Skip to main content
Log in

Bias regularization in neural network models for general insurance pricing

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
European Actuarial Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generalized linear models have the important property of providing unbiased estimates on a portfolio level. This implies that generalized linear models manage to provide accurate prices on a portfolio level. On the other hand, neural networks may provide very accurate prices on an individual policy level, but state-of-the-art use of neural networks does not pay any attention to unbiasedness on the portfolio level. This is an implicit consequence of applying early stopping rules in gradient descent methods for model fitting. In the present paper we discuss this deficiency and we provide two different techniques to overcome this drawback of neural network model fitting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey RA (1963) Insurance rates with minimum bias. Proc CAS 50:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barndorff-Nielsen O (2014) Information and exponential families: in statistical theory. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth Statistics/Probability Series

  4. Bühlmann H (1980) An economic premium principle. ASTIN Bull 11(1):52–60

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bühlmann H, Gisler A (2005) A course in credibility theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Denuit M, Maréchal X, Pitrebois S, Walhin J-F (2007) Actuarial modelling of claim counts. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Draxler F, Veschgini K, Salmhofer M, Hamprecht FA (2019) Essentially no barriers in neural network energy landscape. arXiv:1803.00885v5

  8. Esscher F (1932) On the probability function in the collective theory of risk. Scand Actuar J 1932(3):175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frees EW (2010) Regression modeling with actuarial and financial applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Garipov T, Izmailov P, Podoprikhin D, Vetrov D, Wilson AG (2018) Loss surfaces, mode connectivity, and fast ensembling of DNNs. arXiv:1802.10026v4

  11. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jørgensen B (1987) Exponential dispersion models. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 49/2:127–145

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung J (1968) On automobile insurance ratemaking. ASTIN Bull 5:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1983) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM (1972) Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser A (General) 135/3:370–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohlsson E, Johansson B (2010) Non-life insurance pricing with generalized linear models. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Wüthrich MV, Buser C (2016) Data analytics for non-life insurance pricing. SSRN Manuscript ID 2870308, Version of June 4, 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario V. Wüthrich.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wüthrich, M.V. Bias regularization in neural network models for general insurance pricing. Eur. Actuar. J. 10, 179–202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-019-00215-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-019-00215-z

Keywords

Navigation