Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Water-energy-land-food nexus for bioethanol development in Nigeria

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing global population leading to increased consumption of finite resources is a major challenge facing the ecosystem. This constraint creates the need for a well-coordinated system for producing a sustainable source of food, water, and clean energy (biofuels) which can be achieved by employing nexus principles. As the Nigerian government has been promoting sugar and bioethanol production from sugarcane in a bid to achieve food and energy security, this study aims to evaluate the water-energy-land-food nexus for the development of bioethanol in Nigeria. To assist this evaluation, indicators—constituting the nexus index—were applied to measure the consumption, mass, and economic productivity of resources. Land productivity was added to the nexus assessment as part of this research. Producing biofuels from crops impacts nexus resources, importantly land and food but also water and fossil energy resources used in the cultivation and processing phase. The nexus assessment helped to show areas of resource use inefficiencies needing possible improvements to move production towards sustainable use of resources. Two sites were studied and both had an average nexus performance; however, the site having modern irrigation used lesser energy leading to a better performance in the water consumption, energy, mass, and economic productivity indicators. This research provides literature as well as quantitative values that can help stakeholders analyse and make judicious decisions (policy) using the nexus system to improve resource management.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEA (2014) CCC. Author’s analysis. London, UK: IEA Clean coal centre; 2014

  2. US EPA (2018) Global greenhouse gas emissions data | US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data

  3. Hoff J (2011) Understanding the nexus. In: Background paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: the water, energy and food security nexus, Bonn, Germany, 16–18 November 2011, Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI): Stockholm, Sweden

  4. IEA (2021) World energy balances: overview, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-balances-overview

  5. Water and agriculture - OECD (2016) Oecd.org. https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/water-and-agriculture/

  6. DEFRA (2012) Food statistics pocketbook. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and David Heath CBE, London

  7. FAO (2014) FAO, IFAD & WFP, The state of food insecurity in the world, 2014. Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. (ed. FAO, 2014)

  8. Gheewala SH, Damen B, Shi X (2013) Biofuels: economic, environmental and social benefits and costs for developing countries in Asia. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 4(6):497–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gheewala SH, Kittner N, Shi X (2017) Costs and benefits of biofuels in Asia. In: Routledge handbook of energy in Asia (pp. 363–376). Routledge

  10. Liu H, Huang Y, Yuan H, Yin X, Wu C (2018) Life cycle assessment of biofuels in China: status and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 97:301–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.052

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Vourdoubas J (2016) Energy and agri-food systems: production and consumption. Mediterra 2016. Zero waste in the Mediterranean. Natural resources, Food and Knowledge/International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)–Paris: Presses de sciences Po, 2016., 155

  12. USDOE (2014) The water-energy nexus: challenges and opportunities. U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EPSA-0002

  13. Rulli MC, Bellomi D, Cazzoli A, De Carolis G, D’Odorico P (2016) The water-land-food nexus of first-generation biofuels. Sci Reports 6:1. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldemberg J (2008) The Brazilian biofuels industry. Biotechnol Biofuels 1(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-1-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Adedokun A (2018) The effects of oil shocks on government expenditures and government revenues nexus in Nigeria (with exogeneity restrictions). Futur Bus J 4(2):219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2018.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. NNPC (2016) Monthly petroleum information. NNPC, Abuja

    Google Scholar 

  17. NNPC (2007) Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, draft Nigerian bio-fuel policy and incentives. Abuja, Nigeria

    Google Scholar 

  18. ECN (2003) National energy policy report of the federal government of Nigeria, Energy Commission of Nigeria, Abuja

  19. AATF (2007) Proceedings of a small group meeting: African agricultural technology foundation, Ibadan, Nigeria

  20. NSMP (2010) National Sugar Development Council (NSDC). Retrieved July 26, 2021, from https://www.nsdcnigeria.org/nsdc-sugar-master-plan/

  21. Ohimain EI (2010) Emerging bio-ethanol projects in Nigeria: their opportunities and challenges. Energy Policy 38(11):7161–7168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.038

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Adewuyi A (2020) Challenges and prospects of renewable energy in Nigeria: a case of bioethanol and biodiesel production. Energy Rep 6:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aliyu AS, Deba AA, Saidu H, Mohammed IL, Usman MM (2017) Biofuel development in Nigeria: prospect and challenges. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci 36(1):1–9

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanders KT (2015) Critical review: uncharted waters? The future of the electricity-water nexus. Environ Sci Technol 49(1):51–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. FAO (2018) Water-energy-food-nexus; (http://www.fao.org/landwater/water/watergovernance/waterfoodenergynexus/en/)

  26. EU (2018) European Commission 2018 Water nexus—policy; (https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sectors/infrastructure/water-andsanitation/water-nexus_en)

  27. European Environment Agency (2018) Renewable energy in Europe—2018: recent growth and knock-on effects. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  28. Albrecht TR, Crootof A, Scott CA (2018) The water-energy-food nexus: a systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environ Res Lett 13(4):043002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meadows D, Randers D, Behrens W (1972) The limits to growth. Universe books, New York (ISBN: 0-87663-165-0)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Grenon M, Lapillonne B (1976) The WELMM approach to energy strategies and options, IIASA report RR-76–19 December

  31. Messner S, Strubegger M (1995) User’s guide for MESSAGE III. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Working paper

  32. Dargin J, Daher B, Mohtar RH (2019) Complexity versus simplicity in water-energy-food nexus (WEF) assessment tools. Sci Total Environ 650:1566–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Paul A, Wiedmann T, Barrett J, Minx J, Scott K, Dawkins E, Owen A, Briggs J, Gray I (2010) The Resources and Energy Analysis Programme (REAP), Available at: https://www.sei.org/publications/resources-energy-analysis-programme-reap/

  34. Flammini A, Puri M, Pluschke L, Dubois O (2014) Walking the nexus talk: assessing the water-energy-food nexus in the context of the sustainable energy for all initiative. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

  35. FAO (2019) Diagnostic tools for investments in water for agriculture and energy, Available at: http://www.fao.org/land-water/databases-and-software/diagnostic-tools-for-investment/en/

  36. Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR, Haney EB, Neitsch SL (2012) Soil and water assessment tool: input/output documentation version 2012. Water Resources Institute, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  37. D’Odorico P, Davis KF, Rosa L, Carr JA, Chiarelli D, Dell’Angelo J, Gephart J, MacDonald GK, Seekell DA, Suweis S, Rulli MC (2018) The global food-energy-water nexus. Rev Geophys 56(3):456–531. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017rg000591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gazal AA, Gheewala SH, Silalertruksa T, Jakrawatana N (in press) Water–energy–food nexus review for biofuels assessment. Int J Renew Energy Dev

  39. Aleixandre-Tudó JL, Castelló-Cogollos L, Aleixandre JL, Aleixandre-Benavent R (2019) Renewable energies: worldwide trends in research, funding, and international collaboration. Renew Energy 139:268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.07

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Willis HH, Groves DG, Ringel JS, Mao Z, Efron S, Abbott M (2016) Developing the pardee RAND food-energy-water security index: toward a global standardized, quantitative, and transparent resource assessment. RAND

  41. Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH (2018) Land-water-energy nexus of sugarcane production in Thailand. J Clean Prod 182:521–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH (2019) Land–water–energy nexus of biofuels development in emerging economies. Role Bioenerg Bioecon 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813056-8.00008-x

  43. Ngammuangtueng P, Jakrawatana N, Nilsalab P, Gheewala SH (2019) Water, energy, and food nexus in rice production in Thailand. Sustainability 11(20):5852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yuan K-Y, Lin Y-C, Chiueh P-T, Lo S-L (2018) Spatial optimization of the food, energy, and water nexus: a life cycle assessment-based approach. Energy Policy 119:502–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.009

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Jaroenkietkajorn U, Gheewala SH (2020) Interlinkage between water-energy-food for oil palm cultivation in Thailand. Sustain Prod Consump 22:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. El-Gafy I (2017) Water–food–energy nexus index: analysis of water–energy–food nexus of crop’s production system applying the indicators approach. Appl Water Sci 7(6):2857–2868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0551-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. El Youssfi L, Doorsamy W, Aghzar A, Cherkaoui SI, Elouadi I, Faundez AG, Salazar DR (2020) Review of water energy food nexus in Africa: Morocco and South Africa as case studies. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 183, p. 02002). EDP Sciences

  48. Mabhaudhi T, Simpson G, Badenhorst J, Mohammed M, Motongera T, Senzanje A, Mpandeli S (2018) Assessing the state of the water-energy-food (WEF) nexus in South Africa. Water Research Commission (WRC): Pretoria, South Africa, 76

  49. Kougias I, Szabó S, Scarlat N, Monforti F, Banja M, Bódis K, Moner-Girona M (2018) Water-energy-food nexus interactions assessment: renewable energy sources to support water access and quality in West Africa, Luxembourg, European Commission, EUR 29196 EN, ISBN 978–92–79–84034–0, https://doi.org/10.2760/1796

  50. Botai JO, Botai CM, Ncongwane KP, Mpandeli S, Nhamo L, Masinde M, Adeola AM, Mengistu MG, Tazvinga H, Murambadoro MD, Lottering S, Motochi I, Hayombe P, Zwane NN, Wamiti EK, Mabhaudhi T (2021) A review of the water–energy–food nexus research in Africa. Sustainability 13(4):1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Moioli E, Salvati F, Chiesa M, Siecha RT, Manenti F, Laio F, Rulli MC (2018) Analysis of the current world biofuel production under a water–food–energy nexus perspective. Adv Water Resour 121:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hailemariam WG, Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH, Jakrawatana N (2019) Water–energy–food nexus of sugarcane production in Ethiopia. Environ Eng Sci 36(7):798–807. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2018.0549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. CONAB (2018) Conab - Fechamento da safra 2018/19 aponta produção recorde de grãos de 242,1 milhões de t. www.conab.gov.br. Retrieved september 19, 2021, from https://www.conab.gov.br/ultimas-noticias/3042-fechamento-da-safra-2018-2019-aponta-producao-recorde-de-graos-estimada-em-242-1-milhoes-de-t

  54. UNICA (2021) Brazilian sugarcane industry association. http://english.unica.com.br/. Retrieved September 10, 2011

  55. MAPA (2018) Ministério Da Agricultura, Pecuária E Abastecimento. Retrieved september 16, 2021, from https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/internacional/english

  56. FRN (2017) Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette of the Nigerian Bio-fuel Policy and Incentives. Retrieved September 11, 2021, from https://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/laws/1517.pdf

  57. Macedo IC, Seabra JEA, Silva JEAR (2008) Greenhouse gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. Biomass Bioenerg 32(7):582–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.006

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Seabra JEA, Macedo IC, Chum HL, Faroni CE, Sarto CA (2011) Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5(5):519–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. De Gorter H, Drabik D, Kliauga Govinda E, Timilsina R (2013) An economic model of Brazil’s ethanol-sugar markets and impacts of fuel policies. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/581471468226154985/pdf/WPS6524.pdf

  60. Karimi M, RajabiPour A, Tabatabaeefar A, Borghei A (2008) Energy analysis of sugarcane production in plant farms a case study in Debel Khazai Agro-industry in Iran. American-Eurasian journal of agricultural and environmental science 4(2):165–171

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zahedi M, Mondani F, Eshghizadeh HR (2015) Analysing the energy balances of double-cropped cereals in an arid region. Energy Rep 1:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2014.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zou X, Li Y, Cremades R, Gao Q, Wan Y, Qin X (2013) Cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving irrigation technologies based on climate change response: a case study of China. Agric Water Manag 129:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.07.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Chang Y, Li G, Yao Y, Zhang L, Yu C (2016) Quantifying the water-energy-food nexus: current status and trends. Energies 9(2):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9020065

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Hernandes TAD, Bufon VB, Seabra JEA (2013) Water footprint of biofuels in Brazil: assessing regional differences. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 8(2):241–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors would like to recognize the Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi and the Centre of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment (CEE), Ministry of Higher Education, Science (MHESI), Research, and Innovation for financial support to complete this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand

    Abass A. Gazal & Shabbir H. Gheewala

  2. Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment (CEE), Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand

    Abass A. Gazal & Shabbir H. Gheewala

  3. Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiangmai University, Chiangmai, Thailand

    Napat Jakrawatana

  4. Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand

    Thapat Silalertruksa

Authors
  1. Abass A. Gazal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Napat Jakrawatana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thapat Silalertruksa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shabbir H. Gheewala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AAG and SHG conceived the WELF nexus for bioethanol development idea and presented the manuscript. TS and NJ assessed the manuscript and gave ideas on how improve it. SHG did the final checks and verification.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shabbir H. Gheewala.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gazal, A.A., Jakrawatana, N., Silalertruksa, T. et al. Water-energy-land-food nexus for bioethanol development in Nigeria. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 1749–1762 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02528-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02528-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation