Fuel properties of biochar from torrefaction of ground coffee residue: effect of process temperature, time, and sweeping gas


Ground coffee residue (GCR) was torrified under nitrogen or carbon dioxide atmosphere. Effect of torrefaction parameters on fuel properties of biochar was investigated by varying process temperature, residence time, and sweeping gas flow rate over the range of 200–300 °C, 30–60 min, and 50–250 mL/min, respectively. Severe torrefaction (300 °C) short residence time (30 min) under low carbon dioxide flow rate (50 mL/min) was determined as a promising condition to produce biochar as solid fuel. H/C and O/C atomic ratios, HHV, and energy yield of the obtained biochar were 0.94 and 0.14, 31.12 MJ/kg, and 48.04%, respectively, which were comparable with the properties of sub-bituminous coal. The calculated decarbonization (DC), dehydrogenation (DH), and deoxygenation (DO) indicated that torrefaction led to major losses of oxygen and hydrogen. The analysis of thermal decomposition properties and surface chemical functional groups revealed that temperature substantially affected biochar properties, while the effect of sweeping gas was only marginal.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7


  1. 1.

    Chen W-H (2015) Chapter 10 - torrefaction. In: Pandey A, Negi S, Binod P, Larroche C (eds) Pretreatment of biomass. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800080-9.00010-4

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gent S, Twedt M, Gerometta C, Almberg E (2017) Chapter three - fundamental theories of torrefaction by thermochemical conversion. In: Gent S, Twedt M, Gerometta C, Almberg E (eds) Theoretical and applied aspects of biomass Torrefaction. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 41–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809483-9.00003-8

  3. 3.

    Li S-X, Chen C-Z, Li M-F, Xiao X (2018) Torrefaction of corncob to produce charcoal under nitrogen and carbon dioxide atmospheres. Bioresour Technol 249:348–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arias B, Pevida C, Fermoso J, Plaza MG, Rubiera F, Pis JJ (2008) Influence of torrefaction on the grindability and reactivity of woody biomass. Fuel Process Technol 89(2):169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Commandré JM, Leboeuf A (2015) Volatile yields and solid grindability after torrefaction of various biomass types. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 34(4):1180–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Li M-F, Li X, Bian J, Chen C-Z, Yu Y-T, Sun R-C (2015) Effect of temperature and holding time on bamboo torrefaction. Biomass Bioenergy 83:366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhang C, Ho S-H, Chen W-H, Xie Y, Liu Z, Chang J-S (2018) Torrefaction performance and energy usage of biomass wastes and their correlations with torrefaction severity index. Appl Energy 220:598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chai L, Saffron CM (2016) Comparing pelletization and torrefaction depots: optimization of depot capacity and biomass moisture to determine the minimum production cost. Appl Energy 163:387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Couhert C, Salvador S, Commandré JM (2009) Impact of torrefaction on syngas production from wood. Fuel 88(11):2286–2290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bach Q-V, Chen W-H, Chu Y-S, Skreiberg Ø (2016) Predictions of biochar yield and elemental composition during torrefaction of forest residues. Bioresour Technol 215:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Asadullah M, Adi AM, Suhada N, Malek NH, Saringat MI, Azdarpour A (2014) Optimization of palm kernel shell torrefaction to produce energy densified bio-coal. Energy Convers Manag 88:1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Duranay ND, Akkuş G (2019) Solid fuel production with torrefaction from vineyard pruning waste. Biomass:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00496-0

  13. 13.

    Hernández AB, Okonta F, Freeman N (2017) Sewage sludge charcoal production by N2- and CO2-torrefaction. J Environ Chem Eng 5(5):4406–4414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li M-F, Li X, Bian J, Xu J-K, Yang S, Sun R-C (2015) Influence of temperature on bamboo torrefaction under carbon dioxide atmosphere. Ind Crop Prod 76:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Alves RC, Rodrigues F, Antónia Nunes M, Vinha AF, Oliveira MBPP (2017) Chapter 1 - state of the art in coffee processing by-products. In: Galanakis CM (ed) Handbook of coffee processing by-products. Academic press, Cambridge, pp 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811290-8.00001-3

  16. 16.

    Centre for Agricultural Information, Agricultural Production Data (2017) URL, http://www.oae.go.th (Accessed 20 Oct 2019)

  17. 17.

    Murthy PS, Madhava Naidu M (2012) Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition—a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 66:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Choi IS, Wi SG, Kim S-B, Bae H-J (2012) Conversion of coffee residue waste into bioethanol with using popping pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 125:132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lamine SM, Ridha C, Mahfoud H-M, Mouad C, Lotfi B, Al-Dujaili AH (2014) Chemical activation of an activated carbon prepared from coffee residue. Energy Procedia 50:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mayanga-Torres PC, Lachos-Perez D, Rezende CA, Prado JM, Ma Z, Tompsett GT, Timko MT, Forster-Carneiro T (2017) Valorization of coffee industry residues by subcritical water hydrolysis: recovery of sugars and phenolic compounds. J Supercrit Fluids 120:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2016.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D. (2005) Determination of ash in biomass (NREL/TP-510-42622). The US National Renewable Energy Laboratory technical report. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/gen/fy08/42622.pdf. Accessed 17 November 2019

  22. 22.

    ASTM (2010) Standard test methods for proximate analysis of coal and coke by macro thermogravimetric analysis, method D7582-10. ASTM International, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., Crocker, D. (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass (NREL/TP-510-42618). The US National Renewable Energy Laboratory technical report. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/gen/fy13/42618.pdf. Accessed 17 November 2019

  24. 24.

    Chen Y-C, Chen W-H, Lin B-J, Chang J-S, Ong HC (2016) Impact of torrefaction on the composition, structure and reactivity of a microalga residue. Appl Energy 181:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chaiklangmuang S, Kurosawa K, Li L, Morishita K, Takarada T (2015) Thermal degradation behavior of coffee residue in comparison with biomasses and its product yields from gasification. J Energy Inst 88(3):323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2014.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fermoso J, Mašek O (2018) Thermochemical decomposition of coffee ground residues by TG-MS: a kinetic study. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 130:358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Janissen B, Huynh T (2018) Chemical composition and value-adding applications of coffee industry by-products: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 128:110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Li X, Strezov V, Kan T (2014) Energy recovery potential analysis of spent coffee grounds pyrolysis products. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 110:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nguyen QA, Cho E, Trinh LTP, Jeong JS, Bae HJ (2017) Development of an integrated process to produce d-mannose and bioethanol from coffee residue waste. Bioresour Technol 244(Pt 1):1039–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nakason K, Panyapinyopol B, Kanokkantapong V, Viriya-empikul N, Kraithong W, Pavasant P (2018) Characteristics of hydrochar and hydrothermal liquid products from hydrothermal carbonization of corncob. Biomass 8(1):199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0279-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nakason K, Panyapinyopol B, Kanokkantapong V, Viriya-empikul N, Kraithong W, Pavasant P (2018) Characteristics of hydrochar and liquid fraction from hydrothermal carbonization of cassava rhizome. J Energy Inst 91(2):184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Uemura Y, Omar WN, Tsutsui T, Yusup SB (2011) Torrefaction of oil palm wastes. Fuel 90(8):2585–2591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.03.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zheng A, Zhao Z, Chang S, Huang Z, Wang X, He F, Li H (2013) Effect of torrefaction on structure and fast pyrolysis behavior of corncobs. Bioresour Technol 128:370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chen W-H, Peng J, Bi XT (2015) A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:847–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chen W-H, Lin B-J, Colin B, Chang J-S, Pétrissans A, Bi X, Pétrissans M (2018) Hygroscopic transformation of woody biomass torrefaction for carbon storage. Appl Energy 231:768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Álvarez A, Nogueiro D, Pizarro C, Matos M, Bueno JL (2018) Non-oxidative torrefaction of biomass to enhance its fuel properties. Energy 158:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pilon G, Lavoie J-M (2013) Pyrolysis of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) at low temperatures within N2 and CO2 environments: product yield study. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1(1):198–204. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc300098e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Reza MT, Wirth B, Lüder U, Werner M (2014) Behavior of selected hydrolyzed and dehydrated products during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Bioresour Technol 169:352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Liu Z, Quek A, Kent Hoekman S, Balasubramanian R (2013) Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel 103:943–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Beychok M (2012) Coal. URL: http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/151276 (accessed Oct. 30, 2019)

  41. 41.

    Kim D, Lee K, Park KY (2016) Upgrading the characteristics of biochar from cellulose, lignin, and xylan for solid biofuel production from biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. J Ind Eng Chem 42:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kongpanya J, Hussaro K, Teekasap S (2014) Influence of reaction temperature and reaction time on product from hydrothermal treatment of biomass residue. Am J Environ Sci 10(4):324–335. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2014.324.335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Xin S, Mi T, Liu X, Huang F (2018) Effect of torrefaction on the pyrolysis characteristics of high moisture herbaceous residues. Energy 152:586–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wu K-T, Tsai C-J, Chen C-S, Chen H-W (2012) The characteristics of torrefied microalgae. Appl Energy 100:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gao Y, Wang X, Wang J, Li X, Cheng J, Yang H, Chen H (2013) Effect of residence time on chemical and structural properties of hydrochar obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of water hyacinth. Energy 58:376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research project is supported by the Mahidol University and Nanomaterial for Energy and Catalyst Laboratory, National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA). This study was partially supported for publication by the China Medical Board (CMB), Center of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology (EHT), Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamonwat Nakason.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material


(DOCX 53 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pathomrotsakun, J., Nakason, K., Kraithong, W. et al. Fuel properties of biochar from torrefaction of ground coffee residue: effect of process temperature, time, and sweeping gas. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 10, 743–753 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00632-1

Download citation


  • Sweeping gas flow rate
  • Torrefaction
  • Solid fuel
  • Biocoal
  • Waste biomass