Abstract
Completion of higher-level mathematics courses in secondary school is advantageous for success in many university-level science, technology, engineering and mathematics courses. Based on survey data from 942 Year 10 students from Western Australia, the Year 11 mathematics course choices made by girls and boys were compared. Findings indicated that girls, and especially high-achieving girls, were more likely than boys to pursue mathematics courses at a lower level than their teachers considered they were capable of completing successfully. Findings also indicated that while both boys and girls were most influenced by teachers and parents in making mathematics course choices, older siblings and older students were more influential on girls than on boys. In general, students who chose mathematics courses of lesser challenge than their teachers recommended reported being less influenced by teachers and the media than others. Findings highlight potential sociocultural pathways through which changes in enrolment patterns may be encouraged.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Due to ethical restrictions, data cannot be made openly available.
References
ACARA. (2013). National assessment program-literacy and numeracy achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy. National report for 2013. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/
Australian Government, Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2020). Why is STEM important? Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/national-stem-education-resources-toolkit/why-stem-important-0
Barrington, F. & Evans, M. (2014). Participation in Year 12 mathematics 2004–2014. Retrieved from http://amsi.org.au/publications/participation-in-year-12-mathematics-2004-2014/
Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2012). My fair physicist? Feminine math and science role models demotivate young girls. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612440735.
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMming the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471.
Degol, J. L., Wang, M. T., Ye, F., & Zhang, C. (2017). Who makes the cut? Parental involvement and mathematics trajectories predicting college enrolment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 50, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.03.007.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Eccles, J. (2011). Gendered educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398185.
Ernest, J. B., Reinholz, D. L., & Shah, N. (2019). Hidden competence: women’s mathematical participation in public and private classroom spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09910-w.
Fan, W. (2011). Social influences, school motivation and gender differences: An application of the expectancy-value theory. Educational Psychology, 31(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.536525.
Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Lüdtke, O. (2018). Emotion transmission in the classroom revisited: A reciprocal effects model of teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000228.
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x.
Gemici, S., Bednarz, A., Karmel, T., & Lim, P. (2014). Parental influences drive young people’s educational aspirations. Adelaide: NCVER.
Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Do girls really experience more anxiety in mathematics? Psychological Science, 24(10), 2079–2087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486989.
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2.
Government of Western Australia, Department of Education. (2019a). Alphabetical list of Western Australian schools by education region. Retrieved from http://det.wa.edu.au/schoolinformation/detcms/navigation/ statistical-reports/
Government of Western Australia, Department of Education. (2019b). Full-time primary and secondary enrolments by year level. Retrieved from http://det.wa.edu.au/schoolinformation/detcms/navigation/statistical-reports
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363.
Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M., & Lloyd, A. (2018). An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(4), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9793-z.
Jeffries, D., Curtis, D. D., & Conner, L. N. (2019). Student factors influencing STEM subject choice in year 12: A structural equation model using PISA/LSAY data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09972-5.
Joensen, J. S., & Nielsen, H. S. (2018). Spillovers in education choice. Journal of Public Economics, 157, 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.10.006.
Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Morger, V., & Hensley, L. (2014). Feeling and showing: A new conceptualization of dispositional teacher enthusiasm and its relation to students’ interest. Learning and Instruction, 33, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.001.
Kirkham, J., Chapman, E., & Wildy, H. (2019). Factors considered by Western Australian Year 10 students in choosing Year 11 mathematics courses. Mathematics Education Research Journal. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00277-y.
Kirkham, J., & Chapman, E. (2020). Gendered decision-making about mathematics courses: Contributions of self-perceptions, domain-perceptions, and sociocultural factors. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 10(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v10n1p43.
Korpershoek, H., Guntern, S., & van der Werf, G. (2014). The impact of significant others on gender-atypical, gender-typical, and gender-neutral study choices. Gruppendyn Organisationsberat, 45, 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-014-0263-1.
Lazarides, R., Rubach, C., & Ittel, A. (2017). Adolescents’ perceptions of socializers’ beliefs, career related conversations, and motivation in mathematics. Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000270.
Leder, G. C., Forgasz, H. J., & Jackson, G. (2014). Mathematics, English and gender issues: Do teachers count? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(9). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n9.3.
Legewie, J., & DiPrete, T. A. (2012). School context and the gender gap in educational achievement. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412440802.
Li, N., & Koch, I. (2017). Choose mathematics gender report: Participation, performance, and attitudes towards mathematics. Melbourne: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute.
Marsh, H., Pekrun, R., Parker, P., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. (2018). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000281.
McMillan, J., & Edwards, D. (2019). Performance in first year mathematics and science subjects in Australian universities: Does senior secondary mathematics background matter? Australian Council of Deans of Science & Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from https://research.acer.edu.au/higher_education/62
Microsoft. (2017). Why Europe’s girls aren’t studying STEM. Retrieved from https://news.microsoft.com/europe/features/dont-european-girls-like-science-technology/
Nagy, G., Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2010). The development of students’ mathematical self-concept in relation to gender: Different countries, different trajectories? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 482–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00644.x.
Prinsley, R., Beavis, A. S., & Clifford-Hordacre, N. (2016). Busting myths about women in STEM. Office of the Chief Scientist, 13. Retrieved from https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/sites/default/files/OCS-paper-13.pdf
Oo, A. (2017). Why aren’t students studying higher level mathematics? How ATAR scaling may affect mathematics uptake. Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation. Retrieved from www.cese.nsw.gov.au
Riegle-Crumb, C., Peng, M., & Russo-Tait, T. (2019). Committed to STEM? Examining factors that predict occupational commitment among Asian and white female students completing STEM U.S. postsecondary programs. Sex Roles, 82, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-0103-8.
Robnett, R., & Leaper, C. (2012). Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students’ STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(4), 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12013.
Roster, C. A., Lucianetti, L., & Albaum, G. (2015). Exploring slider vs. categorical response formats in web-based surveys. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), Article D1. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/509/413
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. 10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68.
Parker, P. D., Van Zanden, B., Marsh, H. W., Owen, K., Duineveld, J. J., & Noetel, M. (2020). The intersection of gender, social class, and cultural context: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 197–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09493-1.
School Curriculum and Standards Authority, Government of Western Australia. (2014). Western Australian curriculum and assessment outline. Retrieved from http://www.scsa.wa.edu.au/
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worche & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Hall Publishers.
Tertiary Institutions Service Centre, Western Australia (2019). 2019 Western Australia school leavers with an ATAR: ATAR range by gender breakdown. Retrieved from https://www.tisc.edu.au/static-fixed/statistics/annual-report/2019-2020/atar-gender-breakdown.pdf
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: girls' and women's education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253479
Vitoroulis, I., Schneider, B. H., Vasquez, C. C., del Pilar Soteras de Toro, M., & Gonzales, Y. S. (2012). Perceived parental and peer support in relation to Canadian, Cuban, and Spanish adolescents’ valuing of academics and intrinsic academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111405657.
Volet, S., & Kimmel, K. (2012). Editorial introduction: Motivation and learning in multiple contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 115–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0079-0.
Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765562.
Watt, H. M. G. (2016). Promoting girls’ and boy’s engagement and participation in senior secondary STEM fields and occupational aspirations. Retrieved from https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1285&context=research_conference
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirkham, J., Chapman, E. Gender, achievement level and sociocultural factors in the mathematics course choices of Year 10 students in Western Australia. Aust. Educ. Res. 49, 97–114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00425-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00425-5