Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender differences in experiences and motivation in a Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood Studies) course: Can these explain higher male attrition rates?

The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, due to regulatory and prospective political reforms, Australian universities face an increased demand to supply quality early childhood teachers. While student attrition remains a general concern for all universities, this demand has presented a renewed focus on retention in Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood Studies [ECS]). The purpose of this study is to examine the experiences and motivations of preservice teachers, hypothesise the relation with attrition and determine gender differences. The data were gained from two sources. The first was from data held at a Western Australian university examining enrolment trends in ECS. Chi-square analysis revealed that male preservice teachers were significantly more likely to withdraw than their female counterparts. The second set of data were extracted from two independent qualitative studies on preservice teacher retention in the ECS course. Twenty-six preservice teachers participated in these studies and a total of 45 h of interviews were coded against indicators of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. It was found that while female preservice teachers with either extrinsic or intrinsic motives could buffer stressful situations such as concentrated assessment periods, only males with intrinsic motives could do the same. This is in part, explained by the additional stressors males are confronted with, such as attitudinal factors and few male peers, which in turn places them at a higher risk of attrition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source Kim and Cho (2014), Severeins and Dam (2012), Thorpe et al. (2018), Vansteenkiste et al. (2006) and Weiss et al. (2018)

Fig. 2

Notes

  1. Figure 1 indicates there are 2764 females and 33 males over this period. However, in 2014 one female was input into the system as male.

  2. At the time these data were accessed (30/1/2019) from 2015 to 2018 many students had not been enrolled for the full duration of the course (4 years) hence these later years were not used in this calculation.

References

  • Allen, P., Bennett, K., & Heritage, B. (2019). SPSS statistics: A practical guide (4th ed.). South Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority. Retrieved March 29, 2019, from https://www.acecqa.gov.au/qualification-requirements/additional-staffing-requirement-1-january-2020.

  • Australian Broadcasting Commission News. (2018). Labor to fund three-year-old preschoolers in $1.75 billion pledge if elected. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-04/labor-to-fund-3yo-preschoolers-if-elected/10336718.. Accessed 7 April 2019.

  • Bedel, E. F. (2016). Exploring academic motivation, academic self-efficacy and attitudes toward teaching in pre-service early childhood education teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(1), 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, C., & Lawson, C. (2017). The problem of student attrition in higher education: An alternative perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.117171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhana, D., & Moosa, S. (2016). Failing to attract males in foundation phase teaching: An issue of masculinities. Gender and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1105934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Børve, H. E. (2017). Men in kindergartens: Work culture and gender. Early Child Development and Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1154853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, D. (2014). Men who teach young children: International perspectives. London: Institute of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouse, C. H., Basch, C. E., LeBlanc, M., McKnight, K. R., & Lei, T. (2010). College students' academic motivation: Differences by gender, class, and source of payment. College Quarterly, 13(1), n1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Frenchs Forest: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1057–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 627–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidevald, C., Bergström, H., & Broström, A. W. (2018). Maneuvering suspicions of being a potential pedophile: Experiences of male ECEC-workers in Sweden. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1463907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A., Szalkowicz, G., & Luckman, M. (2017). The re-recruitment of students who have withdrawn from Australian higher education. Report for the Australian Government Department of Education and Training. Melbourne: Centre for Higher Education Equity and Diversity Research, La Trobe University.

  • Higher Education Academy. (2011). Male access and success in higher education. Heslington: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Cho, Y. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ motivation, sense of teaching efficacy, and expectation of reality shock. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.8955999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, G. (2018). Retention in a bachelor of education (Early childhood studies) course: students say why they stay and others leave. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(4), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1455645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClymont, J. (2018). Men at work. Rattler, 124, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, I., Berry, A., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2017). Who wants to become a teacher? Typology of student-teachers’ commitment to teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(4), 444–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyens, D., Donche, V., Coertjens, L., van Daal, T., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). The directional links between students’ academic motivation and social integration during the first year of higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(1), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, M. (2018). Why is there a shortage of male educators? Educa. Retrieved from https://www.geteduca.com/blog/male-early-childhood-educators-shortage/.

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severeins, S., & ten Dam, G. (2012). Leaving college: A gender comparison in male and female-dominated programs. Research in Higher Education, 53, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statisisk sentralbyrå. (2018). Retrieved 4 April 2018, from https://www.ssb.no/en/utdanning/statistikker/barnehager.

  • Tennhoff, W., Nentwich, J. C., & Vogt, F. (2015). Doing gender and professionalism: Exploring the intersectionalities of gender and professionalization in early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(3), 340–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, K., Sullivan, V., Jansen, E., McDonald, P., Sumsion, J., & Irvinee, S. (2018). A man in the centre: Inclusion and contribution of male educators in early childhood education and care teaching teams. Early Child Development and Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1501564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., & Marsicano, G. (2014). Academic motivation predicts educational attainment: Does gender make a difference? Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vendrell, R., Capdevila, R., Dalmau, M., Geis, A., & Ciller, L. (2014). Descriptive study on gender equity in early childhood education in Catalonia, Spain. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(7), 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S., Syring, M., Keller-Schneider, M., Hellsten, M., Kiel, E. (2018). Career choice motives of early childhood educators: A cross-country comparisons of four European countries. Comparative and International Education, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918807035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth, U. G. (2015). Why do men choose to become pedagogues? A profession continuously in pursuit of male colleagues. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2015.1043813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. E. (2014). Gender balance in early childhood education: Reasons for the lack of male involvement, encouraging men into early childhood teaching, and the impact on children, families, colleagues and the early childhood sector. Practitioner Researcher, 3(3), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge the preservice teachers who gave up their time for this research. Their contributions are greatly valued. I would also like to acknowledge Edith Cowan University for the Teaching and Learning grant that enabled the successful completion of the first study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian Kirk.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

These studies were approved ethics by Edith Cowan University Research Ethics committee.

Informed consent

All participants gave informed consent to participate in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirk, G. Gender differences in experiences and motivation in a Bachelor of Education (Early Childhood Studies) course: Can these explain higher male attrition rates?. Aust. Educ. Res. 47, 873–892 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00374-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00374-8

Keywords

Navigation