Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 85–94 | Cite as

Influence of ethylene on the formation of mixed alcohols over a MoS2 catalyst using biomass-derived synthesis gas

  • G. WeberEmail author
  • R. Rauch
  • H. Hofbauer
Original Article


Since 2011, a pilot plant for the production of mixed alcohols (MAs) from biomass-derived synthesis gas has been in operation. The pilot plant uses synthesis gas provided by a biomass-based combined heat and power plant (CHP) in Güssing, in which the fixed bed reactor is filled with a sulfidized molybdenum catalyst (MoS2). The advantage of a sulfidized catalyst is resistance to sulfur components. Sulfur resistance significantly lowers the operating costs of such a plant. The main parts of the mixed alcohol synthesis plant in Güssing are a steam reforming unit, a glycol scrubber, a compression step, a fixed bed reactor for the synthesis itself, a condensation vessel for the separation of alcohols from the gas stream, and an expansion valve. The main aim of this project in the last year was to perform parameter variation to investigate the optimal operation point of the plant and to use these parameters to conduct long-time trials over several days. Parameter variation showed the impact of reaction temperature, pressure, and space velocity on product yield and distribution. The influence of the gas composition on the product distribution and side products was also investigated. This study was dedicated to investigating the influence of the ethylene content in the synthesis gas on the formation of propanol and ethyl mercaptan (C2H6S). During the experiments, several liters of MAs were produced. The alcohols consisted mainly of alcohols from carbon numbers between one and three. One of the main results of the first experiments was that the ethylene content in the synthesis gas has a high impact on the product distribution and is also responsible for side reactions to sulfur components.


Biomass gasification Biomass to liquid Mixed alcohol synthesis Sulfidized molybdenum catalyst Sulfur species 



This work was supported by our corporate partners Abengoa Bioenergía Nuevas Tecnologías, Albemarle, Biomassekraftwerk Güssing GmbH, Mondi, and Repotec Umwelttechnik GmbH. Furthermore, the investigations were carried out within the COMET funding competence center program and the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund.


  1. 1.
    Qiu S, Huang W, Xu Y, Liu L, Li Q (2011) Production of mixed alcohols from bio-syngas over Mo-based catalyst. Chin J Chem Phys 24:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Subramani V, Gangwal SK (2008) A review of recent literature to search for an efficient catalytic process for the conversion of syngas to ethanol. Energy Fuel 22:814–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolhàr-Nordenkamp M, Rauch R, Bosch K, Aichernig C, Hofbauer H (2002) Biomass CHP Plant Güssing—using gasification for power generation. Institute of Chemical Engineering Vienna University of Technology.p. 1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stutterecker W (2005) Construction and startup of a slurry Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Master Thesis Energy- and Environmental Management Degree Program University of Applied Science Burgenland. p. 2–5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rauch R, Hofbauer H (2003) Dual fluidized bed steam gasification in the plant Güssing. 9th International Conference of Energetic Utilization of Renewable Sources. p. 2–5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rauch R (2012) CHP-Plant Güssing in handbook of biomass gasification second edition. BTG Biomass Technology Group BVGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mei D, Rousseau R, Kathmann SM, Glezakou VA, Engelhard MH, Jiang W, Wang C, Gerber MA, White JF, Stevens DJ (2010) Ethanol synthesis from syngas over Rh-Based/SiO2 catalysts: a combined experimental and theoretical modelling study. J Catal 271:325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van der Lee G, Schuller B, Post H, Favre TLF, Ponec V (1986) On the selectivity of Rh catalysts in the formation of oxygenates. J Catal 98:522–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herman R (1991) Classical and non-classical routes for alcohols synthesis. New trends in co activation, vol 7. Elsevier, New York, pp 265–349Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibsen K (2006) Equipment design and cost estimation for small modular biomass systems, synthesis gas cleanup, and oxygen separation equipment. Task 9: Mixed Alcohols From Syngas – State of Technology. NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). NREL/SR-510-39947Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bradford MCJ, Konduru MV, Fuentes DX (2003) Preparation, characterization and application of Cr2O3/ZnO catalysts for methanol synthesis. Fuel Process Technol 83:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta M, Spivey JJ (2009) Electrodeposited Cu-ZnO and Mn-Cu-ZnO nanowire/tube catalysts for higher alcohols from syngas. Catal Today 147:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toyoda T, Minami T, Qian EW (2013) Mixed alcohol synthesis over sulfided molybdenum-based catalysts. Energy Fuel 27:3769–3777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park TY, Nam I, Kim YG (1997) Kinetic analysis of mixed alcohols synthesis from syngas over K/MoS2 catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:5246–5257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiading X, Doesburg EBM, Scholten JJF (1987) Synthesis of higher alcohols from syngas—recently patented catalysts and tentative ideas on the mechanism. Catal Today 2:125–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christensen JM, Mortensen PM, Trane R, Jensen PA, Jensen AD (2009) Effects of H2S and process conditions in the synthesis of mixed alcohols from syngas over alkali promoted cobalt-molybdenum sulfide. Appl Catal A Gen 366:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ashrafi M, Pfeifer C, Pröll T, Hofbauer H (2008) Experimental study of model biogas catalytic steam reforming: 2. Impact of sulfur on the deactivation and regeneration of Ni-based catalysts. Energy Fuel 22:4190–4195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tatsumi T, Muramatsu A, Yokota K, Tominaga H (1989) Mechanistic study on the alcohol synthesis over molybdenum catalysts. J Catal 115:388–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vit Z, Portefaix JL, Breysse M (1994) Hydroformylation of ethylene over cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, CoMo and NiMo alumina supported sulfide catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 116:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gutierrez OY, Kaufmann C, Hrabar A, Zhu Y, Lercher JA (2011) Synthesis of methyl mercaptan from carbonyl sulfide over sulfide K2MoO4/SiO2. J Catal 280:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioenergy 2020+ GmbHGüssingAustria
  2. 2.Institute of Chemical EngineeringVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations