Skip to main content
Log in

Research of the two-step pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass based on the cross-coupling of components by Py-GC/MS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-step pyrolysis (TSP) of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin; the three-component cross-coupling samples; and the acid-washed walnut shell (AWS) were carried out by a pyrolysis–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) to investigate the effects of components and their proportions on the TSP of biomass. The results showed that different components dominated the formation of different products. Cellulose generated more furans and carbohydrates in both the first (S1) and second steps (S2). Hemicellulose achieved higher selectivity of ketones, acids, and alcohols in S1, and higher selectivity of hydrocarbons in S2. Lignin mainly produced phenols in S1, and hydrocarbons and phenols in S2. The increase of holocellulose (hemicellulose and cellulose) improved the contents of aldehydes, ketones, furans, acids, and alcohols but reduced the content of phenols in S1. In S2, more holocellulose increased the contents of aldehydes, ketones, and acids, but decreased the contents of phenols, hydrocarbons, and alcohols. The generation of carbohydrates was strongly inhibited in S1 by hemicellulose and lignin. More cellulose improved the contents of aldehydes, acids, and furans in S1, and increased the content of ketones but reduced the content of acids in S2. Hemicellulose facilitated the generation of hydrocarbons, but inhabited the produce of carbohydrates in S2. The small amount of the low-content components (protein, alkali and alkaline earth metals, etc.) and the connection structure of the components resulted in the significant difference in the pyrolysis reactions and product distribution of AWS and the mixed sample with corresponding component proportion. Therefore, more influence factors, such as the low-content components, the connection structure of the components, and different pyrolysis conditions, should be considered in the near future to investigate the interactions on the two or more components in TSP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig.3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TSP:

Two-step pyrolysis

S1:

The first step pyrolysis

S2:

The second step pyrolysis

RT:

Residence time

Py-GC/MS:

Pyrolysis–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

GC/MS:

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

C:

Cellulose

H:

Hemicellulose

L:

Lignin

C1H1L1:

The mixture of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin with the mass ratio of 1:1:1

C1H1L2:

The mixture of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin with the mass ratio of 1:1:2

C1H2L1:

The mixture of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin with the mass ratio of 1:2:1

C2H1L1:

The mixture of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin with the mass ratio of 2:1:1

C5H4L10:

The mixture of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin with the mass ratio of 5:4:10

AWS:

Acid-washed walnut shell

AAEMs:

Alkali and alkaline earth metals

References

  1. Dada TK, Sheehan M, Murugavelh S, Antunes E (2021) A review on catalytic pyrolysis for high-quality bio-oil production from biomass. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01391-3

  2. Meile K, Dobele G, Iljina N, Zhurinsh A, Jurkjane V (2021) Lignocellulose pyrolysis by-products as an underestimated source of chemicals: separation and characterisation. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01540-8

  3. Nisar J, Rahman A, Ali G, Shah A, Farooqi ZH, Bhatti IA, Iqbal M, Ur Rehman N (2020) Pyrolysis of almond shells waste: effect of zinc oxide on kinetics and product distribution. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00762-6

  4. Louwes AC, Halfwerk RB, Bramer EA, Brem G (2020) Experimental study on fast pyrolysis of raw and torrefied woody biomass. Energy Technology 8 (7). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201900799

  5. Ma S-w, Zhang G, Li H, Zhang Z-x, Li K, Lu Q (2020) Catalytic fast pyrolysis of walnut shell with K/AC catalyst for the production of phenolic-rich bio-oil. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00799-7

  6. Wang S, Dai G, Yang H, Luo Z (2017) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: a state-of-the-art review. Prog Energy Combust Sci 62:33–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang L, Li S, Li K, Zhu X (2018) Two-step pyrolysis of corncob for value-added chemicals and high quality bio-oil: effects of pyrolysis temperature and residence time. Energy Convers Manage 166:260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang L, Liu J, Yang Z, Li S, Wang X, Lin R (2021) Two-step catalytic pyrolysis behavior and product distribution of rice husk impregnated with zinc acetate. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105022

  9. De Wild PJ, Uil Hd, Reith JH, Kiel JHA, Heeres HJ (2009) Biomass valorisation by staged degasification. J Anal Appl Pyrol 85(1–2):124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Persson H, Han T, Sandström L, Xia W, Evangelopoulos P, Yang W (2018) Fractionation of liquid products from pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass by stepwise thermal treatment. Energy 154:346–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cai W, Liu Q, Shen D, Wang J (2019) Py-GC/MS analysis on product distribution of two-staged biomass pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 138:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang L, Li S, Ding H, Zhu X (2019) Two-step pyrolysis of corncob for value-added chemicals and high-quality bio-oil: effects of alkali and alkaline earth metals. Waste Manage 87:709–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86(12–13):1781–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang Y, Wei L, Crandall Z, Julson J, Gu Z (2015) Combining Mo–Cu/HZSM-5 with a two-stage catalytic pyrolysis system for pine sawdust thermal conversion. Fuel 150:656–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivilli P L, Alarcón R, Isasmendi G L, Pérez J D (2011). Stepwise isothermal fast pyrolysis (sifp). part II. sifp of peanut shells - antifungal properties of phenolic fractions. Bioresources 7(1):112–117. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.1.0112-0117

  16. Luna N S, Rivilli P L, Pérez J D (2014). Stepwise isothermal fast pyrolysis (sifp) of biomass. part III. sifp of olive oil industry wastes. Bioresources 9(1): 171–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.1.171-175

  17. Long Y, Zhou H, Meng A, Li Q, Zhang Y (2016) Interactions among biomass components during co-pyrolysis in (macro)thermogravimetric analyzers. Korean J Chem Eng 33(9):2638–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0102-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2007) Cellulose–hemicellulose and cellulose–lignin interactions in wood pyrolysis at gasification temperature. J Anal Appl Pyrol 80(1):118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2007.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang S, Guo X, Wang K, Luo Z (2011) Influence of the interaction of components on the pyrolysis behavior of biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrol 91(1):183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang L, Li S, Huang L, Zhu X (2019) Two-step pyrolysis characteristic of cellulose: effects of pyrolysis temperature and residence time. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 41(20):2481–2493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1568630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang L, Li S, Yang Z, Wang X, Li D, Lin R (2021) Comparative study on the two-step and one-step pyrolysis of lignin: effects of pyrolysis temperature and residence time on the product distribution. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01433-w

  22. Zhang L, Huang L, Li S, Zhu X (2018) Study on two-step pyrolysis of walnut shell coupled with acid washing pretreatment. J Anal Appl Pyrol 136:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ohra-aho T, Linnekoski J (2015) Catalytic pyrolysis of lignin by using analytical pyrolysis-GC–MS. J Anal Appl Pyrol 113:186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin X, Zhang Z, Wang Q, Sun J (2020) Interactions between biomass-derived components and polypropylene during wood–plastic composite pyrolysis. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00861-4

  25. Liu C, Duan X, Chen Q, Chao C, Lu Z, Lai Q, Megharaj M (2019) Investigations on pyrolysis of microalgae Diplosphaera sp. MM1 by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS: products and kinetics. Bioresource Technology 294:122126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122126

  26. Collard F-X, Blin J (2014) A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:594–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kawamoto H (2017) Lignin pyrolysis reactions. J Wood Sci 63(2):117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-016-1606-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu Q, Tian H-y, Hu B, Jiang X-y, Dong C-q, Yang Y-p (2016) Pyrolysis mechanism of holocellulose-based monosaccharides: the formation of hydroxyacetaldehyde. J Anal Appl Pyrol 120:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Q, Wang S, Zheng Y, Luo Z, Cen K (2008) Mechanism study of wood lignin pyrolysis by using TG–FTIR analysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 82(1):170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Usino DO, Supriyanto, Ylitervo P, Pettersson A, Richards T (2020) Influence of temperature and time on initial pyrolysis of cellulose and xylan. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104782

  31. Kawamoto H, Murayama M, Saka S (2003) Pyrolysis behavior of levoglucosan as an intermediate in cellulose pyrolysis: polymerization into polysaccharide as a key reaction to carbonized product formation. J Wood Sci 49(5):469–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-002-0487-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Qiao Q, Li X, Huang L (2019) Crystalline cellulose under pyrolysis conditions: the structure–property evolution via reactive molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Eng Data 65(2):360–372. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.9b00701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang X, Xu A, Bu X, Huang Y, Ran J (2021) Improved conversion of levoglucosenone into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in a biphasic system. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01549-z

  34. Smith MW, Pecha B, Helms G, Scudiero L, Garcia-Perez M (2017) Chemical and morphological evaluation of chars produced from primary biomass constituents: cellulose, xylan, and lignin. Biomass Bioenerg 104:17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Arapova OV, Chistyakov AV, Tsodikov MV, Moiseev II (2020) Lignin as a renewable resource of hydrocarbon products and energy carriers (a review). Pet Chem 60(3):227–243. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965544120030044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu C, Hu J, Zhang H, Xiao R (2016) Thermal conversion of lignin to phenols: relevance between chemical structure and pyrolysis behaviors. Fuel 182:864–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim J-Y, Moon J, Lee JH, Jin X, Choi JW (2020) Conversion of phenol intermediates into aromatic hydrocarbons over various zeolites during lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118484

  38. Zhao S, Liu M, Zhao L, Zhu L (2018) Influence of interactions among three biomass components on the pyrolysis behavior. Ind Eng Chem Res 57(15):5241–5249. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hilbers TJ, Wang Z, Pecha B, Westerhof RJM, Kersten SRA, Pelaez-Samaniego MR, Garcia-Perez M (2015) Cellulose-lignin interactions during slow and fast pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 114:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.05.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu S, Shen D, Hu J, Zhang H, Xiao R (2016) Cellulose-lignin interactions during fast pyrolysis with different temperatures and mixing methods. Biomass Bioenerg 90:209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao C, Jiang E, Chen A (2017) Volatile production from pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J Energy Inst 90(6):902–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu Y, Wu S, Zhang H, Xiao R (2018) Cellulose-lignin interactions during catalytic pyrolysis with different zeolite catalysts. Fuel Process Technol 179:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li K, Zhu C, Zhang L, Zhu X (2016) Study on pyrolysis characteristics of lignocellulosic biomass impregnated with ammonia source. Biores Technol 209:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shen D, Xiao R, Gu S, Luo K (2011) The pyrolytic behavior of cellulose in lignocellulosic biomass: a review. RSC Advances 1 (9). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ra00534k

  45. Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2009) Solid/liquid- and vapor-phase interactions between cellulose- and lignin-derived pyrolysis products. J Anal Appl Pyrol 85(1–2):237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Patwardhan PR, Dalluge DL, Shanks BH, Brown RC (2011) Distinguishing primary and secondary reactions of cellulose pyrolysis. Biores Technol 102(8):5265–5269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bai X, Kim KH, Brown RC, Dalluge E, Hutchinson C, Lee YJ, Dalluge D (2014) Formation of phenolic oligomers during fast pyrolysis of lignin. Fuel 128:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2008) Secondary reactions of lignin-derived primary tar components. J Anal Appl Pyrol 83(1):78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jiang G, Nowakowski DJ, Bridgwater AV (2010) Effect of the temperature on the composition of lignin pyrolysis products. Energy Fuels 24(8):4470–4475. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef100363c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Batista Júnior R, Silvério BC, Soares RR, Xavier TP, Lira TS, Santos KG (2021) Response surface methodology applied to spent coffee residue pyrolysis: effect of temperature and heating rate on product yield and product characterization. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01536-4

  51. Chen W-H, Chu Y-S, Liu J-L, Chang J-S (2018) Thermal degradation of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids in microalgae analyzed by evolutionary computation. Energy Convers Manage 160:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.01.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lv D, Xu M, Liu X, Zhan Z, Li Z, Yao H (2010) Effect of cellulose, lignin, alkali and alkaline earth metallic species on biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Fuel Process Technol 91(8):903–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dong Q, Zhang S, Zhang L, Ding K, Xiong Y (2015) Effects of four types of dilute acid washing on moso bamboo pyrolysis using Py-GC/MS. Biores Technol 185:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Fan Y, Cai Y, Li X, Jiao L, Xia J, Deng X (2017) Effects of the cellulose, xylan and lignin constituents on biomass pyrolysis characteristics and bio-oil composition using the Simplex Lattice Mixture Design method. Energy Convers Manage 138:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20CX06028A), the Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Research Project (qdyy20190030), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874333).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liqiang Zhang or Riyi Lin.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Two-step pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin were studied.

• Interactions among the three components in the two-step pyrolysis were analyzed.

• Two-step pyrolysis of biomass and the proportional component mixture were compared.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 33 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Liu, J., Zhang, Z. et al. Research of the two-step pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass based on the cross-coupling of components by Py-GC/MS. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 11789–11802 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01993-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01993-x

Keywords

Navigation