Levels of compliance of self-care practices of diabetes mellitus type 2 patients: a study from a tertiary care hospital of North India
- 11 Downloads
Diabetes management strategies are interdependent and comprise of three basic key elements: self-care activities, effective drug treatment, and adequate follow-up for early detection of complications. There is a need to assess the levels of self-care practices among diabetic patients and factors influencing them for developing better educational strategies to address the gaps identified. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the compliance for self-care activities of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, in a tertiary care hospital by using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) scale among 60 patients aged > 18 years. More than 90% of respondents were compliant for not eating high-fat foods, were not smoking, and were monitoring glucose regularly. One third of respondents were not taking proper foot care. After adjusting for confounders, the proportion of individuals who eat five or more servings of fruits and vegetables were significantly lower in middle and low socioeconomic status (SES) individuals as compared to high SES (middle SES OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.39; lower SES OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.60). Females were less likely to be involved in physical activity-related self-care activities as compared to males (minimum 30 min of physical activity: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08–0.92; specific exercise sessions: OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.52). The proportion of diabetics who follow proper foot care instructions were significantly lower among middle SES as compared to upper SES (checking of feet: OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.47; inspection of footwear: OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.48). There is a need to emphasize the importance of diet, physical activity, and foot care during the counseling sessions of diabetes mellitus type 2 patients.
KeywordsType 2 diabetes Self-care Cross-sectional study India
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Shahin Y, Kapur A, Khader A, Zeidan W, Harries AD, Nerup J, et al. Clinical audit on the provision of diabetes care in the primary care setting by United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). Journal of Diabetes Mellitus. 2015;5:15–20. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdm.2015.51002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Clark ML, Utz SW. Use of diabetes self-management instruments among rural African American populations. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research 2011;11(1):10.Google Scholar
- 18.Sarada V, Madhavi S, Madhavi DB. Knowledge and self care practices among type-2 diabetics attending tertiary care hospital, Visakhapatnam City. RGUHS National Journal of Public Health. 2016;1(1):6–9.Google Scholar
- 20.Priyanka CK, Angadi MM. Hospital-based KAP study on diabetes in Bijapur, Karnataka. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties. 2010;1(2):80–3.Google Scholar
- 22.Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Das AK, Deepa M, Bhansali A, Joshi SR, et al. Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India—results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5]. The International journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2014;11(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Joseph M, Gupta RD, Gangadhara P, Anand V, Volena R, Devanithi N, et al. Barriers to nutritional practices and dietary education in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in India. J Glob Diabetes Clin Metab. 2017;2(1):6.Google Scholar
- 28.Padma K, Bele SD, Bodhare TN, Valsangkar S. Evaluation of knowledge and self care practices in diabetic patients and their role in disease management. The National medical journal of India. 2012;3(1):3–6.Google Scholar
- 29.Chaurasia N, Mishra R, Ling H, Thapa B, Pokhre A, Kumar S, et al. A self care management awareness study among diabetes mellitus patients in rural Nepal. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2015;3(5A):67–71.Google Scholar
- 31.Imad ME-K, Gael AB, David CZ, Victoria CM, Daniel LG, Virginia D, et al. Diabetes in urban African Americans. V. Use of discussion groups to identify barriers to dietary therapy among low-income individuals with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes educator. 1996;22(5):488–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/014572179602200508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Shahi SK, Kumar A, Kumar S, Singh SK, Gupta SK, Singh TB. Prevalence of diabetic foot ulcer and associated risk factors in diabetic patients from North India. The Journal of Diabetic Foot Complications. 2012;4(3):83–91.Google Scholar
- 38.Bonner T, Foster M, Spears-Lanoix E. Type 2 diabetes-related foot care knowledge and foot self-care practice interventions in the United States: a systematic review of the literature. Diabetic Foot & Ankle 2016;7:103402/dfav729758 doi:103402/dfav7.29758.
- 41.Guidelines for Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, Research ICoM;2005.Google Scholar
- 42.National Family Health Survey-4. 2015–16. http://rchiips.org/NFHS/pdf/NFHS4/PB_FactSheet.pdf.