Screening for diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus camera in a Turkish population
- 6 Downloads
To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a diabetic population in Turkey using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Patients presenting to our diabetes screening center were evaluated by fundus photography using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Patients’ age at presentation, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, and treatments used for diabetes were recorded. The data of 1797 female (55%) and 1470 male (45%) diabetes patients (total 3267) were analyzed. The prevalence of DR was 28.6%. DR stage was mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR) in 345 patients (12.9%), moderate NPDR in 300 (11.2%), severe NPDR in 108 (4%), and proliferative DR (PDR) in 12 patients (0.4%). Diabetic macular edema (DME) was detected 98 patients (3.7%). Fundus pictures were inadequate for assessment in 18% of cases (588 patient). Advanced age, longer diabetes duration, higher HbA1c level, and being treated for diabetes were found as risk factors for DR. In this study, we used a non-mydriatic fundus camera to determine the prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in a Turkish population. In developing countries, the non-mydriatic fundus camera may be an appropriate way to detect DR in the early stages before it progresses to the proliferative stage.
KeywordsDiabetes Prevalence Turkey Retinopathy Risk factor Screening
We are thankful to the staff of the Pendik Kaynarca Diabetes Center for their efforts.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Diabetes Atlas 4th Edition.; 2010.Google Scholar
- 3.International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Diabetes Atlas 6th Edition.; 2013.Google Scholar
- 5.Viswanath K, McGavin DDM. Diabetic retinopathy: clinical findings and management. Commun Eye Heal. 2003;16(46):21–4.Google Scholar
- 8.Svensson M, Eriksson JW, Dahlquist G. Early glycemic control, age at onset, and development of microvascular complications in childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: a population-based study in northern Sweden. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(4):955–62. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.4.955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Gangnon R, Klein BEK. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy XXII. The twenty-five-year progression of retinopathy in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):1859–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Wong TY, Mwamburi M, Klein R, Larsen M, Flynn H, Hernandez-Medina M, et al. Rates of progression in diabetic retinopathy during different time periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(12):2307–13. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0615. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Bruce BB, Lamirel C, Biousse V, Ward A, Heilpern KL, Newman NJ, et al. Feasibility of nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography in the emergency department: phase I of the FOTO-ED study. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(9):928–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01147.x. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bidot S, Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Nonmydriatic retinal photography in the evaluation of acute neurologic conditions. Neurol Clin Pract. 2013;3(6):527–31. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CPJ.0000437089.75536.fd.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Salti HI, Antonios RS, Haddad SS, Hamam RN, Bashshur ZF, Ghazi NG. Combined nonmydriatic spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and nonmydriatic fundus photography for the detection of age-related macular degeneration changes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015;46(5):531–7. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20150521-04.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(2):204–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01522-2. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Bhargava M, Cheung CYL, Sabanayagam C, et al. Accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening by trained non-physician graders using non-mydriatic fundus camera. Singap Med J. 2012;53(11):715–9.Google Scholar
- 23.TÜİK. Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları. 2016;2017:10–11.Google Scholar
- 33.Thomas RL, Dunstan F, Luzio SD, Roy Chowdury S, Hale SL, North RV, et al. Incidence of diabetic retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending the Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Service for Wales: retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2012;344(February):e874. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e874.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Pugliese G, Solini A, Zoppini G, Fondelli C, Zerbini G, Vedovato M, et al. High prevalence of advanced retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Renal Insufficiency And Cardiovascular Events (RIACE) Italian Multicenter Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98(2):329–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.006. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar