Advertisement

European Actuarial Journal

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 363–381 | Cite as

Examining the impact on mortality arising from climate change: important findings for the insurance industry

  • Tatjana MiljkovicEmail author
  • Dragan Miljkovic
  • Karsten Maurer
Original Research Paper
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the impact on overall mortality rates for the general US population arising from climate change and the weather events resulting in property damages for the period 1968–2013. We develop a fixed effects panel data model for the impact of climate change on property damage, with precipitation having a more pronounced effect than extreme temperatures. Using the Dumitrescu–Hurlin panel data causality test, we found that property damages Granger cause an increase in mortality rates for the middle age and old age population. Therefore, property damage can further be used to improve the prediction of future mortality rates in the US. Our findings are important for the insurance industry, which is currently seeking ways to incorporate the impact of climate change. The industry is developing the Actuaries Climate Index and the Actuaries Climate Risk Index which have the objective of informing the insurance industry about the impact of extreme weather and its associated risks.

Keywords

Climate change Mortality Insurance Property damage Dumitrescu–Hurlin causality test. 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babcock B, Hennessy D (1996) Input demand under yield and revenue insurance. Am J Agric Econ 78(2):416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barreca A (2012) Climate change, humidity, and mortality in the United States. J Environ Econ Manag 63:19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carriquiry M, Osgood D (2012) Index insurance, probabilistic climate forecasts, and production. J Risk Insur 79(1):139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chambers R, Quiggin J (2002) Optimal producer behavior in the presence of area-yield crop insurance. Am J Agric Econ 84(2):320–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang C, Lin S, Yu M (2011) Valuation of catastrophe equity puts with Markov-modulated Poisson processes. J Risk Insur 78(2):447–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cleveland W (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74(368):829–836MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conti S, Masocco M, Meli P, Minelli G, Palummeri E, Solimini R, Toccaceli V, Vichi M (2007) General and specific mortality among the elderly during the 2003 heat wave in Genoa (Italy). Environ Res 103(2):267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conti S, Meli P, Minelli G, Solimini R, Toccaceli V, Vichi M, Beltrano C, Perini L (2005) Epidemiologic study of mortality during the summer 2003 heat wave in Italy. Environ Res 98(3):390–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curry L, Weaver A, Wiebe E (2012) Determining the impact of climate change on insurance risk and the global community. Phase I: climate phase indicators report sponsored by the American Academy of Actuaries Property/Casualty Extreme Events Committee, the Canadian Institute of Actuaries (CIA), the Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS), and the Society of Actuaries (SOA)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deschenes O, Greenstone M (2011) Climate change, mortality, and adaptation: evidence from annual fluctuations in weather in the US. Appl Econ 3:152–185Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dumitrescu E, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fang L, Wu J, Miljkovic T (2017) Modeling impact of natural hazard-induced disasters on income distribution in the United States. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 8(4):435–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Granger C (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econom Econom Soc 37(3):424–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hallegatte S (2014) Natural disasters and climate change. Springer International Publishing, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hazards & Vulnerability Research Institute (2015) The spatial hazard events and losses database for the United States, version 14.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, University of South Carolina. http://www.sheldus.org/. Accessed 20 Oct 2015
  17. 17.
    Hellmuth M, Osgood D, Hess U, Moorhead A, Bhojwani H (2006) Index insurance and climate risk: prospects for development and disaster management. New York: Climate and Society No. 2. International Research Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) Columbia UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Im K, Pesaran M, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115(1):53–74MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karl T, Koss WJ (1984) Regional and national monthly, seasonal, and annual temperature weighted by area, 1895–1983. National Climatic Data Center, AshevilleGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kovacevic R, Pflug G (2011) Does insurance help to escape the poverty trap? A ruin theoretic approach. J Risk Insur 78(4):1003–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levin A, Lin C, Chu C (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108(1):1–24MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahul O (2001) Optimal insurance against climatic experience. Am J Agric Econ 83(3):593–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miljkovic T, Miljkovic D (2014) Modeling impact of hurricane damages on income distribution in the coastal US. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5(4):265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Center for Health Statistics (1989–1998) Compressed mortality file (machine readable data file and documentation, CD ROM series 20, no. \(2\)E) as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program, Hyattsville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Center for Health Statistics (1999–2013) Compressed mortality file (machine readable data file and documentation, CD ROM series \(20\), no. \(2\)S) as compiled from data provided by the \(57\) vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program, Hyattsville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Centers for Environmental Information (2015) Enhanced member station history report. National Oceanic and Athmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/homr/reports/mshr. Accessed 6 Oct 2016
  28. 28.
    Patz J, Campbell-Lendrum D, Holloway T, Foley J (2005) Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 438(7066):310–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 Oct 2015
  30. 30.
    Ramaswami B (1993) Supply response to agricultural insurance: risk reduction and moral hazard effects. Am J Agric Econ 75(4):914–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schipper L, Pelling M (2006) Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters 30(1):19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stigler G (1952) The theory of price, 6th edn. Macmillan Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Aalst M (2006) The impacts of climate change on the risk of natural disasters. Disasters 30(1):5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Waldron H (2007) Trends in mortality differentials and life expectancy for male social security-covered workers, by average relative earnings. No. 108. Social Security Administration, Office of Policy, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, Social Security AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Worfolk J (2000) Heat waves: their impact on the health of elders. Geriatr Nurs 21(2):70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EAJ Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsMiami UniversityOxfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Applied EconomicsNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations