Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge for hydrochar production: optimization of operating conditions using Box-Behnken design coupled with response surface methodology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrochar was produced from sewage sludge via the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process. The effects of carbonization temperature (150–300 °C), solid load (10–30%), and reaction time (30–120 min) were investigated using response surface methodology (RSM) based on the Box-Behnken factorial design. The optimum operating conditions for hydrochar production were determined by maximizing three key responses: solid yield, higher heating value (HHV), and energy yield. The results showed that the HTC process increased the carbon content from 30.02 wt.% to 37.53 wt.% while decreasing the hydrogen content from 5.26 wt.% to 3.18 wt.% and oxygen content from 25.55 wt.% to 9.48 wt.%, affecting the HHV and energy yield of the hydrochar. As for the optimization, the findings indicate the suitability of a quadratic model, revealing the most favorable conditions to be the temperature of 150 °C, the solid load of 30%, and the reaction time of 30 min, resulting in hydrochar with a solid yield of 71.24%, an HHV of 17.90 MJ/kg, and an energy yield of 94.81%. Of all the process parameters, temperature had the most significant influence on all responses. Further characterization using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) demonstrated enhanced conversion of sewage sludge to hydrochar, evidenced by a notable reduction in peak intensities of solid product compared to the parent material. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis confirmed structural and porosity changes in sewage sludge post-HTC treatment. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated remarkable improvements in the combustion performance of hydrochar, including increased ignition temperature (241.91 °C) and burnout temperature (688 °C). The results of this optimization study offer valuable insights for the scalable implementation of the HTC process in efficiently producing solid fuel from sewage sludge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Xiao Y, Abdul Raheem Lu, Ding W-H, Chen X, Fuchen Wang S-LL (2022) Pretreatment, modification and applications of sewage sludge-derived biochar for resource recovery-A review. Chemosphere 287:131969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo S, Xu D, Guo X et al (2022) Multi-response optimization of sewage sludge-derived hydrochar production and its CO2-assisted gasification performance. J Environ Chem Eng 10:107036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.107036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kossińska N, Krzyżyńska R, Ghazal H, Jouhara H (2023) Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge and resulting biofuels as a sustainable energy source. Energy 275:127337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Syed-Hassan SSA, Wang Y, Hu S, Su S, Xiang J (2017) Thermochemical processing of sewage sludge to energy and fuel: fundamentals, challenges and considerations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80:888–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kakwani NS, Kalbar PP (2020) Review of circular economy in urban water sector : challenges and opportunities in India. J Environ Manage 271:111010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sung B, Farooq A, Valizadeh B et al (2024) Valorization of sewage sludge via air / steam gasification using activated carbon and biochar as catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy 54:284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ali M, Abdullah A, Otero M et al (2019) Heteroatom-doped magnetic hydrochar to remove post-transition and transition metals from water : synthesis, characterization, and adsorption studies. Chemosphere 218:1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma R, Jasrotia K, Singh N, Ghosh P, Srivastava S, Sharma NR, Singh J, Ramesh Kanwar AK (2020) A comprehensive review on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and its applications. Chem Africa 3:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-019-00098-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saufi M, Faradila N, Abdul S et al (2023) Agricultural biomass-based carbon cathode materials for lithium-sulfur batteries : A systematic review. Mater Sci Energy Technol 6:205–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2022.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang R, Wang C, Zhao Z, Jia J, Jin Q (2019) Energy recovery from high-ash municipal sewage sludge by hydrothermal carbonization: Fuel characteristics of biosolid products. Energy 186:115848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan MA, Hameed BH, Siddiqui MR et al (2024) Physicochemical, structural and combustion analyses to estimate the solid fuel efficacy of hydrochar developed by co-hydrothermal carbonization of food and municipal wastes. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 14:7075–7086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02875-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fallah S, Alavi N, Tavakoli O et al (2023) Optimization of hydrothermal carbonization of food waste as sustainable energy conversion approach : Enhancing the properties of hydrochar by landfill leachate substitution as reaction medium and acetic acid catalyst addition. Energy Convers Manag 297:117647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdu E, Saleh M, Husain K (2023) Acid assisted-hydrothermal carbonization of solid waste from essential oils industry : optimization using I -optimal experimental design and removal dye application Faic. Arab J Chem 16(8):104872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ouadrhiri F El, Elyemni M, Lahkimi A, et al (2021) Mesoporous carbon from optimized date stone hydrochar by catalytic hydrothermal carbonization using response surface methodology : application to dyes adsorption. Int J Chem Eng 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555406

  15. Almahbashi NMY, Kutty SRM, Ayoub M, Noor A, Salihi IU, Al-Nini A, Jagaba AH, Aldhawi BNS, Ghaleb AAS (2021) Optimization of preparation conditions of sewage sludge based activated carbon. Ain Shams Eng J 12:1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh RK, Sarkar A, Chakraborty JP (2020) Effect of torrefaction on the physicochemical properties of eucalyptus derived biofuels: estimation of kinetic parameters and optimizing torrefaction using response surface methodology (RSM). Energy 198:117369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hossain A, Ganesan P, Jewaratnam J, Chinna K (2017) Optimization of process parameters for microwave pyrolysis of oil palm fiber (OPF) for hydrogen and biochar production. Energy Convers Manag 133:349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.10.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Islam MA, Paul J, Akter J et al (2021) Conversion of chicken feather waste via hydrothermal carbonization: process optimization and the effect of hydrochar on seed germination of Acacia auriculiformis. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23:1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01209-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sultana A, Novera TM, Islam A, et al (2021) Multi-response optimization for the production of Albizia saman bark hydrochar through hydrothermal carbonization : characterization and pyrolysis kinetic study. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01182-2

  20. Cheng C, Guo Q, Ding L, Raheem A, He Q, Lam SSYG (2022) Upgradation of coconut waste shell to value-added hydrochar via hydrothermal carbonization : parametric optimization using response. Appl Energy 327:120136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Afolabi OOD, Sohail M, Cheng Y (2020) Optimisation and characterisation of hydrochar production from spent coffee grounds by hydrothermal carbonisation. Renew Energy 147:1380–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roslan SZ, Zainudin SF, MohdAris A, Chin KB, Musa M, Mohamad Daud AR, Syed Hassan SSA (2023) Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge into solid biofuel : influences of process conditions on the energetic properties of hydrochar. Energies 16:2483. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao LP, Shi ZJ, Xu F, Sun RC (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 118:619–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Genel S, Durak H, Demirer E, Günes H (2023) Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass with molybdenum, aluminum, cobalt metal powder catalysts and evaluation of wastewater by fungus cultivation. Renew Energy 203:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Arachchige T, Kasun O, Takahashi T, Fujino T (2023) Response surface optimization of chemical coagulation for solid – liquid separation of dairy manure slurry through Box – Behnken design with desirability function. Heliyon 9:e17632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rasam S, Talebkeikhah F, Talebkeikhah M, Salimi A (2019) Physico-chemical properties prediction of hydrochar in macroalgae Sargassum horneri hydrothermal carbonisation. Int J Environ Anal Chem 101(14):2297–2318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2019.1700973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zulkornain MF, Shamsuddin H, Normanbhay S et al (2022) Optimization of rice husk hydrochar via microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization: Fuel properties and combustion kinetics. Bioresour Technol Reports 17:100888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. He C, Giannis A, Wang JY (2013) Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using hydrothermal carbonization: Hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion behavior. Appl Energy 111:257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Murillo HA, Pagés-Díaz J, Díaz-Robles LA et al (2022) Valorization of oat husk by hydrothermal carbonization: Optimization of process parameters and anaerobic digestion of spent liquors. Bioresour Technol 343:960–8524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdoli MA, Ghasemzadeh R (2024) Evaluation and optimization of hydrothermal carbonization condition for hydrochar and methane yield from anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste ( OFMSW ). Fuel 355:129531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Silva RDVK, Lei Z, Shimizu K, Zhang Z (2020) Hydrothermal treatment of sewage sludge to produce solid biofuel: Focus on fuel characteristics. Bioresour Technol Reports 11:100453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh RK, Chakraborty JP, Sarkar A (2020) Optimizing the torrefaction of pigeon pea stalk (cajanus cajan) using response surface methodology (RSM) and characterization of solid, liquid and gaseous products. Renew Energy 155:677–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh S, Chakraborty JP, Mondal MK (2019) Optimization of process parameters for torrefaction of Acacia nilotica using response surface methodology and characteristics of torrefied biomass as upgraded fuel. Energy 186:115865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Favas G, Jackson WR (2003) Hydrothermal dewatering of lower rank coals. 1. Effects of process conditions on the properties of dried product. Fuel 82(1):53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00192-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Funke A, Ziegler F (2010) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: A summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining 4(2):160–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Akbari H, Akbari H, Fanaei F, Adibzadeh A (2022) Optimization of parameters affecting the hydrothermal carbonization of wastewater treatment plant sewage sludge. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03427-8

  37. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) Comparative evaluation of torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of solid biofuel. Energy Convers Manag 105:746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Theppitak S, Hungwe D, Ding L et al (2020) Comparison on solid biofuel production from wet and dry carbonization processes of food wastes. Appl Energy 272:115264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hansen LJ, Fendt S, Spliethoff H (2022) Impact of hydrothermal carbonization on combustion properties of residual biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 12(7):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00777-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aragón-Briceño CI, Grasham O, Ross AB, Dupont V, Camargo-Valero MA (2020) Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage digestate at wastewater treatment works: Influence of solid loading on characteristics of hydrochar, process water and plant energetics. Renew Energy 157:959–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhuang X, Zhan H, Huang Y, Song Y, Yin X, Wu C (2018) Conversion of industrial biowastes to clean solid fuels via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC): Upgrading mechanism in relation to coalification process and combustion behavior. Bioresour Technol 267:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Román S, Nabais JMV, Laginhas C et al (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization as an effective way of densifying the energy content of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 103:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vera L, De ZMM, Cámara MS, Goicoechea C (2014) Experimental design and multiple response optimization. Using the desirability function in analytical methods development. Talanta 124:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2014.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Malhotra M, Garg A (2023) Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge : optimization of operating conditions using design of experiment approach and evaluation of resource recovery potential. J Environ Chem Eng 11:109507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Periyavaram SR, Bella K, Uppala L, Reddy PHP (2023) Hydrothermal carbonization of food waste : Process parameters optimization and biomethane potential evaluation of process water. J Environ Manage 347:119132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kang K, Nanda S, Sun G, Qiu L, Gu Y, Zhang T, Zhu M, Sun R (2019) Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of corn stalk for solid biofuel production: optimization of process parameters and characterization of hydrochar. Energy 186:115795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Alashmawy MM, Hassan HS, Ookawara SA, Elwardany AE (2023) Thermal decomposition characteristics and study of the reaction kinetics of tea-waste. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04017-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Huzir NM, Aziz MMA, Ismail SB, Mahmood NAN, Umor NA, Muhammad SAFA (2019) Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for the palm oil mill effluent treatment by using rice husk ash. Ind Crop Prod 139:111482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mosqueda A, Medrano K, Gonzales H et al (2021) Hydrothermal treatment of banana leaves for solid fuel combustion. Biofuels 12:1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2019.1594590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ferreira MFP, Oliveira BFH, Pinheiro WBS et al (2020) Generation of biofuels by slow pyrolysis of palm empty fruit bunches: Optimization of process variables and characterization of physical-chemical products. Biomass Bioenerg 140:105707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhao J, Liu C, Hou T, Lei Z, Yuan T, Shimizu K, Zhang Z (2022) Conversion of biomass waste to solid fuel via hydrothermal co-carbonization of distillers grains and sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 345:126545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sisuthog W, Attanatho L, Chaiya C (2022) Conversion of empty fruit bunches (EFBs) by hydrothermal carbonization towards hydrochar production. Energy Rep 8:242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang YJ, Yu Y, Huang HJ, Yu CL, Fang HS, Zhou CH, Yin X, Chen WH, Guo X (2022) Efficient conversion of sewage sludge into hydrochar by microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization. Sci Total Environ 803:149874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang F, Guo C, Liu X, Sun H, Zhang C, Sun Y, Zhu H (2022) Revealing carbon-iron interaction characteristics in sludge-derived hydrochars under different hydrothermal conditions. Chemosphere 300:134572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lang Q, Liu Z, Li Y, Xu J, Li J, Liu B, Sun Q (2022) Combustion characteristics, kinetic and thermodynamic analyses of hydrochars derived from hydrothermal carbonization of cattle manure. J Environ Chem Eng 10(1):106938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106938

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) for their invaluable support in providing technical assistance and access to laboratory facilities throughout the study. Finally, the authors wish to express their profound gratitude to the late Ahmad Rafizan Mohamad Daud for his invaluable contribution to this research.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

    Siti Zaharah Roslan, Muzakkir Mohammad Zainol & Syed Shatir A. Syed-Hassan

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    Kagiso Bikane

Authors
  1. Siti Zaharah Roslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muzakkir Mohammad Zainol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kagiso Bikane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Syed Shatir A. Syed-Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Siti Zaharah Roslan: formal analysis; investigation; writing original-draft preparation. Muzakkir Mohammad Zainol: conceptualization, supervision, writing-reviewing and editing. Kagiso Bikane: methodology, validation. Syed Shatir A. Syed Hassan: methodology, validation, supervision, project administration, writing-reviewing and editing; funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Shatir A. Syed-Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not Applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roslan, S.Z., Zainol, M.M., Bikane, K. et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge for hydrochar production: optimization of operating conditions using Box-Behnken design coupled with response surface methodology. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05729-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05729-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation