Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling sustainability of a demand-based biomass to biogas conversion system: a bio-mimicry feedstock inventory-based approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biogas from anaerobic digestion of biomass is one of the potential renewable energy sources been considered for adoption in sub-Saharan Africa. Unfortunately, the issue of sustainability of feedstock supply in the biomass to biogas conversion system has been reported as one of the major factors militating against the adoption. Sometimes this challenge of not being able to meet feedstock demand is discovered during the production stage, as most designs reviewed did not incorporate a plan for sustainable supply of feedstock. Considering the enormous resources involved in the development of a bio-digester, it is, therefore, expedient to implement robust model(s) at the design stage, such that it can ascertain sustainability of continuous biomass supply necessary for meeting the biogas demand for all the specified periods. The concept of bio-mimicry with a focus on predator-prey interaction was adopted in developing an inventory-based model that enables the designers of the system to ascertain the critical start-up inventory of the prey(biomass) that will ensure sustained biogas production (predator existence) based on known demand level. The developed model was found useful in determining the minimum start-up biomass prior to production and in determining the level of sustainability for any given start-up inventory. It also provided the basis for decision-making in the commencement of biogas production from a given feedstock source.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassan A, Rahman S, Tasneem F, Bin M, Zawad M (2012) Electricity challenge for sustainable future in Bangladesh. APCBEE Procedia 1:346–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oyedepo SO (2014) Towards achieving energy for sustainable development in Nigeria. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pathak S (2014) Energy crisis: a review. Int J Eng Res Appl 4(3):845–851 www.ijera.com ISSN : 2248–9622

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bacenetti J, Baboun SH, Demery F, Aburdeineh I, Fiala M (2016) Environmental impact assessment of electricity generation from biogas in Palestine. Environ Eng Manag J 15(9):1915–1922 http://omicron.ch.tuiasi.ro/EEMJ/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaete-morales C, Gallego-schmid A, Stamford L, Azapagic A (2018) Assessing the environmental sustainability of electricity generation in Chile. Sci Total Environ 636:1155–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yousuf A, Khan MR, Wahid ZA, Pirozzi D, Rahmaddulla SRB (2017) Business models for sustainability of biogas technology. Soc Sci 12(4):609–616

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yazan DM, Cafagna D, Fraccascia L, Mes M, Pontrandolfo P, Zijm H (2018) Economic sustainability of biogas production from animal manure: a regional circular economy model. Manag Res Rev 41:605–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2018-0053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okwu MO, Otanocha O, Balogun P, Otega O (2018) Comparative performance of load bearing characteristics of biogas and gasoline fueled electric generator. Int J Ambient Energy 41:1377–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1517669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okwu MO, David S, Otanocha O, Balogun P, Otega O, Ojo E (2020) Design and development of a bio-digester for production of biogas from dual waste. World J Eng 17:247–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-07-2018-0249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haque I, Rozakis S, Ganko E, Kallivroussis L (2009) Bio-energy production in the sugar industry: an integrated modeling approach. A Paper prepared for presentation at the 113th EAAE Seminar “A resilient European food industry and food chain in a challenging world”, Chania, Crete, Greece, September 3–6

  11. Subramani T, Nallathambi M (2012) Mathematical model for commercial production of bio-gas from sewage water and kitchen waste. Int J Mod Eng Res 2(4):1588–1595

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simonyan KJ, Fasina O (2013) Biomass resources and bioenergy potentials in Nigeria. Afr J Agric Res 8(40):4975–4989. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.6726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dinova N, Belouhova M, Schneider I, Rangelov J, Topalova Y (2018) Control of biogas production process by enzymatic and fluorescent image analysis. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip:1–10

  14. Fagundes DS, Junior MAPO, Orrico ACA, Seno LO (2015) Mathematical models of anaerobic digestion for treatment of swine effluents. Pesq Agropec Trop Goiania 45(2):172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ojolo SJ, Bamgboye AI, Ogunsina B, Oke SA (2008) Analytical approach for predicting biogas generation in a municipal solid waste anaerobic digester. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng 5(3):179–186

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kana EBG, Oloke JK, Lateef A, Adesiyan MO (2012) Modeling and optimization of biogas production on saw dust and other co-substrates using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Renew Energy 46:276–281 www.elsevier.com/locate/renene

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiely G, Tayfur G, Dolan C, Tanji K (1997) Physical and mathematical modelling of anaerobic digestion of organic wastes. Water Res 31(3):534–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00175-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Igoni AH, Sepiribo Iand Harry K (2016) Modelling design of anaerobic continuous digesters for municipal solid waste in biogas production. Int J Chem Environ Eng 7(3):130–140

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ali A, Rundong L, Shah F, Mahar RB, WajidIjaz M, Sallahuddin, Muqueet M (2016) Predictive modeling of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of mixed kitchen waste at mesophilic temperature. Int J Waste Resour 6(3):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaur RZ, Suthar S (2017) Anaerobic digestion of activated sludge, anaerobic granular sludge and cow dung with food waste for enhanced methane production. J Clean Prod 164:557–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salam B, Biswas S, Rabbi MS (2015) Biogas from mesophilic anaerobic digestion of cow dung using silica gel as catalyst. Procedia Eng 105:652–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zareei S, Khodaei J (2017) Modeling and optimization of biogas production from cow manure and maize straw using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Renew Energy 114:423–427 26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Safari M, Abdi R, Adl M, Kafashan J (2018) Optimization of bio gas productivity in lab-scale by response surface methodology. Renew Energy 118:368–375 27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kainthola J, Kalamdhad AS, Goud VV (2020) Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste. Renew Energy 149:1352–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tasnim F, Iqbal SA, Chowdhury AR (2017) Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure with kitchen waste and water hyacinth. Renew Energy 109:434–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alfa IM, Dahunsi SO, Iorhemen OT, Okafor CC, Ajayi SA (2014) Comparative evaluation of biogas production from poultry droppings, Cow dung and Lemon grass. Bioresour Technol 157:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abu-Dahrieh JK, Orozco A, Ahmad M and Rooney D (2011) The potential for biogas production from grass. In: Jordan International Energy Conference, Amman, 2011

  28. Tilvikienė V, Venslauskas K, Navickas K, Župerka V, Dabkevičius Z, Kadžiulienė Ž (2012) The biomass and biogas productivity of perennial grasses. Žemdirbystė=Agriculture 99(1):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sawasdee V, Pisutpaisal N (2014) Feasibility of biogas production from napier grass. Energy Procedia 61:1229–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Summoogum-utchanah SL, Poorneema D (2015) An investigation on the potential of biogas production from elephant grass and guinea grass. Am Int J Res Sci Technol Eng Math 9(2):194–197

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dussadee N, Unpaprom Y and Ramaraj R (2016) Grass silage for biogas production. In: da Silva T. and Santos EM (ed) Advances in Silage Production and Utilization. Online:InTech

  32. Boscardo D, Pezzuolo A, Sartori L, Marinello F, Grigolato S, Santacroce C (2017) Grass supply chains for biogas production. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 82(4):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chuanchai A, Ramaraj R (2018) Sustainability assessment of biogas production from buffalo grass and dung: biogas purification and bio-fertilizer, 3. Biotech. 8(151):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mbachu VM, Igboanugo AC, Alukwe UJ (2019) Development of enhanced substrate from fresh elephant grass for biogas production. Int J Sci Technol Res 8(4):44–49

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mbachu VM, Igboanugo AC, Alukwe UJ, Okwu MO (2021) Enhanced biogas production from fresh elephant grasses, using liquid extract from plantain pseudo stem. Int J Sci Technol Res 10(3):123–127

    Google Scholar 

  36. Debnath KB, Mourshed M, Chew SPK (2015) Modelling and forecasting energy demand in rural households of Bangladesh. Energy Procedia 75:2731–2737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rennuit C, Sommer SG (2013) Decision support for the construction of farm-scale biogas digesters in developing countries with cold seasons. Energies 6:5314–5332

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

    Victor M. Mbachu

  2. Department of Production Engineering, University of Benin, Benin, Edo, Nigeria

    G. C. Ovuworie

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun, Delta State, Nigeria

    Modestus O. Okwu

  4. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Modestus O. Okwu & Lagouge K. Tartibu

Authors
  1. Victor M. Mbachu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. C. Ovuworie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Modestus O. Okwu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lagouge K. Tartibu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Victor M. Mbachu or Modestus O. Okwu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mbachu, V.M., Ovuworie, G.C., Okwu, M.O. et al. Modelling sustainability of a demand-based biomass to biogas conversion system: a bio-mimicry feedstock inventory-based approach. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 4957–4963 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01581-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01581-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation