Skip to main content

‘So you can make it fast or make it up’: K–12 teachers’ perspectives on technology’s affordances and constraints when supporting distance education learning

The Australian Educational Researcher volume 48, pages 359–376 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper examined Australian distance education teachers’ perspectives about how they drew on technological tools to support their primary and secondary students’ learning. Via two focus groups (n = 9, n = 7), teachers identified that technology greatly assisted them in relation to developing relationships with students and families, creating interactive lessons, differentiating learning, providing quality feedback, and connecting peers. However, they also reported experiencing ongoing challenges and constraints related to gaining technology expertise, overcoming technology faults, and coping with additional accountability. Data made it clear that teacher use of technology was driven by specific student needs and that teachers drew heavily on both core pedagogical knowledge and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Findings suggest the need for more distance education specific professional development to ensure that teachers have the knowledges needed to support diverse learners in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Anderson, T. (2009). A rose by any other name: Still distance education—A response to D.R.Garrison: Implications of online and blended learning for the conceptual development and practice of distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, L. & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK Among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71–88. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29332/.

  • Archambault, L., & Kennedy, K. (2017). Making the choice to go online: Exploring virtual schooling as an option for K-12 students. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of school choice (pp. 384–402). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018). My school. Retrieved May 15, 2019 from https://myschool.edu.au/.

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). Australian curriculum: General capabilities. Retrieved May 15, 2019 om https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/.

  • Avrich, P. (2014). The modern school movement: Anarchism and education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. K. (2017). K–12 online learning and school choice: Growth and expansion in the absence of evidence. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of school choice (pp. 421–440). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.009. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131508001450

  • Bloomfield, C., Harreveld, B., & Fisher, R. (2020). Hesitant hopes: How a comprehensive approach to learning impacts on the transition hopes of marginalised young people in an alternative learning programme in regional Australia. British Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borup, J., & Kennedy, K. (2017). The case for K-12 online learning. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of School Choice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borup, J., West, R. E., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2014). The adolescent community of engagement: A framework for research on adolescent online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, J. (2017). Virtual schooling in Australia: From “School of the Air” to “Distance Education”. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of School Choice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, C. S., Barbour, M. K., & Clark, T. (2009). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of open access literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i1.607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R. E., Black, E. W., & Presto, M. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 10–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. (2018). Re-engaging young people with education: The steps after disengagement and exclusion. Baskingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finger, G., & Rotolo, C. (2001). Telephone teaching: Towards constructivist teaching for rural and remote students. In Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Freemantle, WA.

  • Harding, T. (2012). Non-government distance education funding: the need for equity in Australian schooling. Distance Education, 33(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. R. (2011). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of student engagement: Engagement in learning or in schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 376–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012). Offering preservice teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K. (2017). Pedagogical practices of NetNZ teachers for supporting online distance learners. Distance Education, 38(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1371830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2014). Re-engaging young people in education: Learning from alternative schools. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E., Rodriguez-Manzanares, M., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehn, N., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2017). Navigating the challenges of delivery secondary school courses by videoconference. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 802–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehn, N., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2018). The specific skills required of teachers who deliver K–12 distance education courses by synchronous videoconference: Implications for training and professional development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(4), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1483265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiach, S., Cassidy, V., & Averbeck, C. (2012). The evolution of distance education in Australia. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(4), 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, K. (2009). Priorities in K-12 distance education: A Delphi study examining multiple perspectives on policy, practice, and research. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, E. (2005). The history of distance education in Australia. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(3), 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Learning Design and Innovation, Tertiary Education Division, Central Queensland University, 160 Ann St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia

    Kate Ames

  2. School of Education and the Arts, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia

    Lois Ruth Harris, Joanne Dargusch & Corey Bloomfield

Authors
  1. Kate Ames
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lois Ruth Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joanne Dargusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Corey Bloomfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Ames.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ames, K., Harris, L.R., Dargusch, J. et al. ‘So you can make it fast or make it up’: K–12 teachers’ perspectives on technology’s affordances and constraints when supporting distance education learning. Aust. Educ. Res. 48, 359–376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00395-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00395-8

Keywords

  • Teacher engagement
  • Distance education
  • Diversity
  • Online learning K–12
  • School-based learning
  • Teaching strategies