Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydrothermal vs. dilute acid pre-treatments: comparison of the biomass properties, distribution of pyrolysis products, and bio-oil characteristics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, hydrothermal and acid pre-treatments were applied to improve the raw material properties of the bean pod. To evaluate the biomass as a fuel, it is superior to have low moisture content, high volatile matter, and carbon content. As acid concentration changed in acid washing and impregnation, different trends were observed in these contents. The optimum working concentration to meet all these properties was chosen as 1 M acid. In hydrothermal pre-treatment, as the temperature increased with constant reaction time, the moisture content of the biomass decreased while the amount of volatile matter was raised. According to the SEM, FT-IR, TGA, and preliminary and elemental analysis characterization results, the samples with high C and low O content after evaluating in hydrothermal pre-treatment at 190 °C for 20 min and hydrothermal pre-treatment at 150 °C for 20 min, washing with 1 M H3PO4, and impregnating with 1 M H3PO4 were subjected to pyrolysis process. When the tar yields obtained from impregnating with 1 M H3PO4 and washing with 1 M H3PO4 samples were compared, it was seen that the washing process gave a higher (19.56%) tar yield. In the pyrolysis experiments, the highest tar yield (22.18%) was achieved by using the hydrothermal pre-treatment at 190 °C for 20 min sample with a volatile matter content of 71.59%. Total volatile matter yields of pyrolysis were listed as (hydrothermal pre-treatment at 190 °C for 20 min) > (washing with 1 M H3PO4) > (impregnating with 1 M H3PO4) > (hydrothermal pre-treatment at 150 °C for 20 min). As a result, it can be concluded that the processes performed as hydrothermal method or acidic pre-treatment compared to raw biomass have an important role in obtaining the desired product distribution and properties in biofuel production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ghysels S, Ronsse F, Dickinson D, Prins W (2019) Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar from lignin-rich digested stillage from lignocellulosic ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 122:349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burhenne L, Messmera J, Aicher T, Laborie MP (2013) The effect of the biomass components lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose on TGA and fixed bed pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 101:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen DK, Gu S (2009) The mechanism for thermal decomposition of cellulose and its main products. Bioresour Technol 100:6496–6504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen DK, Gu S, Bridgwater AV (2010) Study on the pyrolytic behaviour of xylan-based hemicellulose using TG–FTIR and Py–GC–FTIR. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 87:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2009.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawamoto H, Nakamura T, Saka S (2008) Pyrolytic cleavage mechanisms of lignin-ether linkages: a study on p-substituted dimers and trimers. Holzforschung 62:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2008.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bridgwater AV (2012) Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 38:68–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akhtar J, Amin NAS (2011) A review on process conditions for optimum bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:1615–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Toor SS, Rosendahl L, Rudolf A (2011) Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: a review of subcritical water technologies. Energy 36:2328–2342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi T, Kohn B, Holmes L, Faulkner R, Davis M, Maciel GE (2011) Molecular-level consequences of biomass pretreatment by dilute sulfuric acid at various temperatures. Energy Fuel 25:1790–1797. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef1017219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson TR, Cheng YT, Jae J, Huber GW (2011) Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic fast pyrolysis of wood sawdust. Energy Environ Sci 1(4):145–161. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00341G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thangalazhy-Gopakumar S, Adhikari S, Gupta RB (2012) Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass over H+ZSM-5 under hydrogen pressure. Energy Fuel 26:5300–5306. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef3008213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng Y, Shi J, Tu M, Cheng YS (2017) Principles and development of lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment for biofuels. Advances in Bioenergy, Vol. 2-1st Edition, Elsevier.

  13. Kumagai S, Matsuno R, Grause G, Kameda T, Yoshioko T (2015) Enhancement of bio-oil production via pyrolysis of wood biomass by pretreatment with H2SO4. Bioresour Technol 178:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan EM, Steele PH, Ingram L (2009) Characterization of fast pyrolysis bio-oils produced from pretreated pine wood. Appl Biochem 154:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8445-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H, Srinivasan R, Yu F, Steele P, Li Q, Mitchell B, Samala A (2012) Effect of acid, steam explosion, and size reduction pretreatments on bio-oil production from sweetgum, switchgrass, and corn stover. Appl Biochem 167:285–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-9678-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pu Y, Hu F, Huang F, Davison BH, Ragauskas AJ (2013) Assessing the molecular structure basis for biomass recalcitrance during dilute acid and hydrothermal pretreatments. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(15):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vegas R, Kabel M, Schols HA, Alonso JL, Parajo JC (2008) Hydrothermal processing of rice husks: effects of severity on product distribution. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 83:965–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruiz H, Rodriguez-Jasso RM, Fernandes BD, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA (2013) Hydrothermal processing, as an alternative for upgrading agriculture residues and marine biomass according to the biorefinery concept: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21:35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hao N, Bezerra TL, Wu Q, Ben H, Sun Q, Adhikari S, Ragauskas AJ (2017) Effect of autohydrolysis pretreatment on biomass structure and the resulting bio-oil from a pyrolysis process. Fuel 206:494–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484–489. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stefanidis SD, Kalogiannis KG, Iliopoulou EF, Michailof CM, Pilavachi PA, Lappas AA (2014) A study of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis via the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 105:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. TMMOB, Ziraat Mühendisleri odası, 2018 yılı Fasulye (Kuru) Raporu, http://zmo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=30014&tipi=38&sube=0" http://zmo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=30014&tipi=38&sube=0, Access date: 25.04.2020.

  23. ASTM Standard test method for bulk density of densified particulate biomass fuels, In ASTM Annual Book of Ame. Soc. for Testing and Materials Standard, Easton, M.D., USA, E 873-82, 1983.

  24. ASTM Standard test method for ash in wood, In ASTM Annual Book of Ame. Soc. for Testing and Materials Standard, Easton, M.D., USA, D-1102-84, 1983.

  25. ASTM Standard test method for volatile matter in analysis sample refuse derived fuel-3, In ASTM Annual Book of Ame. Soc. for Testing and Materials Standard, Easton, M.D., USA, E-897-82, 1983.

  26. Harker JH, Backhurst JR (1981) Fuel and energy 120, 1st edn. Academic Press Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uzun BB, Yaman E (2014) Thermogravimetric characteristics and kinetics of scrap tyre and Juglans regia shell co-pyrolysis. Waste Manag Res 32(10):961–970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14539722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fermanelli CS, Córdoba A, Pierella LB, Saux C (2020) Pyrolysis and copyrolysis of three lignocellulosic biomass residues from the agro-food industry: a comparative study. Waste Manag 102(2020):362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosas JM, Bedia J, Rodríguez-Mirasol J, Cordero T (2009) HEMP-derived activated carbon fibers by chemical activation with phosphoric acid. Fuel 88(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2008.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Labruquere S, Pailler R, Naslain R, Desbat B (1998) Oxidation inhibition of carbon fibre preforms and C/C composites by H3PO4. J Eur Ceram Soc 18(13):1953–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00135-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nowakowski DJ, Woodbridge CR, Jones JM (2008) Phosphorus catalysis in the pyrolysis behaviour of biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 83(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2008.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Guo F, Peng K, Liang S, Jia X, Jiang X, Qian L (2019) Evaluation of the catalytic performance of different activated biochar catalysts for removal of tar from biomass pyrolysis. Fuel 258:116204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bi H, Wang C, Lin Q, Jiang X, Jiang C, Bao L (2020) Pyrolysis characteristics, artificial neural network modeling and environmental impact of coal gangue and biomass by TG-FTIR. Sci Total Environ 751:142293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Molina-Sabio M, Rodrıguez-Reinoso F (2004) Role of chemical activation in the development of carbon porosity. Colloid Surf A 241(1-3):15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Caillat S, Vakkilainen E (2013) Large-scale biomass combustion plants: an overview. Biomass Combustion Science, Technology and Engineering. Woodhead Publishing, 189-224.

  36. Ozbay N, Yargic AS, Sahin RZY, Yaman E (2019) Valorization of banana peel waste via in-situ catalytic pyrolysis using Al-Modified SBA-15. Renew Energy 140:633–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang Z, Cao J, Wang J (2009) Pyrolytic characteristics of pine wood in a slowly heating and gas sweeping fixed-bed reactor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 84:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2009.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Çulcuoglu E, Ünay E, Karaosmanoglu F, Angin D, Şensöz S (2005) Characterization of the bio-oil of rapeseed cake. Energy Sources 27(13):1217–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310490479592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Özçimen D, Karaosmanoğlu F (2004) Production and characterization of bio-oil and biochar from rapeseed cake. Renew Energy 29(5):779–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2003.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar R, Strezov V, Weldekidan H, He J, Singh S, Kan T, Dastjerdi B (2020) Lignocellulose biomass pyrolysis for bio-oil production: a review of biomass pre-treatment methods for production of drop-in fuels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 123:109763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cao B, Wang S, Hu Y, Abomohra AE-F, Qian L, He Z, Wang Q, Uzoejinwa BB, Esakkimuthu S (2019) Effect of washing with diluted acids on Enteromorpha clathrata pyrolysis products: towards enhanced bio-oil from seaweeds. Renew Energy 138:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohammed IY, Abakr YA, Kazi FK, Yusuf S (2017) Effects of pretreatments of napier grass with deionized water, sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide on pyrolysis oil characteristics. Waste Biomass Valori 8:755–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9594-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang X, Leng S, Bai J, Zhou H, Zhong X, Zhuang G, Wang J (2015) Role of pretreatment with acid and base on the distribution of the products obtained via lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis. RSC Adv 5:24984–24989. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15426F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C, Zielinska B, Felix L (2013) Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of selected woody and herbaceous biomass feedstocks. Biomass Convers Biorefin 3:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-012-0066-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuel 25:1802–1810. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101745n

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University Scientific Research Council with the project number 2016-02.BŞEÜ.03-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurgül Özbay.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özbay, N., Yaman, E., Yargıç, A.Ş. et al. Hydrothermal vs. dilute acid pre-treatments: comparison of the biomass properties, distribution of pyrolysis products, and bio-oil characteristics. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 739–753 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01203-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01203-0

Keywords

Navigation