Wound infections and recovery time among patients with diabetic foot ulcer living in multiethnic Suriname, a developing country: a retrospective cohort study among patients from the One Stop Shop for chronic diseases Paramaribo
The purpose of this study was to describe patient characteristics and clinical outcome among patients with diabetic foot ulcers under treatment of a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic in multiethnic Suriname, a developing country in South America. Retrospectively, all diabetes patients (> 18 years) with foot ulcers starting their treatment at the outpatient clinic between November 2013 and October 2014 were included and followed for at least 12 weeks. To assess differences in clinical outcome between subgroups, chi-square and incorporating time-related data, the log-rank test were used. One hundred patients were included (lost to follow-up, n = 20). Half of patients were males (n = 40). Mean age was 57.8 years. Nephropathy, peripheral arterial disease, and neuropathy were present in 90.9, 41.7, and 90.3%, respectively. Thirty-five percent of wounds healed within 12 weeks (median at 50 days, 13 visits). Sixty-eight percent of wounds were infected. No major but four minor amputations were carried out. Looking at subgroups, infection and ethnicity (African vs. Asian descent), but not gender or age, increased risk for delayed healing (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, log-rank test). It seems of high priority to increase awareness and search for accurate preventive strategies for diabetic foot, and related wounds and infections, with special attention for ethnic disparities, in Suriname.
KeywordsDiabetic foot ulcer Infection Recovery Amputation Developing country Ethnic disparity
The authors thank Priscilla van Brussel, Shakieta Joerawan, Devika Soedamah, and Vern Nanhoe, medical students at the Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University Suriname, for their participation at the data collection and management.
LK coordinated this study together with ISK and LMN-vV. LMN-vV conducted statistical analysis, reviewed the data and results, and wrote the manuscript. CP and BA assisted in the data collection and statistical analyses. CP, BA, EB, ISK, and LK collaborated with the interpretation of data, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee, the Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health of Suriname, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Because of the retrospective study design, informed consent was not obtained from the subjects. All data were gathered primarily for standard clinical care. To guaranty confidentiality, analyses were on group level and anonymized by coding.
- 1.Aguiree F, Brown A, Cho NH, Dahlquist G, Dodd S, Dunning T, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas Sixth edition. Basel: International Diabetes Federation; 2013.Google Scholar
- 5.World Bank. Countries and economies. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2014.Google Scholar
- 6.Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek, Censuskantoor. Resultaten Achtste (8e) Volks- En Woningtelling in Suriname (Volume I) Demografische en Sociale Karakteristieken en Migratie, 294/013. Paramaribo: General Bureau of Statistics Suriname; 2013.Google Scholar
- 7.Punwasi W. In: Ministry of Health, Bureau of Public Health, editor. Doodsoorzaken in Suriname 2007-2011. Paramaribo: Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Bureau Openbare gezondheidszorg; 2011.Google Scholar
- 8.Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet. 2003;361(9368):1545–51.Google Scholar
- 15.Lowe J, Sibbald RG, Taha NY, Lebovic G, Rambaran M, Martin C, et al. The Guyana diabetes and foot care project: improved diabetic foot evaluation reduces amputation rates by two-thirds in a lower middle income country. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:920124. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/920124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Faglia E, Favales F, Aldeghi A, Calia P, Quarantiello A, Barbano P, et al. Change in major amputation rate in a center dedicated to diabetic foot care during the 1980s: prognostic determinants for major amputation. J Diab Comp. 1998;12(2):96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1056-8727(97)98004-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJ, Armstrong DG, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):e132–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis346.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ribu L, Birkeland K, Hanestad BR, Moum T, Rustoen TA. Longitudinal study of patients with diabetes and foot ulcers and their health-related quality of life: wound healing and quality-of-life changes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2008;22(6):400–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.06.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Weledji EP, Fokam P. Treatment of the diabetic foot — to amputate or not? BMC Surg. 2014;14:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-83.
- 32.Lazo Mde L, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Pinto ME, Ticse R, Malaga G, Sacksteder K, et al. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy in ambulatory patients with type 2 diabetes in a general hospital in a middle income country: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e95403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar