Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of storage under different conditions on the fuel properties of biodiesel admixtures derived from waste frying and canola oils

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of storage conditions on the properties of transesterified methyl ester using waste frying (WFME) and waste canola (WCME) and their blends. Biodiesel samples were stored for 24 months at ambient temperature and also at 40 °C, and properties including oxidative stability, acid value, flash point, kinematic viscosity, density, cloud point (CP), and pour point (PP) were periodically measured. The variation of kinematic viscosity and density within a range temperature of − 10 to 300 °C were examined during the storage periods. The analysis showed that both viscosity and density increase because of the increase in the concentration of WFME in the blend, and both of them decrease as temperature increases. It is found that blending WCME with WFME has a significant improvement on the cold flow properties of WFME. Furthermore, oxidative stability and flash point were significantly reduced upon extended storage whereas acid value, kinematic viscosity, and density were increased by only small increments. Moreover, the CP and PP of blends were also affected by extended storage when the WCME concentration in those mixtures was under 35% by volume. In this work, 19 general correlations were presented for estimating kinematic viscosity, density, CP, and PP of the blends at several temperatures. These correlations depend on the temperature, volume fraction of WFME, storage temperature, and storage periods. The estimated values of biodiesel properties are in good agreement with the experimental data of this study and literature. The developed equations could be used as universal formulas to predict the biodiesel properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atapour M, Kariminia H, Moslehabadi PM (2014) Optimization of biodiesel production by alkali-catalyzed transesterification of used frying oil. Process Saf Environ Prot 92(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2012.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kassem Y (2017) An experimental and numerical investigation of some thermophysical properties of waste vegetable oil biodiesel at various temperatures (Doctoral dissertation, Near East University, Cyprus)

  3. Chen H, Xie B, Ma J, Chen Y (2018) NOx emission of biodiesel compared to diesel: higher or lower? Appl Therm Eng 137:584–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fawaz EG, Salam DA (2018) Preliminary economic assessment of the use of waste frying oils for biodiesel production in Beirut, Lebanon. Sci Total Environ 637-638:1230–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Filho SC, Miranda AC, Silva TA, Calarge FA, Souza RR, Santana JC, Tambourgi EB (2018) Environmental and techno-economic considerations on biodiesel production from waste frying oil in São Paulo city. J Clean Prod 183:1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Živković S, Veljković M, Banković-Ilić I, Krstić I, Konstantinović S, Ilić S et al (2017) Technological, technical, economic, environmental, social, human healthrisk, toxicological and policy considerations of biodiesel production and use. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:222–247. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moradi GR, Karami B, Mohadesi M (2013) Densities and kinematic viscosities in biodiesel–diesel blends at various temperatures. J Chem Eng Data 58(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1021/je3008843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghurri A, Kim J, Kim HG, Jung J, Song K (2012) The effect of injection pressure and fuel viscosity on the spray characteristics of biodiesel blends injected into an atmospheric chamber. J Mech Sci Technol 26(9):2941–2947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0703-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dwivedi G, Sharma MP (2014) Investigation and improvement in cold flow properties of pongamia biodiesel. Waste Biomass Valor 6(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-014-9330-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chastek TQ (2011) Improving cold flow properties of canola-based biodiesel. Biomass Bioenergy 35(1):600–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. González Gómez M, Howard-Hildige R, Leahy J, Rice B (2002) Winterisation of waste cooking oil methyl ester to improve cold temperature fuel properties. Fuel 81(1):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-2361(01)00117-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu J, Turn SQ, Takushi BM, Kawamata CL (2016) Storage and oxidation stabilities of biodiesel derived from waste cooking oil. Fuel 167:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanca A, Temur H (2016) The effects of long-term storage on the cold flow properties and viscosity of canola-based biodiesel. Energy Sources Part A 38(15):2205–2210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2015.1047066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pölczmann G, Tóth O, Beck Á, Hancsók J (2016) Investigation of storage stability of diesel fuels containing biodiesel produced from waste cooking oil. J Clean Prod 111:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Behzadi S, Farid MM (2007) Review: examining the use of different feedstock for the production of biodiesel. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 2(5):480–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kassem Y, Çamur H (2016) A Laboratory study of the effects of wide range temperature on the properties of biodiesel produced from various waste vegetable oils. Waste Biomass Valor 8(6):1995–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9753-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabudak T, Yildiz M (2010) Biodiesel production from waste frying oils and its quality control. Waste Manag 30(5):799–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Phan AN, Phan TM (2008) Biodiesel production from waste cooking oils. Fuel 87(17–18):3490–3496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. EN ISO 5508 (1990) Animal and vegetable fats and oils—analysis by gas chromatography of methyl esters of fatty acids

  20. Vicente G, Martı́nez M, Aracil J (2004) Integrated biodiesel production: a comparison of different homogeneous catalysts systems. Bioresour Technol 92(3):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM D 445 – 09 (2009) Standard test method for kinematic viscosity of transparent and opaque liquids (and calculation of dynamic viscosity)

  22. ASTM D854 - 14 (2014) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer

  23. ASTM D2500 - 17a (2017) Standard test method for cloud point of petroleum products. ASTM, West Conshohocken

  24. ASTM D97 - 17b (2017) Standard test method for pour point of petroleum products. West Conshohocken

  25. EN 14112 (2003) Fat and oil derivatives. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). Determination of oxidation stability (accelerated oxidation test)

  26. ASTM D664-17a (2017) Standard test method for acid number of petroleum products by potentiometric titration

  27. ASTM D93 - 16a (2016) Standard test methods for flash point by Pensky-Martens closed cup tester

  28. Ramírez-Verduzco LF, García-Flores BE, Rodríguez-Rodríguez JE, Del Rayo Jaramillo-Jacob A (2011) Prediction of the density and viscosity in biodiesel blends at various temperatures. Fuel 90(5):1751–1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.12.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Geacai S, Iulian O, Nita I (2015) Measurement, correlation and prediction of biodiesel blends viscosity. Fuel 143:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Alptekin E, Canakci M (2008) Determination of the density and the viscosities of biodiesel–diesel fuel blends. Renew Energy 33(12):2623–2630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodenbush CM, Hsieh FH, Viswanath DS (1999) Density and viscosity of vegetable oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 76(12):1415–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-999-0177-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tesfa B, Mishra R, Gu F, Powles N (2010) Prediction models for density and viscosity of biodiesel and their effects on fuel supply system in CI engines. Renew Energy 35(12):2752–2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mejía J, Salgado N, Orrego C (2013) Effect of blends of diesel and palm-castor biodiesels on viscosity, cloud point and flash point. Ind Crop Prod 43:791–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brown TL, Bursten BE, Hill JC, LeMay HE (2012) Chemistry: the central science. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  35. Marques RV, Duval EH, Corrêa LB, Corrêa ÉK (2015) Increase of unsaturated fatty acids (low melting point) of broiler fatty waste obtained through Staphylococcus xylosus fermentation. Curr Microbiol 71(5):601–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-015-0890-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Freitas SV, Pratas MJ, Ceriani R, Lima AS, Coutinho JA (2011) Evaluation of predictive models for the viscosity of biodiesel. Energy Fuel 25(1):352–358. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101299d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Selim MY, Ghannam MT, Aldajah S, Saleh HE (2015) The effect of temperature and mixing on the density and viscosity of jojoba-diesel fuels. Energy Sources Part A 37(16):1774–1781. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2011.644392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zakaria H, Khalid A, Sies MF, Mustaffa N, Manshoor B (2013) Effect of storage temperature and storage duration on biodiesel properties and characteristics. Appl Mech Mater 465-466:316–321. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.465-466.316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C, Ceniceros E, Natarajan M (2012) Review of biodiesel composition, properties, and specifications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(1):143–169. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dwivedi G, Sharma MP (2015) Investigation of cold flow properties of waste cooking biodiesel. Journal of Clean Energy Technologies 4(3):205–208. https://doi.org/10.7763/jocet.2016.v4.281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Moser BR (2010) Biodiesel production, properties, and feedstocks. Biofuels 285–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7145-6_15

    Google Scholar 

  42. Knothe G (2009) Improving biodiesel fuel properties by modifying fatty ester composition. Energy Environ Sci 2(7):759. https://doi.org/10.1039/b903941d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Serqueira D, Fernandes D, Cunha R, Squissato A, Santos D, Richter E, Munoz R (2014) Influence of blending soybean, sunflower, colza, corn, cottonseed, and residual cooking oil methyl biodiesels on the oxidation stability. Fuel 118:16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ashraful AM, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA, Rahman SM, Habibullah M, Syazwan M (2014) Study of the effect of storage time on the oxidation and thermal stability of various biodiesels and their blends. Energy Fuel 28(2):1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef402411v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kumar N (2017) Oxidative stability of biodiesel: causes, effects and prevention. Fuel 190:328–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ferrari B, Pighinelli A, Park K (2011) Biodiesel production and quality. In Biofuel's Engineering Process Technology. InTech

  47. Moser BR (2011) Influence of extended storage on fuel properties of methyl esters prepared from canola, palm, soybean and sunflower oils. Renew Energy 36(4):1221–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shahabuddin M, Kalam M, Masjuki H, Bhuiya M, Mofijur M (2012) An experimental investigation into biodiesel stability by means of oxidation and property determination. Energy 44(1):616–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mofijur M, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA, Atabani AE, Shahabuddin M, Palash SM, Hazrat MA (2013) Effect of biodiesel from various feedstocks on combustion characteristics, engine durability and materials compatibility: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 28:441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gülüm M, Bilgin A (2016) Two-term power models for estimating kinematic viscosities of different biodiesel-diesel fuel blends. Fuel Process Technol 149:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Engineering especially the Mechanical Engineering Department at Near East University for their support and encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youssef Kassem.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kassem, Y., Çamur, H. Effects of storage under different conditions on the fuel properties of biodiesel admixtures derived from waste frying and canola oils. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 8, 825–845 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0339-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0339-1

Keywords

Navigation