Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An optimisation study on biomass delignification process using alkaline wash

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A statistical based study employing response surface method (RSM) was conducted to ascertain the optimum pretreatment conditions using an alkaline wash technique i.e. at different temperature, time and base concentration using Malaysian oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFB) as a model substrate. Strong acid-dilute acid hydrolysis and dietary fibre methods were used in order to determine structural carbohydrates and lignin content of pretreated EFB and analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Based on the RSM model, 17 runs of different pretreatment conditions were carried out. ANOVA analysis on the different techniques yielded an F value of 5.32 leading to the rejection of null hypothesis. As such, both techniques were determined to be statistically different. Response surface model with quadratic function was generated for biomass pretreatment using alkaline wash which has indicated that sodium hydroxide concentration is the most important factor in determining lignin removal, followed by time of reaction. The final lignin content of pretreated biomass shall be 9.04 wt.% which is 62.7% of lignin removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fernando S, Adhikari S, Chandrapal C, Murali N (2006) Biorefineries: current status, challenges and future direction. Energy Fuel 20:1727–1737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia-Nunez JA, Ramirez-Contreras NE, Rodriguez DT, Silva-Lora E, Frear CS, Stockle C, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Evolution of palm oil mills into bio-refineries: literature review on current and potential use of residual biomass and effluents. Resour Conser Recycling 110:99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Esposito D, Antonietti M (2015) Redefining biorefinery: the search for unconventional building blocks. Chem Soc Rev 44:5821–5835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2009) Methods for lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:3713–3729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Awalludin MF, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, Wan Nadhari WNA (2015) An overview of the oil palm industry in Malaysia and its waste utilization through thermochemical conversion, specifically via liquefaction. Renew Sus Energy Rev 50:1469–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abnisa F, Daud WMAW, Husin W, Sahu JN (2011) Utilization possibilities of palm shell as a source of biomass energy in Malaysia by producing bio-oil in pyrolysis process. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1863–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goh CS, Tan KT, Lee KT (2010) Bio-ethanol from lignocellulose: status, perspective and challenges in Malaysia. Bioresour. Tech. 101:4834–4841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karim RA, Hussain AS, Zain AM (2014) Production of bioethanol from empty fruit bunches cellulosic biomass and Avicel PH-101 cellulose. Biomass Conv Bioref 4:333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katahira R, Mittal A, McKinney K, Chen X, Tucker MP, Johnson DK, Beckham GT (2016) Base catalysed depolymerisation of biorefinery lignin. ACS Sustainable Chem & Eng 4:1474–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts VM, Stein V, Reiner T, Lemonidou A, Li X, Lercher JA (2011) Towards quantitative catalytic lignin depolymerisation. Chem Eur Jour 17:5939–5948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dabral S, Mottweiler J, Rinesch T, Bolm C (2015) Base-catalysed cleavage of lignin β-O-4 model compounds in dimethyl carbonate. Green Chem 17:4908–4912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu C, Arancon RAD, Labidi J, Luque R (2014) Lignin: depolymerisation strategies: towards valuable chemicals and fuels. Chem Soc Rev 43(22):7485–7500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Tucker M, Ji Y (2013) Recent development in chemical depolymerisation of lignin: a review. Jour Appl Chem. doi:10.1155/2013/838645

    Google Scholar 

  14. ASTM International, ASTM E1690 Standard method for determination of ethanol extractives in biomass (2016)

  15. Goering HK and PJ Van Soest (1970) Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Handbook. No. 379. Washington, DC

  16. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaves AV, Waghorn GC, Tavendale MH (2002) A simplified method for lignin measurement in a range of forage species. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 64:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sluiter, A. Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., D. Templeton and D. Crocker (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Laboratory Analytical Procedure. NREL/TP-510-42618

  19. Medina JDC, Woiciechowski A, Filho AZ, Noseda MD, Kaur BS, Soccol CR (2015) Lignin preparation from oil palm empty fruit bunches by sequential acid/alkaline treatment—a biorefinery approach. Bioresour. Tech. 194:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chiesa S, Gnansounou E (2014) Use of empty fruit bunches from the oil palm for bioethanol production: a thorough comparison between dilute acid and dilute alkali pretreatment. Bioresour Tech 159:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nieves DC, Karimi K, Horvath IS (2011) Improvement of biogas production from oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB). Ind Crops Prods 34:1097–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Isroi, Mofoluwake MI, Ria M, Siti S, Muhammad NC, Claes N, Taherzadeh MJ (2012) Structural changes of oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) after fungal and phosphoric acid pretreatment. Molecules 17:14995–15012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdullah N, Sulaiman F, Gerhauser H (2011) Characterisation of oil palm empty fruit bunches for fuel application. Jour Phy Sci 20:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  24. Financie R, Moniruzzaman M, Uemura Y (2016) Enhanced enzymatic delignification of oil palm biomass with ionic liquid pretreatment. BioChem Eng Jour 110:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdul PM, Jahim JM, Harun S, Markom M, Lutpi NA, Hassan O, Balan V, Dale BE, Mohd. Nor MT (2016) Effects of changes in chemical and structural characteristic of ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreated oil palm empty fruit bunch fibre on enzymatic saccharification and fermentability for biohydrogen. Bioresource Tech 211:200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Taherzadeh MI, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Intl Jour Mol Sci 9:1621–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mirahmadi K, Kabir MM, Jeihanipour A, Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ (2010) Alkaline pretreatment of spruce and birch to improve bioethanol and biogas production. Bioresources 5(2):928–938

    Google Scholar 

  28. Myers RH, Montomery DC (2009) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 317–321

    Google Scholar 

  29. Khuri AI, Mukhopadhyay S (2010) Response surface methodology. WIREs Computational Statistics:128–149

  30. Bas D, Boyaci IH (2007) Modelling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng 78(3):836–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76:965–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Whitcomb, P. J., Larntz, K., (1992) The role of pure error on normal probability plots, presented at Transactions of the 46th Annual Quality Congress, Milwaukee

  33. Akhtar J, Teo CL, Lai LW, Hassan N, Idris A, Aziz RA (2015) Factors affecting delignification of oil palm empty fruit bunch by microwave-assisted dilute acid/alkali pretreatment. Bioresources 10(1):588–596

    Google Scholar 

  34. Muryanto, Eka T, Haznan A, Agung. C, Effendi TC, Yanni S (2015) Alkaline delignification of oil palm empty fruit bunch using black liquor from pretreatment. Procedia Chemistry 16:99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hong JY, Kim YS, Oh KK (2013) Fractionation and delignification of empty fruit bunches with low reaction severity for high sugar recovery. Bioresour Technol 146:176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Choi, W. I., Park, J. Y., Lee, J. P., Oh, Y. K., Park, Y. C., Kim, J. S., Park, J. M., Kim, C. H., Lee, J. S. (2013) Optimization of NaOH-catalyzed steam pretreatment of empty fruit bunch, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 6 (170)

  37. Hamisan AF, Aziz SA, Kamaruddin K, Md Shah UK, Shahab N, Hassan MA (2009) Delignification of oil palm empty fruit bunch using chemical and microbial pretreatment methods. Int J of Agricultural Research 4(8):250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge PETRONAS and PETRONAS Chemical Group Bhd. (PCGB) for funding this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azlan Shah Hussain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zawawi, A., Gaik, L.P., Sebran, N.H. et al. An optimisation study on biomass delignification process using alkaline wash. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 8, 59–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0246-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0246-x

Keywords

Navigation