Skip to main content
Log in

Improving learning outcomes in large environmental science classrooms through short-term service-learning projects

  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted an investigation on the efficacy of service-learning in large environmental biology classes. We were interested in whether or not service-learning in classes with over 200 students has an impact on content learning, and attitudes/behaviors related to the content. Students completed a pre-survey, a service project, and reflection paper (experimental group), and a post-survey. Comparing pre- and post-surveys, student responses to attitude, and behavior questions revealed a positive impact on environmental worldview. Student confidence in understanding course content improved in the specific areas related to service projects. Overall, our study shows that large classroom learning is enhanced by short-term service-learning projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anaya G (1999) College Impact on Student Learning: Comparing the Use of Self-Reported Gains, Standardized Test Scores, and College Grades. Res High Educ 40:499–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin AW, Sax LJ (1998) How Undergraduates are Affected by Service Participation. J Coll Stud Dev 39(3):251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley EF, Cross KP, Major CH (2005) Collaborative learning techniques. A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss JA (1994) The effect of community service on the moral development of college ethics students. J Moral Dev 23(2):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campus Compact. (2008) Service Statistics 2008. Highlights and Trends from Campus Compact’s Annual Membership Survey

  • Cohen J, Kinsey DF (1994) Doing good and scholarship: a Service-Learning Study. J Educ 48(4):4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll A, Holland B, Gelmon S, Kerrigan S (1996) An assessment model for service-learning: comprehensive case studies of impact on faculty, students, community, and institutions. Mich J Community Serv Learn 3:66–71

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA. U.S. (2010). Energy Information Administration. Retail Gasoline Historical Prices. http://www.eia.doe.gov/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_history.html. Accessed 5/26/2010

  • Eyler JS, Giles DE Jr (1999) Where's the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs G, Lucas L, Simonte V (1996) Class size and student performance: 1984-94. Studies in Higher Ed 21:261–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray MJ, Ondaatje EH, Fricker R, Geschwind S, Goldman CA, Kaganoff T, Robyn A, Sundt M, Vogelgesang L, Klein SP (1998) Coupling Service and Learning in Higher Education: The Final Report of the Evaluation of the Learn and Serve America, Higher Education Program. The RAND Corporation

  • Hudson W (1996) Combining community service and the study of American public policy. Mich J Community Serv Learn 2:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser FG, Wolfing S, Fuhrere U (1999) Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Environ Psychol 19:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen C, Keen J (1998) Bonner Student Impact Survey. Bonner Foundation

  • Kendrick JR (1996) Outcomes of service-learning in an introduction to sociology course. Mich J Community Serv Learn 2:72–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior. Environ Educ Res 8:239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leege L, Cawthorn JM (2008) Environmental service learning reinforces classroom concepts and engenders environmental responsibility. Journal of College Science Teaching 37:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabry JB (1998) Pedagogical variations in service-learning and student outcomes: how time, contact and reflection matter. Mich J Community Serv Learn 5:32–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus GB, Howard JPF, King DC (1993) Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: results from an experiment. Educ Eval Policy Anal 15:410–419

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W (2008) Fostering sustainable behavior. In: An introduction to community-based social marketing. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, B.C. Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J (1994) Linking traditional and service-learning courses: outcome evaluation utilizing two pedagogically distinct models. Mich J Community Serv Learn 1:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Gwin RP, Mabry JB (1998) Service-learning as pedagogy and civic education: comparing outcome for three models. Teach Sociol 26:276–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike GR (1995) The relationship between self reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Res High Educ 3:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike GR (1996) Limitations of using students’ self-reports of academic development as proxies for traditional achievement measures. Res High Educ 37(1):89–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajecki DW (1982) Attitudes: themes and advances. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed VA, Christian-Jernstedt G, Hawley JK, Reber ES, DuBois CA (2005) Effects of a small-scale, very short-term service-learning experience on college students. J Adolesc 28(3):359–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour E, Wiese DJ, Hunter AB (2000) Creating a better mousetrap:On-line student assessment of their learning gains. Report to Exxon-Mobil Foundation; also Paper to National Meetings of the American Chemical Society, San Francisco, March 2000

  • Strage A (2000) Service-learning: enhancing student learning outcomes in a college level lecture course. Mich J Community Serv Learn 7:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon E, Stoecker R, Martin A, Seblonka K, Hilgendorf A, Nellis M (2008) The challenge of short-term service-learning. Mich J Community Serv Learn 14(2):16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelgesang LJ, Astin AW (2000) Comparing the effects of service-learning and community service. Mich J Community Serv Learn 7:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny L, Poh-Pheng Chua C, Aldrich C (2002) New ways of thinking about environmentalism: elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. J Soc Issues 56:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ray Chandler for help with statistical analysis. Robby Ambler facilitated the initial computer survey by posting it online and collecting and sending us the results. Our community partners, Keep Bulloch Beautiful, Ogeechee (Canoochee) Riverkeepers, and the Georgia Southern Botanical Garden, provided invaluable assistance. Without them we could not have completed this project. Thanks to two anonymous reviewers whose comments significantly improved our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Cawthorn.

Appendices

Appendix 1. Original Survery

Appendix 2. Relevant questions on SALG survey

Table 3 Relevant question on SALG survey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cawthorn, M., Leege, L. & Congdon, E. Improving learning outcomes in large environmental science classrooms through short-term service-learning projects. J Environ Stud Sci 1, 75–87 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0001-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0001-8

Keywords

Navigation