Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 31–51 | Cite as

Rhythm in number: exploring the affective, social and mathematical dimensions of using TouchCounts

Original Article

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the mathematical, social and affective nature of children’s engagement with TouchCounts, a multitouch application for counting and doing arithmetic. In order to study these dimensions of engagement in a way that recognizes their fundamental intertwinement, we use rhythm as a primary unit of analysis. Drawing on over 8 hours of research sessions with children aged 6, 7 and 8 years old, we show how various rhythms emerged from their interactions and how these rhythms changed over time—moving from the particular to the more general. We also show how important rhythm is to children’s carrying of activity, which relates to aspects of interest and motivation.

Keywords

Number sense Touch screen Early learning Engagement Rhythm Affect 

References

  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bautista, A., & Roth, W.-M. (2012). The incarnate rhythm of geometrical knowing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2011. 09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Sessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Jackiw, N. (2006). Mechanism and magic in the psychology of dynamic geometry. In N. Sinclair, W. Higginson, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Mathematics and the aesthetic: new approaches to an ancient affinity. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Radford, L., Bardini, C., & Sabena, C. (2007). Perceiving the general. The multi-semiotic dimension of students’ algebraic activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 507–530.Google Scholar
  11. Roth, W.-M. (2011). Geometry as objective science in elementary classrooms: Mathematics in the flesh. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Rotman, B. (2003). Will the digital computer transform classical mathematics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , A361, 1675–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). Animation: The fundamental, essential, and properly descriptive concept. Continental Philosophy Review, 42, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sinclair, N. & Jackiw, N. (2014). TouchCounts [software application for the iPad]. https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/touchcounts/id897302197?mt=8
  15. Sinclair, N., & Pimm, D. (2015). Whatever be their number. In M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, K. Mavrou, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contemporary mathematics education. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  16. Sinclair, N., de Freitas, E., & Ferrara, F. (2013). Virtual encounters: the murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Staats, S. (2008). Poetric lines in mathematical discourse: a method from linguistic anthropology. For The Learning of Mathematics, 28(2), 26–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathalie Sinclair
    • 1
  • Sean Chorney
    • 1
  • Sheree Rodney
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations