2008) Differences that “matter”? A framework for comparing environmental certification standards and government policies. J Environ Policy Plan 10:47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miles LE, Underdal A, Andresen S, Wettestad J, Birger Skjaerseth J, Carlin EM (2002) Environmental regime effectiveness. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchell R (2006) Problem structure, institutional design and the relative effectiveness of international environmental agreements. Global Environmental Politics 6(3):72–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MSC (2009) Get certified! A practical guide to the Marine Stewardship Council’s fishery certification process, http://www.msc.org/documents/get-certified/fisheries/MSC_Get%20certified_FINAL_lowres.pdf (25 Oct 2011)
  36. MSC (2011) Newsroom: latest research shows leap in public awareness of the MSC ecolabel, http://www.msc.org/newsroom/news/latest-research-shows-leap-in-public-awareness-of-the-msc-ecolabel (23 Feb 2011)
  37. Muradian R, Pelupessy W (2005) Governing the coffee chain: the role of voluntary regulatory systems. World Dev 33(12):2029–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neis, B.L (1996) Cut adrift. Samudra. Report Number 16, November 1996Google Scholar
  39. Oosterveer P (2008) Governing global fish provisioning: ownership and management of marine resources. Ocean and Coastal Manage 51:797–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Owens CM (2008) Sustainable seafood labelling: an analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council. Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies. University of California, San Diego, IR/PS Case # 07–02 http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~hiscox/Owens.pdf Accessed 10 November 2008
  41. Pattberg P (2005) The Forest Stewardship Council: risk and potential of private forestry governance. J Environ and Dev 14(3):356–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pattberg P (2006) Private governance and the South: lessons from global forestry politics. Third World Quarterly 27(4):579–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pearce F (2003) Can ocean friendly labels save dwindling stocks? New Scientist 178:5Google Scholar
  44. Pérez-Ramirez MA, Salvador LC (2010) Fisheries certification in Latin America: recent issues and perspectives. Interciencia 35(11):855–861Google Scholar
  45. Ponte S (2008) Greener than thou: the political economy of fish ecolabelling and its local manifestations in South Africa. World Dev 36(1):159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prakash A, Potoski M (2007) Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: a club theory perspective. Policy Studies J 35(4):773–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raynolds L, Murray D (2007) Fair trade: the challenges of transforming globalization. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Samudra (2004) Green fisheries in crisis. March 2004, volume 37Google Scholar
  49. Sharma L, Teret S, Brownell K (2010) The food industry and self-regulation: standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. Am J Public Health 100(2):240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stamford J (2010) Sodexo hits target of MSC certification for 929 sites (http://www.caterersearch.com/Articles/2010/12/09/336200/sodexo-hits-target-of-msc-certification-for-929-sites.htm) (Accessed on 02.02.2011)
  51. Sutton D (2003) An unsatisfactory encounter with the MSC—a conservation perspective. In: Phillips B, Ward T, Chaffee C (eds) Ecolabeling in fisheries: what is it all about? Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 114–119Google Scholar
  52. Teisl MF, Roe B, Levy AS (2002) Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. J Environ Econ Manag 43:339–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Underdal A (2002) One question, two answers. In: Miles et al (eds) Environmental regime effectiveness. 3, 46Google Scholar
  54. Wolf D (2005) State aid control at the national, European and international level. In: Zürn M, Joerges C (eds) Law and governance in postnational Europe: compliance beyond the nation-state. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Zürn M, Neyer J (2005) Conclusions: the conditions of compliance. In: Zürn M, Joerges C (eds) Law and governance in postnational Europe: compliance beyond the nation-state. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.2985 Department Environmental Policy Analysis, Institute for Environmental StudiesVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations