Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 291–295 | Cite as

Resurrecting the conservation movement

Article

Abstract

Conservationists are losing the battle to protect nature because they are failing to connect with the hearts, anxieties, and minds of a large segment of the American public. If conservationists are to move beyond their current base of support, they must reach out and connect to new audiences across the political, economic, and social spectra. Here, we present data from two national surveys examining attitudes about the protection of nature. These surveys show that the public does not believe a tradeoff necessarily exists between the health of the economy and the health of the environment. Moreover, certain groups, including those who do not identify themselves as environmentalists, find benefits to people to be a convincing rationale for protecting nature, and a better rationale than the intrinsic value of nature. Based on these findings, we recommend conservationists vigorously challenge claims that environmental protection will damage the economy. We also recommend a new message frame that emphasizes the value of protecting nature in terms of benefits to people, and to highlight the connection between protecting land and water and preserving their immediate quality of life and their children’s quality of life.

Keywords

Conservation Ecosystem services Public opinion 

References

  1. ABC News/Planet Green/Stanford University (2008) Fuel costs boost conservation efforts; 7 in 10 reducing “carbon footprint”. http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1067a1Environment2008.pdf.
  2. Angermeier PL (2000) The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conserv Biol 14:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowman K, Rugg A (2010) Polls on the environment and global warming. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. http://www.aei.org/files/2010/04/22/20100422-Environment.pdf.
  4. Chameides WL (2011) EPA in the crosshairs. Science 332:397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kraft ME, Vig NJ (2013) Environmental policy over four decades: achievements and new directions. In: Vig NJ, Kraft ME (eds) Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century, 8th edn. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 2–29Google Scholar
  6. Kroeger T (2012) Dollars and sense: economic benefits and impacts from two oyster reef restoration projects in the the northern Gulf of Mexico. The Nature Conservancy. http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/oyster-restoration-study-kroeger.pdf.
  7. Leisher C, Beukering Pv, Scherl LM (2008) Nature’s investment bank: how marine protected areas contribute to poverty reduction. The Nature Conservancy/WWF International. http://www.nature.org/initiatives/protectedareas/files/mpa_report.pdf.
  8. McCauley DJ (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443:27–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ortman JM, Guarneri CE (2009) United States population projections: 2000 to 2050. United State Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/analytical-document09.pdf.
  11. Pabon-Zamora L (2009) Valuing nature: why Indonesia’s marine protected areas matter for economic and human wellbeing. The Nature Conservancy.Google Scholar
  12. Soulé M (1985) What is conservation biology? Bioscience 35:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Turner JM (2009) “The specter of environmentalism”: wilderness, environmental politics, and the evolution of the new right. J Am Hist 96:123–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. U.S. Census Bureau (2012) Most children younger than age 1 are minorities, census bureau reports. http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-90.html. Accessed August 22 2012
  15. White R (1996) Are you an environmentalist, or do you work for a living? In: Cronon W (ed) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. Norton, New York, pp 171–185Google Scholar
  16. Whittaker M, Segura GM, Bowler S (2005) Racial/ethnic group attitudes toward environmental protection in California: is “environmentalism” still a white phenomenon? Polit Res Q 58:435–447Google Scholar
  17. Yale Environment Survey (2004) The environmental deficit: survey on American attitudes on the environment. Yale University School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. http://environment.research.yale.edu/documents/downloads/v-z/yale_enviro_poll.pdf.

Copyright information

© AESS 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Studies and SciencesSanta Clara UniversitySanta ClaraUSA
  2. 2.Conservation CampaignsThe Nature ConservancyArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations