School leaders employ various school-based actions to influence students’ subject enrolments at senior secondary levels (Years 11 and 12), which in turn affect students’ entrance into tertiary courses and career choices. In the context of reported declines in the proportion of students opting to study higher-level mathematics, this qualitative study sought insights into seven Australian mathematics teacher leaders’ decision-making processes and actions in their particular school contexts. It aimed to relate their actions to particular attributions for enrolment declines and their goals for students’ learning and achievement. The leaders’ attributions included students’ lack of ability, changes in university courses’ pre-requisites, students’ lack of effort or persistence, and negative attitudes towards mathematics. The leaders described a variety of school-based actions; some school leaders had actually chosen opposing actions but expressed similar reasons for implementing them, and vice versa. Tensions among external pragmatic constraints, the actions of other school staff, and the teacher leaders’ own goals for student learning in mathematics framed the findings of this study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2018). My School. Retrieved from https://www.myschool.edu.au/about/
Author (2017). Journal of mathematics teacher education.
Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage.
Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping – disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648.
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: what do we know? School Leadership and Management, 34(5), 553–571.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). National numeracy review report. Canberra, ACT: Human capital working group, Council of Australian Governments. Retrieved from https://alearningplace.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/National-Numeracy-Review.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48.
Dweck, C. S. (2007). Mindset the new psychology of success: how we can learn to fulfill our potential. New York: Ballantine Books.
Dweck, C. S. (2010). Mind-sets and equitable education. Principal Leadership, 10(5), 26–29.
Espinoza, P., Arêas da Luz Fontes, A. B., & Arms-Chavez, C. J. (2014). Attributional gender bias: teachers’ ability and effort explanations for students’ math performance. Social Psychology of Education, 17(1), 105–126.
Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 55–69.
Forgasz, H. (2010). Streaming for mathematics in years 7–10 in Victoria: an issue of equity? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(1), 57–90.
Gemici, S., Bednarz, A., Karmel, T., & Lim, P. (2014). The factors affecting the educational and occupational aspirations of young Australians, NCVER, Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www.lsay.edu.au/publications/2711.html.
Harris, K-L., & Jensz, F. (2006). The preparation of mathematics teachers in Australia: meeting the demand for suitably qualified mathematics teachers in secondary schools. Report prepared for the Australian Council of Deans of Science. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/disciplines/docs/Prep_Math_Teach_Aust.pdf
Ho, K. F. (2010). Year 11 advanced mathematics: Hearing from students who buck the trend. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 248–255. Fremantle, Australia: MERGA.
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449.
Jang, L. Y., & Liu, W. C. (2012). 2 × 2 Achievement goals and achievement emotions: a cluster analysis of students’ motivation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(1), 59–76.
Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46.
Lazarides, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2015). Girls' and boys' perceived mathematics teacher beliefs, classroom learning environments and mathematical career intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.005.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies, Melbourne, Vic. Retrieved from http://www.acola.org.au.
McCurry, D. (2013). Overview of senior assessment and tertiary entrance in Australia and other countries. Melbourne, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/qld_review/5/.
McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R. & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why not? Report prepared for the Department of Education, employment and workplace relations. Retrieved from http://www.aamt.edu.au/index.php/Activities-and-projects/ Previous-projects/Maths-Why-Not.
Middleton, J. A. (2013). More than motivation: the combined effects of critical motivational variables on middle school mathematics achievement. Middle Grades Research Journal, 8(1), 77–95.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Noyes, A., & Sealey, P. (2012). Investigating participation in advanced level mathematics: a study of student drop-out. Research Papers in Education, 27(1), 123–138.
Office of Chief Scientist, Australia. (2012). Mathematics, engineering, and science in the national interest. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/2012/05/mes-report/
Öqvist, A., & Malmström, M. (2017). What motivates students? A study on the effects of teacher leadership and students’ self-efficacy. International Journal of Leadership in Education., 21, 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1355480.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies policy report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/36645825.pdf
Plenty, S., & Heubeck, B. G. (2013). A multidimensional analysis of changes in mathematics motivation and engagement during high school. Educational Psychology, 33(1), 14–30.
Prieto, E., & Dugar, N. (2016). An enquiry into the influence of mathematics on students’ choice of STEM careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication., 15, 1501–1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9753-7.
Rolland, R. G. (2012). Synthesizing the evidence on classroom goal structures in middle and secondary schools: a meta-analysis and narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 396–435.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: a theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2013). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Higher Education.
Sullivan, P., Tobias, S., & McDonough, A. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 81–99.
Timms, M. J., Moyle, K., Weldon, P. R., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools: Literature and policy review. Policy Insights: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Victorican Curriculum and Assessment Authority (2018). ABC of scaling. Retrieved from http://www.vtac.edu.au/files/pdf/publications/abcofscaling.pdf.
Watt, H. M. G., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: a comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1594–1611.
Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 203–215.
Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: a history of ideas. Educational Pyschologist, 45(1), 28–36.
Wieman, C., & Welsh, A. (2016). The connection between teaching methods and attribution errors. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 645–648.
Wilson, P. H., Edgington, C., Sztajn, P., & DeCuir-Gunby, J. (2014). Teachers, attributions, and students’ mathematical work. In J.-J. Lo, K. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 115–132). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Zevenbergen, R. (2005). The construction of a mathematical habitus: implications of ability grouping in the middle years. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 607–619.
The authors would like to acknowledge with appreciation the teacher leader participants. Special thanks to Professor **** for her contribution to the data analysis.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mathematics leaders: interview schedule
Number of years teaching mathematics:
Number of years in leadership role (Head of Maths, Maths coordinator):
Have taught in: state government sector/independent sector/Catholic sector/other.
Role is: Years 7–12/Years 5–8/Years K–12/other
What is the current status of your school’s enrolments in Years 11 and 12 Mathematical Methods (MM) and Specialist Mathematics (SM)? How many students and classes do you have?
Who are the teachers teaching these students; what are their profiles? Are they experienced maths teachers with many years of experience, were they mathematics trained and/or majored in mathematics at tertiary level?
What have you noticed about your school’s enrolments in Years 11 and 12 Mathematical Methods (MM) and Specialist Mathematics (SM) over the past decade? Have they been decreasing/increasing/steady?
What reasons do you think are likely for this in your school?
Does your school have any school/department-based strategies for influencing students’ subject choices in mathematics at senior secondary level?
If yes, what are they? If not, can you please explain/say more about why not?
Do your mathematics teachers offer any career advice to students at Year 10 or earlier relating to careers requiring or using mathematics? Is it up to the individual teacher or is it part of the whole school/department approach?
Have there been any discussions of this issue of students’ enrolment of MM and SM in your school or department meetings? If yes, can you tell us more about the discussions?
If you could be granted three wishes for your school mathematics program relating to the students’ enrolment of mathematics at senior secondary level, what would they be?
Apparently over the past decade, there has been a significant decrease in the proportion of Victorian VCE students electing to study MM and SM. A similar national trend has been highlighted. What reasons do you think are likely for this trend? What do you think is the main reason?
a) From the literature, it was suggested that students’ mathematics experiences at junior secondary level played a part in their taking up mathematics at senior secondary levels. What do you think?
b) It was also suggested that due to the shortages of maths teachers, teachers who were not trained in mathematics had to teach junior secondary maths, and that might affect the students’ experiences with mathematics. What do you think?
c) Another factor highlighted in the literature is students’ attitudes and perceptions towards mathematics and its use in careers. What do you think? What do you think are the attitudes and perceptions of your students (for example Year 10 students) towards mathematics? Have you or your school looked at this affective aspect, such as promoting interest in mathematics in some way? If yes, please tell us more.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkie, K.J., Tan, H. Exploring mathematics teacher leaders’ attributions and actions in influencing senior secondary students’ mathematics subject enrolments. Math Ed Res J 31, 441–464 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00264-3
- Mathematics teacher leaders
- Senior secondary mathematics
- Subject selection
- Decision making