# Examining equity of opportunities for learning mathematics through positioning theory

Original Article

First Online:

- 704 Downloads
- 5 Citations

## Abstract

This exploratory study examined how two teachers from two New Zealand primary schools introduced and taught the same mathematics lesson to their lowest ability group of year 2 and 3 students. Emphasis was given to analysing the positioning of the teacher and students and the developing storylines and social acts from that positioning. Different positionings by teachers of themselves and their students led to inequitable opportunities for active and collaborative participation in the mathematics. The differences in pedagogy revealed through the use of positioning theory suggest that the way teachers positioned themselves and their students was more influential than the resources they were teaching with.

## Keywords

Primary Numeracy Positioning Collaboration Participation Equity## References

- Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., & Spence, J. (2000). Why should we group students within-class for learning?
*Educational Research and Evaluation, 6*(2), 158–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Angrosino, M. V., & Mays de Perez, K. A. (2003). Rethinking observation from method to context. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),
*Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials*(pp. 107–154). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar - Anthony, G., & Hunter, R. (2005). A window into mathematics classrooms: traditional to reform.
*New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 40*(1), 25–43.Google Scholar - Askew, M. (2011). Unscripted maths: emergence and improvisation. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.).
*Mathematics: traditions and [new] practices. Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers*(pp. 56-67). Alice Springs: Australia, MERGA.Google Scholar - Attard, C. (2011). The influence of teachers on student engagement with mathematics during the middle years. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.).
*Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices. Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers*(pp. 68-74). Alice Springs, Australia: MERGA.Google Scholar - Babbie, E. (2007).
*The practice of social research*(11th ed.). Belmont CA: Thomson.Google Scholar - Barnes, M. (2004).
*The use of positioning theory in studying student participation in collaborative learning activities*. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar - Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach.
*British Educational Research Journal, 34*(2), 167–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Boaler, J. (2014). Ability grouping in mathematics classrooms. In S. Lerman (Ed.),
*Encyclopedia of mathematics education*(pp. 1–5). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar - Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping: disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure.
*British Educational Research Journal, 26*, 631–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bobis, J., Clarke, B., Clarke, D., Thomas, G., Wright, B., & Young-Loveridge, J. (2005). Supporting teachers in the development of young children’s mathematical thinking: three large scale cases.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16*(3), 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2002).
*Social constructivist teaching: affordances and constraints*. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar - Brophy, J. (2006). Graham Nuthall and social constructivist teaching: research-based cautions and qualifications.
*Teaching and Teacher Education, 22*, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Choppin, J. (2011). The impact of professional noticing on teachers’ adaptations of challenging tasks.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13*(3), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development.
*Educational Researcher, 23*(7), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cobb, S. C. (2012).
*You use your imagination: an investigation into how students use ‘imaging’ during numeracy activities*. University of Canterbury, Christchurch. Retrieved http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/7168 - Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007).
*Research methods in education*(6th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar - Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. C. (2008).
*Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory*(3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar - Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: the discursive production of selves.
*Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20*(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.),
*Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action*(pp. 32–52). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Denscombe, M. (2010).
*The good research guide for small-scale social research projects*(4th ed.). England: Open University Press.Google Scholar - Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011).
*The sage handbook of qualitative research*(4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar - DfES. (2005).
*Higher standards, better schools for all: more choice for parents and pupils*. London: DFES.Google Scholar - Doyle, W., & Carter, K. (1984). Academic tasks in classrooms.
*Curriculum Inquiry, 14*(2), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Edwards, D. (1997).
*Discourse and cognition*. London: Sage.Google Scholar - Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992).
*Discursive psychology*. London: Sage.Google Scholar - Elia, I., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kolovou, A. (2009). Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics.
*ZDM Mathematics Education, 41*, 605–618. doi: 10.1007/s11858-009-0184-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ernest, P. E. (1996). Varieties of constructivism: a framework for comparison. In L. P. Steffe & P. Nesher (Eds.),
*Theories of mathematical learning*(pp. 335–349). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Ewing, B. (2011). Direct instruction in mathematics: issues for schools with high indigenous enrolments: a literature review.
*Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36*(5), 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Garden, R. (1996).
*Mathematics performance of New Zealand form 2 and form 3 students. National results from New Zealand’s participation in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study*. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar - Garden, R. (1997).
*Mathematics and science in middle primary school: results from New Zealand’s participation in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study*. Wellington: Research and International Section, Ministry of Education.Google Scholar - Gillham, B. (2000).
*Case study research methods*. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar - Habibis, D. (2006). Ethics and social research. In M. Walter (Ed.),
*Social research methods: an Australian perspective*(pp. 53–82). Melbourne, VA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Harré, R. (1997). Forward to Aristotle: a case for a hybrid ontology.
*Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27*(2/3), 173–191.Google Scholar - Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). Introduction: the self and others in traditional psychology and in positioning theory. In R. Harré & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.),
*The self and others: positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts*(pp. 1–11). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar - Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F.M. (2014). Positioning theory. In N. Bozatzis and T. Dragonas (Eds.)
*The discursive turn in social psychology*(pp 129-138). Retrieved http://www.taosinstitute.net/Websites/taos/images/PublicationsWorldShare/DiscursiveTurn_f_v2.pdf#page=129 - Harré, R., & Secord, P. F. (1972).
*The explanation of social behaviour*. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Harré, R., & Slocum, N. (2003). Disputes as complex social events: on the uses of positioning theory. In R. Harré & F. Moghaddam (Eds.),
*The self and others: positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts*(pp. 123–136). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar - Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning.
*Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21*(4), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.),
*Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action*(pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18*(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K. R., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: revelations on an imported theory.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89*(2), 185–204. doi: 10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Higgins, J., & Parsons, R. (2009). A successful professional development model in mathematics: a system-wide New Zealand case.
*Journal of Teacher Education, 60*(3), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Higgins, J., Irwin, K., Thomas, G., Trinick, T., & Young-Loveridge, J. (2005).
*Findings from the New Zealand Numeracy Development Project 2004*. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar - Hollway, W. (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, L. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.),
*Changing the subject: psychology, social regulation and subjectivity*. London: Methuen.Google Scholar - Holt, G. (2001). Mathematics education for Māori students in mainstream classrooms.
*ACE Papers, 11*, 18–29.Google Scholar - Hunter, J. (2006). The Numeracy Project: foundations and development.
*ACE Papers, 17*. Retrieved from http://www.education.auckland.ac.nz - Johnson, M., Griffiths, D., & Wang, M. (2011). Positioning theory, roles and the design and implementation of learning technology.
*Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17*(9), 1329–1346.Google Scholar - Kolovou, A., Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Bakker, A. (2009). Non-routine problem solving tasks in primary school mathematics textbooks—a needle in a haystack.
*Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8*(2), 31–68.Google Scholar - Kutnick, P., Sebba, J., Blatchford, P., Galton, M., & Thorp, J. (2005).
*The effects of pupil grouping: literature review*. London, DfES. Research Report 688.Google Scholar - Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: mathematical knowing and teaching.
*American Educational Research Journal, 27*, 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lee, C. Y., & Chen, M. P. (2009). A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: the effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge.
*Computers and Education, 52*(3), 530–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).
*Naturalistic inquiry*. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar - MacIntyre, H., & Ireson, J. (2002). Within-class ability grouping: placement of pupils in groups and self concept.
*British Educational Research Journal, 28*(2), 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mamona-Downs, J., & Downs, M. (2005). The identity of problem solving.
*Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 24*(3-4), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Marchis, J. (2012). Non-routine problems in primary mathematics workbooks from Romania.
*Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5*(3), 49–56.Google Scholar - Merriam, S. B. (1998).
*Qualitative research and case study applications in education (revised and expanded from case study research in education)*. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar - Merriam, S. B. (2009).
*Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation*(2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar - Mertens, D. (2005).
*Research and evaluation in psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods*(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar - Ministry of Education. (2007a).
*Numeracy Professional Development Projects: book 5: teaching addition and subtraction*. New Zealand: Wellington.Google Scholar - Ministry of Education. (2007b).
*Numeracy Professional Development Projects: book 1: the number framework*. New Zealand: Wellington.Google Scholar - Ministry of Education. (2007c).
*Numeracy Professional Development Projects: book 3: getting started*. New Zealand: Wellington.Google Scholar - Moghaddam, F., Harré, R., & Lee, N. (2008). Positioning and conflict: an introduction. In F. Moghaddam, R. Harré, & N. Lee (Eds.),
*Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis*(pp. 3–20). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Muhlhauser, P., & Harré, R. (1990).
*Pronouns and people*. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Smith, T. A., Garden, R. A., Gregory, K. D., Gonzalez, E. J., et al. (2003).
*TIMSS assessment frameworks and specifications 2003*(2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar - Murphy, J. (1988). Equity as student opportunity to learn.
*Theory Into Practice, 27*(2), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Murphy, C. (2013). Thinkpiece: making space for mathematics learning to happen in group work: is this really possible?
*Teachers and Curriculum, 13*, 108–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - O’Keeffe, L., & O’Donoghue, J. (2011).
*A review of school textbooks for project maths*. Retrieved http://www.nce-stl.ie/_fileupload/Reports/Project%20Maths%20Textbook%20Report%20November%202012.pdf - Partington, G. (2001). Qualitative research interviews: identifying problems in technique.
*Issues in Educational Research, 11*(2), 32–44.Google Scholar - Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data.
*Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 22*(4), 405–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Redman, C., & Fawns, R. (2010). How to use pronoun grammar as a methodological tool for understanding the dynamic lived space of people. In S. Rodrigues (Ed.),
*Using analytical frameworks for classroom research: collecting data and analysing narrative*(pp. 163–182). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Rogoff, B. (1990).
*Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context*. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Scouller, D. (2009). Has strategy become the new algorithm?
*The New Zealand Mathematics Magazine, 46*(3), 1–11.Google Scholar - Sfard, A. (2000). Symbolizing mathematical reality into being—or, how mathematical discourse and mathematical objects can create each other. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.),
*Symbolizing and communicating in mathematical classrooms: perspectives on discourse, tools and mathematical design*(pp. 37–98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Slocum-Bradley, N. (2010). The positioning diamond: a trans-disciplinary framework for discourse analysis.
*Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40*(1), 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011).
*Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions*. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar - Tait-McCutcheon, S. (2014).
*Teacher practice in primary mathematics classrooms: a story of positioning (unpublished doctoral thesis)*. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar - Teong, S. K., Hedberg, J. G., Ho, K. F., Lioe, L. T., Tiong, Y. S. J., Wong, K. Y. & Fang, Y. P. (2009).
*Developing the repertoire of heuristics for mathematical problem solving: project 1*. Final Technical Report for Project CRP1/04 JH. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. http://hdl.handle.net/10497/4151. - Thomas, G., & Tagg, A. (2004).
*An evaluation of the Early Numeracy Project 2003*. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar - van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.),
*Positioning theory: moral contexts of intentional action*(pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Varela, C. R., & Harré, R. (1996). Conflicting varieties of realism: causal powers and the problems of social structure.
*Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26*(3), 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - von Glasersfeld, E. (1992).
*Aspects of radical constructivism and its educational recommendations*. Paper presented at the ICME-7, Draft to working group #4, Montreal. Retrieved from www.umass.edu/srri/vonGalsersfeld/onlinePapers/html/195.html - Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72*(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Waite, L. (2014).
*Mathematics or numeracy: education indications from Steiner and the New Zealand curriculum*(Doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology).Google Scholar - Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2006). Classroom arrangements that benefit students. In
*29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Identities cultures and learning spaces*. Canberra, Australia: MERGA.Google Scholar - Wittgenstein, L. (1953).
*Philosophical investigations*. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Wittgenstein, L. (1969).
*On certainty*. (Trans. D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Yin, R. K. (2003).
*Case study research, design and methods*. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar - Young-Loveridge, J. (2010). A decade of reform in mathematics education: results for 2009 and earlier years. In
*Findings from the New Zealand Numeracy Development Projects: 2009*(pp. 15–35). Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2016