“My favourite subject is maths. For some reason no-one really agrees with me”: student perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning in the upper primary classroom

  • Catherine Attard
Original Article


The levels of engagement in mathematics experienced by students during the middle years of schooling (Years 5 to 8 in New South Wales) has been of concern in Australia for some years. Lowered engagement in school has been attributed to factors such as inappropriate teaching strategies, curricula that is unchallenging and irrelevant, and cultural and technological conditions that continue to evolve (Sullivan et al. Australian Journal of Education 53(2):176-191, 2009). There is currently a gap in this field of research in terms of a lack of longitudinal studies conducted in an Australian context that feature students’ voices and their perceptions of mathematics teaching and learning during the middle years. As part of a qualitative longitudinal case study spanning 3 school years, 20 students in their final year of primary school (aged between 11 and 12 years) were asked to provide their views on mathematics teaching and learning. The aim of the study was to explore the students’ perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning to discover pedagogies that engage the students. During focus group discussions and individual interviews the students discussed qualities of a “good” mathematics teacher and aspects of “good” lessons. These were found to resonate well with current Australian quality teaching frameworks. The findings of this study indicate that students in the middle years are critically aware of pedagogies that lead to engagement in mathematics, and existing standards and frameworks should be used as a starting point for quality teaching of mathematics.


Engagement Middle years Interactions Relationship Pedagogy 


  1. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Effective pedagogy in mathematics (Vol. 19). Belley, France: The International Academy of EducationGoogle Scholar
  3. Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997a). Effective teachers of numeracy: Final report. London: King's College.Google Scholar
  4. Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Wiliam, D., & Johnson, D. (1997b). Effective teachers of numeracy in primary schools: Teachers’ beliefs, practices and pupils’ learning. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from
  5. Athanasiou, C., & Philippou, G. N. (2009, July). Students’ views of their motivation in mathematics across the transition from primary to secondary school. Paper presented at the 33 rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar
  6. Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers [AAMT]. (2006). Standards of excellence in teaching mathematics in Australian schools. Adelaide: Australian Association of Mathematics TeachersGoogle Scholar
  7. Barker, K., Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2005, December). Effects between motivational goals, academic self-concept and academic achievement: What is the causal ordering? Paper presented at the Australian Association of Educational Research (AARE), Sydney.Google Scholar
  8. Boaler, J. (2000). Mathematics from another world: traditional communities and the alienation of learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). National numeracy review report. Canberra, ACT.: Human Capital Working Group, Council of Australian Governments.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas Willms, J., Friesen, S., & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Toronto, ON: Canadian Education Association.Google Scholar
  11. Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children's risk for school problems contribute to children's behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36(3), 413–432.Google Scholar
  12. Fair Go Team NSW Department of Education and Training. (2006). School is for me: Pathways to student engagement. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, D. C.: National Center for Education Statistics (ED).Google Scholar
  14. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Grootenboer, P., Lomas, G., & Ingram, N. (2008). The affective domain. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, T. S. Wee, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004–2007 (pp. 255–270). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Haberman, M. (2005). Star teachers: The ideology and best practice of effective teachers of diverse children and youth in poverty. Houstan, TX: Haberman Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Hardy, C. L., Bukowski, W., & Sippola, L. K. (2002). Stability and change in peer relationships during the transition to middle-level school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 22(2), 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture on the postmodern age. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  20. Hattie, J. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Building Teacher Quality: The ACER Annual Conference, Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
  21. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lappan, G., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (1993). Knowing and doing mathematics: a new vision for middle grades students. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 625–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leckey, M. (2000, June). Philosophy for children in the middle years of schooling: findings from a year seven case study. Paper presented at the NAACI Conference, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  24. Lingard, R. L., Ladwig, J., Mills, M. D., Bahr, M. P., Chant, D. C., & Warry, M. (2001). The Queensland school reform longitudinal study (QSRLS). State of Queensland (Department of Education): Brisbane.Google Scholar
  25. Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: what to do, what to say. Intervention in School & Clinic, 41(4), 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, A. J. (2006). The relationship between teachers’ perceptions of student motivation and engagement and teachers’ enjoyment of and confidence in teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, A. J. (2008). Motivation and Engagement Scale: High School (MES-HS) Test User Manual. Sydney: Lifelong Achievement Group.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., & Green, J. (2009). Young people's interpersonal relationships and academic and nonacademic outcomes: Scoping the relative salience of teachers, parents, same-sex peers, and opposite-sex peers [Electronic Version]. Teachers College Record, March 2009. Retrieved May 5th 2009 from
  29. McGee, C., Ward, R., Gibbons, J., & Harlow, A. (2003). Transition to secondary school: A literature review. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  30. McKinney, S., Cappell, S., Berry, R. Q., & Hickman, B. T. (2009). An examination of the instructional practices of mathematics teachers in urban schools. Preventing School Failure, 53(4), 278–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McPhan, G., Moroney, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why not? Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  32. Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research [Electronic Version]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8–13.Google Scholar
  34. Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newstead, J. (1998). Aspects of children's mathematics anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools. Sydney: Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate.Google Scholar
  37. NSW Institute of Teachers. (2004). Professional teaching standards. Sydney: Author.Google Scholar
  38. Olson, J. C. (2007). Developing students’ mathematical reasoning: through games. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(9), 464–471.Google Scholar
  39. Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialisation of adolescents’ motivation, engagement and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 25(2), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. State of Victoria Department of Education and Training. (2004). Middle years of schooling: Overview of Victorian Research 1998–2004. Retrieved July 7, 2005, from
  42. Sullivan, P., & McDonough, A. (2007, July). Eliciting positive student motivation for learning mathematics. Paper presented at the Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice: 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, Tasmania.Google Scholar
  43. Sullivan, P., McDonough, A., & Harrison, R. T. (2004, July). Students’ perceptions of factors contributing to successful participation in mathematics. Paper presented at the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  44. Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2005). Increasing access to mathematical thinking. The Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, 32(2), 105–109.Google Scholar
  45. Sullivan, P., Tobias, S., & McDonough, A. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White-Clark, R., Di-Carlo, M., & Gilchriest, N. (2008). "Guide on the side": an instructional approach to meet mathematics standards. The High School Journal, 91(4), 40–44.Google Scholar
  47. Whitley, J., Lupart, J. L., & Beran, T. (2007). Differences in achievement between adolescents who remain in a K-8 school and those who transition to a junior high school. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 649–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations