In many countries, concerns have been raised regarding the lack of participation of students in mathematics at the university level due to a dearth of skilled professionals to meet the needs of an increasingly technological, and thus mathematical, world. In this article, we report findings from a study in which we compared the experiences of first-year and final-year undergraduate students studying in the mathematics departments at two Australian universities. We focus on the participants’ conceptions of the supports and challenges that they experienced in the mathematics departments, using a multimodal data collection method, photovoice. We found key differences between first-year and final-year participants’ perceptions of the learning environment when considering gender-related differences, such as an increasingly lower participation of women in mathematics and differential treatment by gender. Participants reported feeling supported by peers, at both year levels, and faculty members, particularly in first year. Participants from both year levels valued the collaborative learning environment of the classes and technological learning supports (e.g. lecture recordings) but raised concerns about the format and weighting of assessments. Although there were some year level differences, there were also commonalities to the participants’ experiences, which indicates that some issues may be systemic. The knowledge that is gained from this research is crucial in understanding students’ lived experiences and thus making suggestions to address university mathematics pipeline issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Although we conceptualize gender as a socially constructed spectrum, the studies that we report regarding gender issues in university-level mathematics all focused on women and men, rather than considering non-binary students. It is unclear how the gendered nature of mathematics impacts non-binary students, but, as another minority gender group in university mathematics, non-binary students may have some similar experiences to women students.
Association for Women in Science. (n.d.). Attention men: how to be an ally. Retrieved from https://www.awis.org/wp-content/uploads/Be-an-Ally-AWIS.pdf
Australian Academy of Science. (2016). The mathematical sciences in Australia: A vision for 2025. Retrieved from www.science.org.au/mathematics-plan-2016-25
Australian Government Department of Industry, Innovation and Science. (2015). National innovation and science agenda report. Retrieved from https://www.industry.gov.au/national-innovation-and-science-agenda-report
Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. (2017). Discipline profile of the mathematical sciences 2017. Retrieved from http://amsi.org.au/publications/discipline-profile-mathematical-sciences-2017/
Barthelemy, R. S., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020119.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559 Retrieved from http://tqr.nova.edu/.
Bergsten, C. (2007). Investigating quality of undergraduate mathematics lectures. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217462.
Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 152–127. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670149.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theories and methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Bryant, S., & Alvarado, A. (2017). A mathematician’s journey from mentee to mentor: reflections on the EDGE program. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 7(2), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201702.21.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1999). Subjects of sex/gender/desire. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 340–358). London: Routledge.
Chao, T. P.-L. (2012). Looking within: mathematics teacher identity using photo-elicitation/photovoice (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Austin: University of Texas Austin.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007013.
Cook, K., & Quigley, C. (2013). Connecting to our community: utilizing photovoice as a pedagogical tool to connect college students to science. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2013.205a.
Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: the role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730. https://doi.org/10.1086/321299.
Coupland, M., Dunn, P. K., Galligan, L., Oates, G., & Trenholm, S. (2016). Tertiary mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 187–211). Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Sydney: Pearson.
Damarin, S. K. (2000). The mathematically able as a marked category. Gender and Education, 12(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250020418.
Damarin, S. K., & Erchick, D. B. (2010). Toward clarifying the meanings of gender in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 310–323 Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/publications/journal-for-research-in-mathematics-education/.
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(23), 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114.
Deshler, J., Fuller, E., & Darrah, M. (2019). Affective states of university developmental mathematics students and their impact on self-efficacy, belonging, career identity, success and persistence. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00096-3.
Ellis, E., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM after calculus compared to men: lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS One, 11(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Fenwick-Sehl, L., Fioroni, M., & Lovric, M. (2009). Recruitment and retention of mathematics students in Canadian universities. Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802568192.
Forgasz, H., & Leder, G. (2019). VCE STEM enrolments in co-educational and single-sex schools. Mathematics Education Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00271-4.
Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Preface. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed., pp. ix–xii). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gill, K. (2000). Young women’s decision to pursue non-traditional science: intrapersonal, interpersonal and contextual influences (unpublished master’s thesis). Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
Githua, B. N., & Mwangi, J. G. (2003). Students’ mathematics self-concept and motivation to learn mathematics: relationship and gender differences among Kenya’s secondary-school students in Nairobi and Rift Valley provinces. International Journal of Educational Development, 23(5), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(03)00025-7.
Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 197–218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hall, J. (2010). The influence of high school and university experiences on women’s pursuit of undergraduate mathematics degrees in Canada. In H. Forgasz, J. R. Becker, K. Lee, & O. B. Steinthorsdottir (Eds.), International perspectives on gender and mathematics education (pp. 365–390). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Hall, J. (2012). Gender issues in mathematics: an Ontario perspective. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v8i1.3004.
Hall, J., & Suurtamm, C. (2018). Behind the “success story”: exploring the experiences of a woman mathematics major. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(4), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0032-1.
Harkness, S. S., & Stallworth, J. (2013). Photovoice: understanding high school females’ conceptions of mathematics and learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9485-3.
Hernandez-Martinez, P., Williams, J., Black, L., Davis, P., Pampaka, M., & Wake, G. (2011). Students’ views on their transition from school to college mathematics: rethinking ‘transition’ as an issue of identity. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.585824.
Herrmann, S. D., Adelman, R. M., Bodford, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2016). The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in STEM courses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38(5), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1209757.
Herzig, A. H. (2004). ‘Slaughtering this beautiful math’: graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics. Gender and Education, 16(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250042000251506.
Ho, F., & Mussap, A. J. (2019). The gender identity scale: adapting the Gender Unicorn to measure gender identity. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 6(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000322.
Jablonka, E., Ashjari, H., & Bergsten, C. (2017). “Much palaver about greater than zero and such stuff” – first year engineering students’ recognition of university mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 69–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0037-y.
Johnston, P. (2015). Higher degrees and honours bachelor degrees in mathematics and statistics completed in Australia in 2014. Gazette of the Australian Mathematical Society, 5, 290–296 Retrieved from http://www.austms.org.au/gazette.
Jouini, E., Karehnke, P., & Napp, C. (2018). Stereotypes, underconfidence and decision-making with an application to gender and math. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 148, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.002.
King, D., Cattlin, J., & Ward, J. (2015). Building leadership capacity in university first year learning and teaching in the mathematical sciences. Retrieved from https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/130076/LE12_2190_King_report_2015%20final%20published.pdf?sequence=1
Kosiol, T., Rach, S., & Ufer, S. (2018). (Which) mathematics interest is important for a successful transition to a university study program? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1359–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9925-8.
Laursen, S. L., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00085-6.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Perez, T., Barger, M. M., Wormington, S. V., Godin, E., Snyder, K. E., Robinson, K., Sarkar, A., Richman, L. S., & Schwartz-Bloom, R. (2018). Repairing the leaky pipeline: a motivationally supportive intervention to enhance persistence in undergraduate science pathways. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.03.001.
Mastekaasa, A., & Smeby, J.-C. (2008). Educational choice and persistence in male- and female-dominated fields. Higher Education, 55(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9042-4.
Nadal, K. L. (2010). Gender microaggressions: implications for mental health. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Feminism and women’s rights worldwide, volume 2: mental and physical health (pp. 155–175). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Piatek-Jimenez, K. (2015). On the persistence and attrition of women in mathematics. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 5(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201501.03.
Pryzgoda, J., & Chrisler, J. C. (2000). Definitions of gender and sex: the subtleties of meaning. Sex Roles, 43(7–8), 553–569 Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/journal/11199.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2014). Analyzing media messages: using quantitative content analysis in research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Robnett, R. (2013). The role of peer support for girls and women in the STEM pipeline: implications for identity and anticipated retention. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 232–253 Retrieved from http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/index.
Robnett, R. (2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315596162.
Rodd, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2006). Invisible and special: young women’s experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education, 18(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500195093.
Sax, L. J., Kanny, M. A., Riggers-Piehl, T. A., Whang, H., & Paulson, L. N. (2015). “But I'm not good at math”: the changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56(4), 299–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x.
Secolsky, C., & Denison, D. B. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook on measurement, assessment, and evaluation in higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). Students’ intentions to study non-compulsory mathematics: the importance of how good you think you are. British Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 462–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3150.
Simon, R. A., Aulls, M. W., Dedic, H., Hubbard, K., & Hall, N. C. (2015). Exploring student persistence in STEM programs: a motivational model. Canadian Journal of Education, 38(1), 1–27 Retrieved from https://cje-rce.ca/.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Steele, D. F., Levin, A. K., Blecksmith, R., & Shahverdian, J. (2005). The calculus of differences: effects of a psychosocial, cultural, and pedagogical intervention in an all women’s university calculus class. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217420.
Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions and marginality: manifestation, dynamics, and impact. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Sue, D. W., & Capodilupo, C. M. (2008). Racial, gender, and sexual orientation microaggressions: implications for counseling and psychotherapy. In D. W. Sue & D. Sue (Eds.), Counseling the culturally diverse: theory and practice (5th ed., pp. 105–130). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Suurtamm, C., Thompson, D. R., Kim, R. Y., Moreno, L. D., Sayac, N., Schukajlow, S., Silver, E., Ufer, S., & Vos, P. (2016). Assessment in mathematics education: large-scale and classroom assessment. Cham: Springer International.
Tan, S. F., & Lim, C. S. (2010). Effective mathematics lesson from the lenses of primary pupils: preliminary analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.033.
Thoma, A., & Nardi, E. (2018). Transition from school to university mathematics: manifestations of unresolved commognitive conflict in first year students’ examination scripts. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0064-3.
Trusty, J. (2002). Effects of high school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics college majors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80(4), 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00213.x.
Wade, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2017). Instructional experiences that align with conceptual understanding in the transition from high school mathematics to college calculus. American Secondary Education, 45(2), 4–21 Retrieved from https://www.ashland.edu/coe/about-college/american-secondary-education-journal.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309.
Ward-Penny, R., Johnston-Wilder, S., & Lee, C. (2011). Exit interviews: undergraduates who leave mathematics behind. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/41319562.
Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S., & Durik, A. M. (2006). The leaky mathematics pipeline for girls: a motivational analysis of high school enrolments in Australia and the USA. Equal Opportunities International, 25(8), 642–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150610719119.
Whitfield, D., & Meyer, H. (2005). Learning from our students: photovoice and classroom action research. The Science Education Review, 4(4), 97–103 Retrieved from http://www.scienceeducationreview.com/.
Wilkinson, J., Major, J., Santoro, N., & Langat, K. (2012). What out-of-school resources and practices facilitate African refugee students’ educational success in Australian rural and regional settings? Retrieved from http://www.csu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/221155/African-Refugee-students-in-Australia.pdf
Wood, L., & Solomonides, I. (2008). Different disciplines, different traditions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 117–134 Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/journal/13394.
Wood, L. N., Joyce, S., Petocz, P., & Rodd, M. (2007). Learning in lectures: multiple representations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(7), 907–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701561496.
Yang, Y., & Carroll, D. W. (2018). Gendered microaggressions in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Leadership and Research in Education, 4, 28–45 Retrieved from https://education-human-services.wright.edu/leadership-studies-in-education-and-organizations/ohio-council-of-professors-of-educational-administration/leadership-and-research-in-education.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, J., Robinson, T., Flegg, J. et al. First-year and final-year undergraduate students’ perceptions of university mathematics departments. Math Ed Res J 34, 189–214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00340-z
- University-level mathematics
- Pipeline issues
- Gender issues
- Student experience