Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Production of high-quality biogenic fuels by co-pelletization of sugarcane bagasse with pinewood sawdust and peanut shell

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Sugar-energy sector is key to the provision of food and energy worldwide. However, it can largely generate mill-run bagasse as an agro-residual biomass. The tradition of the sector is to put it back into the industrial process as an alternative fuel to co-generate steam and power for milling and biorefining factories. However, excessive ash in the mineral phase of this material typically makes it challenging for burning it in boilers cost-effectively, driving the need of developing a more suitable pathway for its disposal. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze whether co-pelleting sugarcane bagasse with either pinewood sawdust or peanut shell could make it possible for transforming this low-technical-quality agro-residual biomass into a solid biofuel of superior quality. The production of pellets consisted of co-pressing sugarcane bagasse with either pinewood sawdust or peanut shell at the standard proportion of 50/50 on an automatic pelletizer at 200 MPa and 125°C. The blending improved the quality of biopellets. These products fulfilled the requirements of European standards for premium-grade solid biofuels. Blends proved to be highly energetic (15.1–15.35 GJ m−3) and durable (98.05–98.7%). They also emitted less of NOx (92.7–101.55 mg m−3), CO (59.05–63.2 mg m−3), and volatile organics (26.3–29.65 mg m−3), making it possible for the boiler to operate a clearer and safer way. Therefore, insights into the conceptual and technical ramifications of this study can provide further knowledge to progress the field’s prominence in transforming sugarcane bagasse into a solid biofuel of greater quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Abbreviations

ADF:

Acid detergent fiber

ADL:

Acid detergent liquid

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

BTS:

Biomass to solid

CCI:

Comprehensive combustion index

CEN:

European Committee for Standardization (French: Comité Européen de Normalisation)

Di:

Ignition index

ETS:

Emissions Trading System

FI:

Fouling index

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

HPS:

Heating and power

HSD:

Honestly significant different

IWPB:

Initiative for Wood Pellet Buyers

NDC:

Nationally Determined Contribution

NDF:

Neutral detergent fiber

PCA:

Principal component analysis

PCI:

Primary principal component

PCII:

Secondary principal component

PFI:

Pellet Fuels Institute

Rw:

Combustion stability index

SD:

Standard deviation

SI:

Slagging index

STP:

Standard temperature and pressure

VOCs:

Volatile organic compounds

WTE:

Waste to energy

References

  1. Wang J, Yellezuome D, Zhang Z et al (2022) Understanding pyrolysis mechanisms of pinewood sawdust and sugarcane bagasse from kinetics and thermodynamics. Ind Crops Prod 177:114378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao M, Long C, Sun S et al (2021) Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of peanut shell for the production aromatic rich monomer compounds. J Energy Inst 96:90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2021.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anukam A, Berghel J, Henrikson G et al (2021) A review of the mechanism of bonding in densified biomass pellets. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 148:111249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilvari H, de Jong W, Schott DL (2019) Quality parameters relevant for densification of bio-materials: Measuring methods and affecting factors - A review. Biomass Bioenerg 120:117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferraro A, Colangelo F, Farina I et al (2021) Cold-bonding process for treatment and reuse of waste materials: Technical designs and applications of pelletized products. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 51:2197–2231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1776052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bajwa DS, Peterson T, Sharma N et al (2018) A review of densified solid biomass for energy production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 96:296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui X, Yang J, Wang Z, Shi X (2021) Better use of bioenergy: A critical review of co-pelletizing for biofuel manufacturing. Carbon Capture Sci Technol 1:100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2021.100005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nunes J, Freitas H (2016) An indicator to assess the pellet production per forest area. A case-study from Portugal. Forest Policy Econ 70:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Whittaker C, Shield I (2017) Factors affecting wood, energy grass and straw pellet durability – A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Maraver A, Popov V, Zamorano M (2011) A review of European standards for pellet quality. Renew Energy 36:3537–3540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenbies MH, Volk TA, Amidon TE, Shi S (2019) Influence of blending and hot water extraction on the quality of wood pellets. Fuel 241:1058–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anukam AI, Berghel J, Frodeson S et al (2019) Characterization of Pure and Blended Pellets Made from Norway Spruce and Pea Starch: A Comparative Study of Bonding Mechanism Relevant to Quality. Energies 12:4415. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harun NY, Afzal MT (2016) Effect of Particle Size on Mechanical Properties of Pellets Made from Biomass Blends. Procedia Eng 148:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng JH, Bi HT, Lim CJ, Sokhansanj S (2013) Study on Density, Hardness, and Moisture Uptake of Torrefied Wood Pellets. Energy Fuels 27:967–974. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301928q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cardozo E, Malmquist A (2019) Performance comparison between the use of wood and sugarcane bagasse pellets in a Stirling engine micro-CHP system. Appl Therm Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Toscano Miranda N, Lopes Motta I, Maciel Filho R, Wolf Maciel MR (2021) Sugarcane bagasse pyrolysis: A review of operating conditions and products properties. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 149:111394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Negrão DR, Grandis A, Buckeridge MS et al (2021) Inorganics in sugarcane bagasse and straw and their impacts for bioenergy and biorefining: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 148:111268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Dias MOS, Maciel Filho R, Mantelatto PE et al (2015) Sugarcane processing for ethanol and sugar in Brazil. Environ Dev 15:35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammadi F, Roedl A, Abdoli MA et al (2020) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of the energetic use of bagasse in Iranian sugar industry. Renew Energy 145:1870–1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meghana M, Shastri Y (2020) Sustainable valorization of sugar industry waste: Status, opportunities, and challenges. Biores Technol 303:122929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hofsetz K, Silva MA (2012) Brazilian sugarcane bagasse: Energy and non-energy consumption. Biomass Bioenerg 46:564–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.06.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pradhan P, Mahajani SM, Arora A (2018) Production and utilization of fuel pellets from biomass: A review. Fuel Process Technol 181:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Niu Y, Tan H, Hui S (2016) Ash-related issues during biomass combustion: Alkali-induced slagging, silicate melt-induced slagging (ash fusion), agglomeration, corrosion, ash utilization, and related countermeasures. Prog Energy Combust Sci 52:1–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2015.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Junqueira TL, Chagas MF, Gouveia VLR et al (2017) Techno-economic analysis and climate change impacts of sugarcane biorefineries considering different time horizons. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0722-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal NK, Kumar M, Ghosh P et al (2022) Anaerobic digestion of sugarcane bagasse for biogas production and digestate valorization. Chemosphere 295:133893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Vassileva CG (2014) An overview of the behaviour of biomass during combustion: Part II. Ash fusion and ash formation mechanisms of biomass types. Fuel 117:152–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. David GF, Justo OR, Perez VH, Garcia-Perez M (2018) Thermochemical conversion of sugarcane bagasse by fast pyrolysis: High yield of levoglucosan production. J Anal Appl Pyrol 133:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kolawole JT, Babafemi AJ, Fanijo E et al (2021) State-of-the-art review on the use of sugarcane bagasse ash in cementitious materials. Cement Concr Compos 118:103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas BS, Yang J, Mo KH et al (2021) Biomass ashes from agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials or aggregate replacement in cement/geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review. J Build Eng 40:102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Charitha V, Athira VS, Jittin V et al (2021) Use of different agro-waste ashes in concrete for effective upcycling of locally available resources. Constr Build Mater 285:122851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jamora JB, Gudia SEL, Go AW et al (2019) Potential reduction of greenhouse gas emission through the use of sugarcane ash in cement-based industries: A case in the Philippines. J Clean Prod 239:118072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Aruna BN, Sharma AK, Kumar S (2021) A review on modified sugarcane bagasse biosorbent for removal of dyes. Chemosphere 268:129309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaushik A, Basu S, Singh K et al (2017) Activated carbon from sugarcane bagasse ash for melanoidins recovery. J Environ Manage 200:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rovani S, Santos JJ, Corio P, Fungaro DA (2018) Highly Pure Silica Nanoparticles with High Adsorption Capacity Obtained from Sugarcane Waste Ash. ACS Omega 3:2618–2627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Abdul Mutalib AA, Ibrahim ML, Matmin J et al (2020) SiO2-Rich Sugar Cane Bagasse Ash Catalyst for Transesterification of Palm Oil. Bioenerg Res 13:986–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10119-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Trache D, Hazwan Hussin M, Mohamad Haafiz MK, Kumar Thakur V (2017) Recent progress in cellulose nanocrystals: sources and production. Nanoscale 9:1763–1786. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR09494E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Santucci BS, Bras J, Belgacem MN et al (2016) Evaluation of the effects of chemical composition and refining treatments on the properties of nanofibrillated cellulose films from sugarcane bagasse. Ind Crops Prod 91:238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosales-Calderon O, Arantes V (2019) A review on commercial-scale high-value products that can be produced alongside cellulosic ethanol. Biotechnol Biofuels 12:240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1529-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mustafa G, Arshad M, Bano I, Abbas M (2020) Biotechnological applications of sugarcane bagasse and sugar beet molasses. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01141-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Carvalho L, Wopienka E, Pointner C et al (2013) Performance of a pellet boiler fired with agricultural fuels. Appl Energy 104:286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Demirbas MF, Balat M, Balat H (2009) Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development. Energy Convers Manage 50:1746–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Anukam A, Mamphweli S, Reddy P et al (2016) Pre-processing of sugarcane bagasse for gasification in a downdraft biomass gasifier system: A comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 66:775–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Antoniou N, Monlau F, Sambusiti C et al (2019) Contribution to Circular Economy options of mixed agricultural wastes management: Coupling anaerobic digestion with gasification for enhanced energy and material recovery. J Clean Prod 209:505–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cardozo E, Erlich C, Alejo L, Fransson TH (2014) Combustion of agricultural residues: An experimental study for small-scale applications. Fuel 115:778–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Erlich C, Fransson TH (2011) Downdraft gasification of pellets made of wood, palm-oil residues respective bagasse: Experimental study. Appl Energy 88:899–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cardozo E, Erlich C, Alejo L, Fransson TH (2016) Comparison of the thermal power availability of different agricultural residues using a residential boiler. Biomass Conv Bioref 6:435–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-016-0200-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Svedberg URA, Högberg H-E, Högberg J, Galle B (2004) Emission of Hexanal and Carbon Monoxide from Storage of Wood Pellets, a Potential Occupational and Domestic Health Hazard. Ann Occup Hyg 48:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meh015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. de Palma KR, García-Hernando N, Silva MA et al (2019) Pyrolysis and Combustion Kinetic Study and Complementary Study of Ash Fusibility Behavior of Sugarcane Bagasse, Sugarcane Straw, and Their Pellets—Case Study of Agro-Industrial Residues. Energy Fuels 33:3227–3238. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b04288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Smith AM, Singh S, Ross AB (2016) Fate of inorganic material during hydrothermal carbonisation of biomass: Influence of feedstock on combustion behaviour of hydrochar. Fuel 169:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Arashnia I, Najafi G, Ghobadian B et al (2015) Development of Micro-scale Biomass-fuelled CHP System Using Stirling Engine. Energy Procedia 75:1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. García R, Gil MV, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2019) Pelletization of wood and alternative residual biomass blends for producing industrial quality pellets. Fuel 251:739–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zeng T, Weller N, Pollex A, Lenz V (2016) Blended biomass pellets as fuel for small scale combustion appliances: Influence on gaseous and total particulate matter emissions and applicability of fuel indices. Fuel 184:689–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ríos-Badrán IM, Luzardo-Ocampo I, García-Trejo JF et al (2020) Production and characterization of fuel pellets from rice husk and wheat straw. Renew Energy 145:500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Stasiak M, Molenda M, Bańda M et al (2017) Mechanical and combustion properties of sawdust—Straw pellets blended in different proportions. Fuel Process Technol 156:366–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mack R, Kuptz D, Schön C, Hartmann H (2019) Combustion behavior and slagging tendencies of kaolin additivated agricultural pellets and of wood-straw pellet blends in a small-scale boiler. Biomass Bioenerg 125:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zawiślak K, Sobczak P, Kraszkiewicz A et al (2020) The use of lignocellulosic waste in the production of pellets for energy purposes. Renew Energy 145:997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Serrano C, Monedero E, Lapuerta M, Portero H (2011) Effect of moisture content, particle size and pine addition on quality parameters of barley straw pellets. Fuel Process Technol 92:699–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dao CN, Salam A, Kim Oanh NT, Tabil LG (2022) Effects of length-to-diameter ratio, pinewood sawdust, and sodium lignosulfonate on quality of rice straw pellets produced via a flat die pellet mill. Renew Energy 181:1140–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. de Souza HJPL, Arantes MDC, Vidaurre GB et al (2020) Pelletization of eucalyptus wood and coffee growing wastes: Strategies for biomass valorization and sustainable bioenergy production. Renew Energy 149:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Dong Y, Ji H, Dong C et al (2020) Preparation of high-grade dissolving pulp from radiata pine. Ind Crops Prod 143:111880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Gebregziabher B, Kassahun SK, Kiflie Z (2021) Statistical optimization of mixed peanut shell and Khat (Catha edulis) stem carbonization process for molasses enhanced cold and low-pressure pelletization. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01446-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Abady S, Shimelis H, Janila P (2019) Farmers’ perceived constraints to groundnut production, their variety choice and preferred traits in eastern Ethiopia: implications for drought-tolerance breeding. J Crop Improv 33:505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2019.1625836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Dou X et al (2012) Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Biores Technol 118:536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhao X, Chen J, Du F (2012) Potential use of peanut by-products in food processing: a review. J Food Sci Technol 49:521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0449-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bi H, Wang C, Jiang X et al (2021) Thermodynamics, kinetics, gas emissions and artificial neural network modeling of co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and peanut shell. Fuel 284:118988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yang F, Zhang Q, Jian H et al (2020) Effect of biochar-derived dissolved organic matter on adsorption of sulfamethoxazole and chloramphenicol. J Hazard Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ahmad MA, Mohamad Yusop MF, Zakaria R et al (2021) Adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution by peanut shell based activated carbon. Mater Today: Proc 47:1246–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Xiao Z (2018) Porous Biomass Carbon Derived from Peanut Shells as Electrode Materials with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance for Supercapacitors. Int J Electrochem Sci. https://doi.org/10.20964/2018.06.54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wu M-F, Hsiao C-H, Lee C-Y, Tai N-H (2020) Flexible Supercapacitors Prepared Using the Peanut-Shell-Based Carbon. ACS Omega 5:14417–14426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Goering HK, Soest PJV (1970) Forage Fiber Analyses (apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). U.S. Agricultural Research Service

  71. Chew KW, Chia SR, Yap YJ et al (2018) Densification of food waste compost: Effects of moisture content and dairy powder waste additives on pellet quality. Process Saf Environ Prot 116:780–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Azargohar R, Nanda S, Kang K et al (2019) Effects of bio-additives on the physicochemical properties and mechanical behavior of canola hull fuel pellets. Renew Energy 132:296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Park S, Kim SJ, Oh KC et al (2020) Investigation of agro-byproduct pellet properties and improvement in pellet quality through mixing. Energy 190:116380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Abdulmumini MM, Zigan S, Bradley MSA, Lestander TA (2020) Fuel pellet breakage in pneumatic transport and durability tests. Renew Energy 157:911–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang T, Zhai Y, Li H et al (2018) Co-hydrothermal carbonization of food waste-woody biomass blend towards biofuel pellets production. Biores Technol 267:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Xie C, Liu J, Xie W et al (2018) Quantifying thermal decomposition regimes of textile dyeing sludge, pomelo peel, and their blends. Renew Energy 122:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sigvardsen NM, Ottosen LM (2019) Characterization of coal bio ash from wood pellets and low-alkali coal fly ash and use as partial cement replacement in mortar. Cement Concr Compos 95:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Bala-Litwiniak A, Radomiak H (2019) Possibility of the Utilization of Waste Glycerol as an Addition to Wood Pellets. Waste Biomass Valor 10:2193–2199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0260-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Yang H-H, Gupta SK, Dhital NB et al (2020) Comparative investigation of coal- and oil-fired boilers based on emission factors, ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation potentials of VOCs. J Environ Sci 92:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Migenda N, Möller R, Schenck W (2021) Adaptive dimensionality reduction for neural network-based online principal component analysis. PLoS ONE 16:e0248896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Monedero E, Portero H, Lapuerta M (2015) Pellet blends of poplar and pine sawdust: Effects of material composition, additive, moisture content and compression die on pellet quality. Fuel Process Technol 132:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zafari A, Kianmehr MH (2014) Factors affecting mechanical properties of biomass pellet from compost. Environ Technol 35:478–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.833639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Alemi H, Kianmehr MH, Borghaee AM (2010) Effect of pellet processing of fertilizer on slow-release nitrogen in soil. Asian J Plant Sci 9:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Pampuro N, Bagagiolo G, Priarone PC, Cavallo E (2017) Effects of pelletizing pressure and the addition of woody bulking agents on the physical and mechanical properties of pellets made from composted pig solid fraction. Powder Technol 311:112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.01.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Frodeson S, Henriksson G, Berghel J (2018) Pelletizing Pure Biomass Substances to Investigate the Mechanical Properties and Bonding Mechanisms. BioResources 13:1202–1222

    Google Scholar 

  86. Berghel J, Frodeson S, Granström K et al (2013) The effects of kraft lignin additives on wood fuel pellet quality, energy use and shelf life. Fuel Process Technol 112:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Persson T, Riedel J, Berghel J et al (2013) Emissions and deposit properties from combustion of wood pellet with magnesium additives. J Fuel Chem Technol 41:530–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(13)60029-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhang Y, Huang G, Yu S et al (2021) Physicochemical characterization and pyrolysis kinetic analysis of Moutai-flavored dried distiller’s grains towards its thermochemical conversion for potential applications. J Anal Appl Pyrol 155:105046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Joshi Y, Di Marcello M, de Jong W (2015) Torrefaction: Mechanistic study of constituent transformations in herbaceous biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrol 115:353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Karatzos S, van Dyk JS, McMillan JD, Saddler J (2017) Drop-in biofuel production via conventional (lipid/fatty acid) and advanced (biomass) routes. Part I. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 11:344–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Nordin A (1994) Chemical elemental characteristics of biomass fuels. Biomass Bioenerg 6:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(94)E0031-M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Liu Z, Quek A, Balasubramanian R (2014) Preparation and characterization of fuel pellets from woody biomass, agro-residues and their corresponding hydrochars. Appl Energy 113:1315–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. O’Donovan A, Gupta VK, Coyne JM, Tuohy MG (2013) Acid Pre-treatment Technologies and SEM Analysis of Treated Grass Biomass in Biofuel Processing. In: Gupta VK, Tuohy MG (eds) Biofuel Technologies: Recent Developments. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  94. Anukam A, Mamphweli S, Meyer E, Okoh O (2014) Computer Simulation of the Mass and Energy Balance during Gasification of Sugarcane Bagasse. J Energy 2014:e713054. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/713054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Obernberger I, Thek G (2004) Physical characterisation and chemical composition of densified biomass fuels with regard to their combustion behaviour. Biomass Bioenerg 27:653–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Woodcock CR, Mason JS (1988) Bulk Solids Handling: An Introduction to the Practice and Technology. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  97. Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S (2004) Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg 27:339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Mišljenović N, Čolović R, Vukmirović Đ et al (2016) The effects of sugar beet molasses on wheat straw pelleting and pellet quality. A comparative study of pelleting by using a single pellet press and a pilot-scale pellet press. Fuel Process Technol 144:220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Arshadi M, Tengel T, Nilsson C (2018) Antioxidants as additives in wood pellets as a mean to reduce off-gassing and risk for self-heating during storage. Fuel Process Technol 179:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Borén E, Pommer L, Nordin A, Larsson SH (2020) Off-gassing from pilot-scale torrefied pine chips: Impact of torrefaction severity, cooling technology, and storage times. Fuel Process Technol 202:106380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Tursi A (2019) A review on biomass: importance, chemistry, classification, and conversion. Biofuel Res J 6:962–979. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2019.6.2.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Sarker TR, Pattnaik F, Nanda S et al (2021) Hydrothermal pretreatment technologies for lignocellulosic biomass: A review of steam explosion and subcritical water hydrolysis. Chemosphere 284:131372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Welker CM, Balasubramanian VK, Petti C et al (2015) Engineering Plant Biomass Lignin Content and Composition for Biofuels and Bioproducts. Energies 8:7654–7676. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8087654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Abejón R, Pérez-Acebo H, Clavijo L (2018) Alternatives for Chemical and Biochemical Lignin Valorization: Hot Topics from a Bibliometric Analysis of the Research Published During the 2000–2016 Period. Processes 6:98. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6080098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. van Dam JEG, van den Oever MJA, Teunissen W et al (2004) Process for production of high density/high performance binderless boards from whole coconut husk: Part 1: Lignin as intrinsic thermosetting binder resin. Ind Crops Prod 19:207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Anoop KB, Sundararajan T, Das SK (2009) Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:2189–2195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.11.063

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  107. Ma X, Zheng H, Addy M et al (2016) Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris in wastewater with waste glycerol: Strategies for improving nutrients removal and enhancing lipid production. Biores Technol 207:252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Sommersacher P, Brunner T, Obernberger I (2012) Fuel Indexes: A Novel Method for the Evaluation of Relevant Combustion Properties of New Biomass Fuels. Energy Fuels 26:380–390. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef201282y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Nussbaumer T (1997) Primary and secondary measures for the reduction of nitric oxide emissions from biomass combustion. In: Bridgwater AV, Boocock DGB (eds) Developments in thermochemical biomass conversion, vol 1/2. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 1447–1461

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  110. Lv D, Xu M, Liu X et al (2010) Effect of cellulose, lignin, alkali and alkaline earth metallic species on biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Fuel Process Technol 91:903–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Carpenter D, L.Westover T, Czernik S, Jablonski W (2014) Biomass feedstocks for renewable fuel production: a review of the impacts of feedstock and pretreatment on the yield and product distribution of fast pyrolysis bio-oils and vapors. Green Chem 16:384–406. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3GC41631C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Silva DAL, Filleti RAP, Musule R et al (2022) A systematic review and life cycle assessment of biomass pellets and briquettes production in Latin America. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 157:112042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Rousset P, Caldeira-Pires A, Sablowski A, Rodrigues T (2011) LCA of eucalyptus wood charcoal briquettes. J Clean Prod 19:1647–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Araújo YRV, de Góis ML, Junior LMC, Carvalho M (2018) Carbon footprint associated with four disposal scenarios for urban pruning waste. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:1863–1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0613-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Pereira MF, Nicolau VP, Bazzo E (2018) Exergoenvironmental analysis concerning the wood chips and wood pellets production chains. Biomass Bioenerg 119:253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Sherwood J (2020) The significance of biomass in a circular economy. Biores Technol 300:122755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122755

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Coordination of for the Improvement for Higher Education Personnel for scholarship (CAPES, financing code N° 001).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira, Marcelo Rodrigues Barbosa Júnior, and Armando Lopes de Brito Filho contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil

    Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira, Marcelo Rodrigues Barbosa Júnior, Armando Lopes de Brito Filho & Rouverson Pereira da Silva

Authors
  1. Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcelo Rodrigues Barbosa Júnior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Armando Lopes de Brito Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rouverson Pereira da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflict of interest.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Bruno R. A. Moreira took part in conceptualization, data curation, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, and writing—review & editing; Armando L. B. Filho involved in investigation and methodology, Marcelo R. B. Júnior participated in investigation and methodology; Rouverson P. Silva took part in supervision and writing—review & editing.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 287 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Almeida Moreira, B., Barbosa Júnior, M., de Brito Filho, A. et al. Production of high-quality biogenic fuels by co-pelletization of sugarcane bagasse with pinewood sawdust and peanut shell. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02818-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02818-1

Keywords

search

Navigation