Hydrothermal treatment of empty fruit bunch and its pyrolysis characteristics

Abstract

Empty fruit bunch (EFB) is abundantly available for renewable energy resource, especially in Southeast Asian countries. However, EFB has inherent problems such as high moisture content, low heating value, and high alkali metal content. In order to improve the quality of feedstock as a fuel, in this research, the effects of hydrothermal treatment (HT) on the hydrothermally treated EFB (HT-EFB) characteristics were investigated. Also, the pyrolysis characteristics of EFB and HT-EFB were examined. The experiments of hydrothermal treatment were carried out in a 500-mL hydrothermal reactor at the temperature range of 120 to 220 °C with 60 to 120 min holding time. Afterward, the pyrolysis experiments of EFB and hydrothermally treated EFB (HT-EFB) were conducted in a lab-scale isothermal tube furnace at 400 °C for 1 h. The gas product was periodically collected to create gas evolution profiles. The result showed that hydrothermal treatment improved the properties of EFB, such as higher fixed carbon, lower ash content, and higher energy density. Hydrothermal treatment caused an increase in the heating value of HT-EFB to 19.47 MJ/kg, while the ratio of volatile matter/(volatile matter + fixed carbon) decreased from 0.82 to 0.68. Employing hydrothermal treatment in EFB did not only reduce the ash content of the biomass but also reduced the contents of potassium and sodium. In addition, the gas product from HT-EFB pyrolysis resulted in higher content of CO, CH4, and H2. The identified liquid product of pyrolysis consisted of alkane groups, phenolic groups, aromatic groups, ketones, acids, alcohols, and ester, which may be used as liquid fuel or for chemical production after further treatment. The observation indicated that hydrothermal treatment is an appropriate method to improve the fuel characteristic of EFB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Faisal M, Mahidin (2013) Biomass residue from palm oil mills in Aceh Province: a potential usage for sustainable energy. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 3(3):32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Paltseva J, Searle S, Malins C (2016) Potential for advanced biofuel production from palm residues in Indonesia. S, The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hantoko D, Yan M, Prabowo B, Susanto H (2018) Preparation of empty fruit bunch as a feedstock for gasification process by employing hydrothermal treatment. Energy Procedia 152:1003–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Olisa YP, Kotingo KW (2014) Utilization of palm empty fruit fruit bunch (PEFB) as solid fuel for steam boiler. Eu J Eng Technol 2(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Salomon M, Gómez MF, Erlich C, Martin A (2013) Pelletization: an alternative for polygeneration in the palm oil industry. Biomass Conv Bioref 3(3):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Novianti S, Biddinika MK, Prawisudha P, Yoshikawa K (2014) Upgrading of palm oil empty fruit bunch employing hydrothermal treatment in lab-scale and pilot scale. Procedia Environ Sci 20:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tekin K, Karagöz S, Bektaş S (2014) A review of hydrothermal biomass processing. Renew Sust Energ Rev 40:673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lynam JG, Reza MT, Yan W, Vásquez VR, Coronella CJ (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of various lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Conv Bioref 5(2):173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nakason K, Panyapinyopol B, Kanokkantapong V, Viriya-empikul N, Kraithong W, Pavasant P (2018) Characteristics of hydrochar and hydrothermal liquid products from hydrothermal carbonization of corncob. Biomass Conv Bioref 8(1):199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Reza MT, Uddin MH, Lynam JG, Hoekman SK, Coronella CJ (2014) Hydrothermal carbonization of loblolly pine: reaction chemistry and water balance. Biomass Conv Bioref 4(4):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Román S, Nabais JMV, Laginhas C, Ledesma B, González JF (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization as an effective way of densifying the energy content of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 103:78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gao Y, H-p C, Wang J, Shi T, Yang H-P, Wang X-H (2011) Characterization of products from hydrothermal liquefaction and carbonation of biomass model compounds and real biomass. J Fuel Chem Technol 39(12):893–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuel 25(4):1802–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Moon J, Mun T-Y, Yang W, Lee U, Hwang J, Jang E, Choi C (2015) Effects of hydrothermal treatment of sewage sludge on pyrolysis and steam gasification. Energy Convers Manag 103:401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Novianti S, Nurdiawati A, Zaini IN, Prawisudha P, Sumida H, Yoshikawa K (2015) Low-potassium fuel production from empty fruit bunches by hydrothermal treatment processing and water leaching. Energy Procedia 75:584–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Khan AA, de Jong W, Jansens PJ, Spliethoff H (2009) Biomass combustion in fluidized bed boilers: potential problems and remedies. Fuel Process Technol 90(1):21–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yan M, Prabowo B, He L, Fang Z, Xu Z, Hu Y (2016) Effect of inorganic coagulant addition under hydrothermal treatment on the dewatering performance of excess sludge with various dewatering conditions. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 19(3):1279–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sheng C, Azevedo JLT (2005) Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data. Biomass Bioenergy 28(5):499–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Soponpongpipat N, Sittikul D, Sae-Ueng U (2015) Higher heating value prediction of torrefaction char produced from non-woody biomass. Front Energy 9(4):461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Liu Z, Quek A, Kent Hoekman S, Balasubramanian R (2013) Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel 103:943–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xiao LP, Shi ZJ, Xu F, Sun RC (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 118:619–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kongpanya J, Hussaro K, Teekasap S (2014) Influence of reaction temperature and reaction time on product from hydrothermal treatment of biomass residue. Am J Environ Sci 10(4):324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Anis S, Zainal ZA (2011) Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(5):2355–2377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Han J, Kim H (2008) The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12(2):397–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Darmawan A, Budianto D, Aziz M, Tokimatsu K (2017) Hydrothermally-treated empty fruit bunch cofiring in coal power plants: a techno-economic assessment. Energy Procedia 105:297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Deng L, Ye J, Jin X, Che D (2018) Transformation and release of potassium during fixed-bed pyrolysis of biomass. J Energy Inst 91:630–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Funke A, Ziegler F (2010) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4(2):160–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yan W, Hastings JT, Acharjee TC, Coronella CJ, Vásquez VR (2010) Mass and energy balances of wet torrefaction of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuel 24(9):4738–4742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nurdiawati A, Novianti S, Zaini IN, Nakhshinieva B, Sumida H, Takahashi F, Yoshikawa K (2015) Evaluation of hydrothermal treatment of empty fruit bunch for solid fuel and liquid organic fertilizer co-production. Energy Procedia 79:226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Blazsó M, Jakab E, Vargha A, Székely T, Zoebel H, Klare H, Keil G (1986) The effect of hydrothermal treatment on a Merseburg lignite. Fuel 65(3):337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Titirici M-M, Thomas A, Antonietti M (2007) Back in the black: hydrothermal carbonization of plant material as an efficient chemical process to treat the CO2 problem? New J Chem 31(6):787–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86(12–13):1781–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ibbett R, Gaddipati S, Davies S, Hill S, Tucker G (2011) The mechanisms of hydrothermal deconstruction of lignocellulose: new insights from thermal–analytical and complementary studies. Bioresour Technol 102(19):9272–9278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lavoie J-M, Baré W, Bilodeau M (2011) Depolymerization of steam-treated lignin for the production of green chemicals. Bioresour Technol 102(7):4917–4920

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Ekkachai Kanchanatip for his assistance in English writing.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. LY17E060005), State International Cooperation Project (Grant No. 2017YFE0107600), and World Class University Program—Institut Teknologi Bandung 2016. The authors also acknowledged to Indonesian Palm Oil Estate Fund for financial support through Research Project on Production of Clean Bio-synthesis Gas and DME Synthesis.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herri Susanto.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, M., Hantoko, D., Susanto, H. et al. Hydrothermal treatment of empty fruit bunch and its pyrolysis characteristics. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 9, 709–717 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00382-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hydrothermal treatment
  • Empty fruit bunch
  • Fuel characteristic
  • Potassium
  • Pyrolysis