Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organization (SPRFMO): an improved model of decision-making for fisheries conservation?

  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Living Resources in the South Pacific Ocean recently entered into force. The new South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organization (SPRFMO) that it creates will face key challenges in the conservation and management of critical commercial fish stocks in the region. Among the most important species under management is the Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus). The SPRFMO regime was designed to avoid, or at least lessen, some of the major difficulties experienced by other RFMOs around the world. One of its features is a stricter standard for utilizing the objection procedure in the decision-making of the organization. The Orange Roughy is harvested by the destructive bottom-trawling method which poses a significant threat to South Pacific seamounts. The status of the Orange Roughy, and the protection of these seamounts, will likely be a barometer of SPRFMO success. The SPRFMO may provide an improved model for decision-making and organizational effectiveness in commercial fisheries on the high seas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. New Zealand Forest and Bird (Jack Mackerel), at http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/what-we-do/publications/-best-fish-guide-/jack-mackerel (accessed June 21, 2011). Although the Jack Mackerel is the premier commercial species under the SPRFMO, its status often receives less attention from NGOs than the Orange Roughy. The weakening status of the Jack Mackerel, however, is now noted with increasing frequency.

  2. Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch (Orange Roughy), at http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/SeafoodWatch/web/sfw_factsheet.aspx?gid=14 (accessed June 21, 2011). The Monterey Bay Aquarium maintains lists of sustainable and unsustainable seafood which consumers may use to guide their choices.

  3. Reclaiming their Heritage, Far Eastern Economic Review, Sept. 15, 1988; 141, 37 ABI/INFORM Global, p. 36. The realization by Maori of rights to fisheries and land was largely celebrated in New Zealand society.

  4. Eloise Gibson, The Seas are Dying and NZ Not Helping: Expert, New Zealand Herald, Feb. 26, 2010, available at http://www.nzherald.co.nz/news/print.cfm?objectid=10628546 (accessed July 6, 2011) (highlighting shortcomings in New Zealand’s marine conservation strategies, including the Orange Roughy fishery).

  5. Bill Moore, NZ Fishing Boss Calls for Action: Talley Launches Verbal Attack on Green Activism, The Nelson Mail, May 24, 2011, page 1 (highlighting the economic potential of Maori fisheries and rejecting actions by conservation groups to limit it).

  6. Sylvia Earle, If the Sea is in Trouble, We are All in Trouble, The Independent, June 21, 2011, Page 2 (world-renown advocate for marine conservation Sylvia Earle emphasizes the human impact on the oceans and the potential consequences).

References

Books

  • Barrett S (2003) Environment and statecraft. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

  • Birnie P, Boyle A (2002) International law and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

  • Burke W (1994) The New International Law of Fisheries: UNCLOS 1982 and beyond. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill RR, Lowe AV (1999) The law of the sea (3d.). Juris, Manchester University Press, Yonkers, NY

  • Nellemann C, Hain S, Alder J, (eds) (2008) In: Dead water: merging of climate change with pollution, over-harvest, and infestations in the world’s fishing grounds. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Schiffman HS (2008) Marine conservation agreements: the law and policy of reservations and vetoes. Martinus Nijhoff-Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

Conventions/Treaties

Institutional Reports

Scholarly Articles

  • Clark BC, Hemmings AD (2001) Problems and prospects for the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources twenty years on. J Int Wildl Law Policy 4:47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Day C, Emanuel D (2010) Lack of diversification and the value of Maori fisheries assets. N Z Econ Pap 44:61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzidzornu DM (2002) Marine environment protection under regional conventions: limits to the contribution of procedural norms. Ocean Dev Int L 33:263–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson D, Moyer CL (2010) Microbiology of seamounts. Oceanogr 23:148–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Annala J, Holland DS (2006) The cost of overfishing and management strategies for new fisheries on slow-growing fish: Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in New Zealand. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 63:2149–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koslow JA, Gowlett-Holmes K, Lowry JK, O’Hara T, Poore GCB, Williams A (2001) Seamount benthic macrofauna off Tasmania: community structure and impacts of trawling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 213:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon PA, Kirk NA (2011) Maori commercial fisheries governance in Aotearoa/New Zealand within the bounds of a neoliberal fisheries management regime. Asia Pac Viewp 52:106–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossop J (2009) Law of the sea and fisheries. N Z Yearb of Int Law 7:336–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ, Clark MR, Morato T, Watson R (2010) Seamount fisheries: do they have a future? Oceanogr 23:134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock JGA (2001) The uniqueness of Aotearoa. Proc Am Philos Soc 145:482–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Prows P (2008) A mouse can roar: small island states, the United Nations, and the end of free-for-all fishing on the high seas. Colo J Int Environ Law Policy 19:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman DJ (2006) Seizing the cultural and political moment and catching fish: political development of Maori in New Zealand, the Sealord Fisheries Settlement, and social movement theory. Soc Sci J 43:513–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toki VVT (2010) Adopting a Maori property rights approach to fisheries. N Z J Environ Law 14:197–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace C, Weeber B (2003) The devil and the deep sea—economics, institutions and incentives: the theory and the New Zealand quota management experience in the deep sea, Deep Sea 2003: FAO Conference on the Governance and Management of Deep Sea Fisheries, available at http: http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/a0210e/a0210e0s.htm#bm28 (accessed July 6, 2011)

  • Worm B et al (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Sci 325:578–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Miscellaneous

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Fulbright New Zealand and Waikato University Law School for its generous support of this research. Much of this research was completed when the author was a Visiting Fulbright Scholar at Waikato University Law School in 2010. The views expressed are solely the author’s.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Howard S. Schiffman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schiffman, H.S. The South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organization (SPRFMO): an improved model of decision-making for fisheries conservation?. J Environ Stud Sci 3, 209–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0111-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0111-6

Keywords

Navigation