Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A research on biogas production from a mixture of olive pomace and cattle manure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy has a strategic importance for all countries. To keep limited energy resources in proper use for a long time, the use of new energy and renewable energy resources should be expanded.

Significant amounts of organic residues are produced every year in agricultural areas and agro-industrial activities. Evaluating biomass resources and bringing them into the economy, they can be converted into useful energy in the area or region where they are formed.

Turkey is one of the most important olive oil producers in the world, located in the Mediterranean Region. Olive pulp or pomace, as it is commonly known, produced in olive oil production is generally evaluated by burning.

In this study, biogas production amounts were determined by adding olive pomace in different proportions to cattle manure. The experiments were carried out in laboratory-type biogas reactors. The retention time was chosen as 15 days, the fermentation temperature was 37 °C, and the dry matter content was 7%. The experiments were carried out in 4 reactors as only cattle manure, 10% olive pomace + 90% cattle manure mixture, 25% olive pomace + 75% cattle manure mixture, and 40% olive pomace + 60% cattle manure mixture.

According to the experiment results, the highest daily methane production was obtained in the mixture with 40% olive pomace added. In methane production per organic dry matter, the mixture to which 25% olive pomace was added produced the highest methane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. IEA (2022) World Energy Outlook 2022. International Energy Agency. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/830fe099-5530-48f2-a7c1-11f35d510983/WorldEnergyOutlook2022.pdf.  Accessed Mar 2023

  2. FAOSTAT (2021) Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations Database. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.  Accessed Jan 2023

  3. Khdair A, Abu-Rumman G (2020) Sustainable environmental management and valorization options for olive mill byproducts in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Processes 8:671. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8060671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreno-Maroto JM, Uceda-Rodríguez M, Cobo-Ceacero CJ, De Hoces MC, MartínLara MÁ, Cotes-Palomino T, LópezGarcía AB, Martínez-García C (2019) Recycling of ‘alperujo’ (olive pomace) as a key component in the sintering of lightweight aggregates. J Clean Prod 239:118041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ribeiro TB, Oliveira AL, Costa C, Nunes J, António A, Vicente AA, Pintado M (2020) Total and sustainable valorisation of olive pomace using a fractionation approach. Appl Sci 10:6785. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karantonis HC, Tsantila N, Stamatakis G, Samiotaki M, Panayotou G, Antonopoulou S, Demopoulos CA (2008) Bioactive polar lipids in olive oil, pomace and waste byproducts. J Food Biochem 32:443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2008.00160.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vlyssides AG, Loizides M, Karlis PK (2004) Integrated strategic approach for reusing olive oil extraction by-products. J Clean Prod 12:603–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00078-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roig A, Cayuela ML, Sanchez-Monedero MA (2006) An overview on olive mill wastes and their valorisation methods. Waste Manage 26:960–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christoforou E, Fokaides PA (2016) A review of olive mill solid wastes to energy utilization techniques. Waste Manage 49:346–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ducom G, Gautier M, Pietraccini M, Tagutchou J-P, Lebouil D, Gourdon R (2020) Comparative analyses ofthree olive mill solid residues from di_erent countries and processes for energy recovery by gasification. Renew Energy 145:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekin AR, Dalgıç AC (2000) Biogas production from olive pomace. Resour Conserv Recycl 30(4):301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00067-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rashed MB (2014) The effect of temperature on the biogas production from olive pomace. Univ Bull 3(16):135–148

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ulukardesler A, Ulusoy Y, Tumsavas Z (2016) Biogas production from olive waste and olive pomace in Marmara region. Fuels and Combustion in Engineering Journal 3:21–24. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/303204

  14. Valenti F, Zhong Y, Sun M, Porto SMC, Toscano A, Dale BE, Sibilla F, Liao W (2018) Anaerobic co-digestion of multiple agricultural residues to enhance biogas production in southern Italy. Waste Manage 78:151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Riggio V, Comino E, Rosso M (2015) Energy production from anaerobic co-digestion processing of cow slurry, olive pomace and apple pulp. Renew Energy 83:1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elalami D, Carrere H, Abdelouahdi K, Garcia-Bernet D, Peydecastaing J, Vaca-Medina G, Barakat A (2020) Mild microwaves, ultrasonic and alkaline pretreatments for improving methane production: impact on biochemical and structural properties of olive pomace. Biores Technol 299:12259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. APHA (2023) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. In: Lipps WC, Braun-Howland EB, Baxter TE, eds. American public health association, american water works association, water environment federation, 24th edn. APHA Press, Washington DC

  18. Tufaner F (2020) Zeytin Posası (Pirina) Atıklarından Biyogaz Üretimi, V. Uluslararası Battalgazi Bilimsel Çalışmalar Kongresi, Kongre Kitabı, 18–20 Aralık 2020 Malatya, pp 511–519. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fatih-Tufaner/publication/347998946_Biogas_Production_From_Olive_Pomace_Prina_Wastes_Zeytin_Posasi_Pirina_Atiklarindan_Biyogaz_Uretimi/links/625e7301a279ec5dd701dd9e/Biogas-Production-From-Olive-Pomace-Prina-Wastes-Zeytin-Posasi-Pirina-Atiklarindan-Biyogaz-Ueretimi.pdf

  19. Amirante R, Demastro G, Distaso E, Hassaan MA, Mormando A, Pantaleo AM, Clodoveo ML (2018) Effects of ultrasound and green synthesis ZnO nanoparticles on biogas production from olive pomace. Energy Procedia 148:940–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Battista F, Ruggeri B, Fino D, Erriquens F, Rutigliano L, Mescia D (2013) Toward the scale-up of agro-food feed mixture for biogas production. J Environ Chem Eng 1:1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Orive M, Cebrián M, Zufía J (2016) Techno-economic anaerobic co-digestion feasibility study for two-phase olive oil mill pomace and pig slurry. Renew Energy 97:532–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was supported by Akdeniz University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit with the number FBA-2019–4748.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salih Sözer.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sözer, S. A research on biogas production from a mixture of olive pomace and cattle manure. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 10651–10659 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04405-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04405-4

Keywords

Navigation