Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 421–440 | Cite as

Snapshots of mathematics teacher noticing during task design

Original Article

Abstract

Designing a mathematically worthwhile task is critical for promoting students’ reasoning. To improve task design skills, teachers often engage in collaborative lesson planning activities such as lesson study. However, to learn from the process of lesson study, it is important for teachers to notice productively the concepts, students’ confusion and the design of the task. But what researchers mean by productive noticing varies. In this article, I present the FOCUS Framework which highlights two characteristics of productive noticing: having an explicit focus for noticing and focusing noticing through pedagogical reasoning. Using these two characteristics, I develop snapshots of noticing as a representation of practice to present a fine-grained analysis of teacher noticing. Through vignettes of teachers discussing the design of a task to teach fractions, I illustrate how two teachers’ noticing can be analysed and represented using snapshots of noticing. To conclude, I highlight what snapshots of noticing tell us about a teacher’s noticing and suggest ways to use these snapshots in future studies of noticing.

Keywords

Mathematics teacher noticing Productive teaching practices Task design Representations of practice Fractions 

References

  1. Alston, A. S., Pedrick, L., Morris, K. P., & Basu, R. (2011). Lesson study as a tool for developing teachers’ close attention to students’ mathematical thinking. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: learning together (pp. 135–151). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Effective pedagogy in mathematics. Geneva: International Bureau of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D. L. (2011). Foreword. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. xx–xxiv). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. doi:10.1177/0022487109348479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breen, S., & O’Shea, A. (2010). Mathematical thinking and task design. Irish Mathematics Society Bulletin, 66, 39–49.Google Scholar
  10. Brodie, K. (2010). Mathematical reasoning through tasks: learners’ responses. In K. Brodie (Ed.), Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms (pp. 43–56). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Trans. N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield Eds.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Choy, B. H. (2013). Productive mathematical noticing: what it is and why it matters. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Proceedings of 36th annual conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 186–193). Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar
  14. Choy, B. H. (2014). Teachers’ productive mathematical noticing during lesson preparation. In C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 2, pp. 297–304). Vancouver, Canada: PME.Google Scholar
  15. Choy, B. H. (2015). The FOCUS framework: snapshots of mathematics teacher noticing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). New Zealand: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  16. Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In A. Kelly, R. Lesh, & J. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 68–95). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Cobb, P., & Whitenack, J. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom videorecordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(3), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doerr, H. M. (2006). Examining the tasks of teaching when using students’ mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 3–24. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-4437-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 171–185. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00102-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2012). Learning to notice students’ mathematical thinking through on-line discussions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 747–759. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0425-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Understanding teaching and classroom practice in mathematics. In J. Frank & K. Lester (Eds.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225–256). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldsmith, L. T., & Seago, N. (2011). Using classroom artifacts to focus teachers’ noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 169–187). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205. doi:10.3102/0002831207312906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematics tasks and student cognition: classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.Google Scholar
  28. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., Philipp, R. A., & Schappelle, B. P. (2011a). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 97–116). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Jacobs, V. R., Philipp, R. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2011). Preface. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. xxv - xxix). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591–646). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: a theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285–304. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9102-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li, Y., Chen, X., & Kulm, G. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ practices and thinking in lesson plan development: a case of teaching fraction division. ZDM, 41(6), 717–731. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0174-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: the discipline of noticing. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  36. Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: aeeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2006). Designing and using mathematical tasks. United Kingdom: Tarquin Publications.Google Scholar
  38. McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2010). Metaphor or met-before? The effects of previous experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 169–179. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pegg, J. (1989). Analyzing a mathematics lesson to provide a vehicle for improving teaching practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1(2), 18-33.Google Scholar
  40. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., and Philipp, R. A. (2011a). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, and R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 1-13). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., and Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011b). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., & Colestock, A. A. (2011c). Accessing mathematics teachers’ in-the-moment noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 79–94). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, M. S., Bill, V., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Thinking through a lesson: successfully implementing high-level tasks. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 14(3), 132–138.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: from research to practice. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 3(5), 344–350.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Star, J. R., Lynch, K., & Perova, N. (2011). Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ abilities to attend to classroom features. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107–125. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. doi:10.1080/10986060802229675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: an analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Stockero, S. L. (2014). Transitions in prospective mathematics teacher noticing. In J.-J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. V. Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 239–259). Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0752-x.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, M. O. J. (2006). Developing versatility in mathematical thinking. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Proceedings of Retirement as Process and Concept: a festshcrift for Eddie Gray and David Tall (pp. 223–241). Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar
  55. van Es, E. (2011). A framework for learning to notice students’ thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Vondrová, N., & Žalská, J. (2013). Paper presented at the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Mathematics for teaching and pre-service mathematics teachers’ ability to notice). Germany: Kiel.Google Scholar
  57. Yang, Y., & Ricks, T. E. (2012). How crucial incidents analysis support Chinese lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 41–48. doi:10.1108/20468251211179696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zawojewski, J., Chamberlin, M. T., Hjalmarson, M. A., & Lewis, C. (2008). Developing design studies in mathematics education professional development: studying teachers’ interpretive systems. In A. Kelly, R. Lesh, & J. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 219–245). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations