Advertisement

The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 589–605 | Cite as

Thinking dispositions as a resource for resilience in the gritty reality of learning to teach

  • Amanda McGrawEmail author
  • Sharon McDonough
Article

Abstract

While there is agreement that dispositions and resilience enable teachers to negotiate the complexities of teaching, how we support pre-service teachers (PSTs) to activate and understand the nature of dispositions and resilience is less clear. This narrative inquiry, conducted at a regional university in Australia, examines ways thinking dispositions act as personal resources to enable PSTs to develop resilience and negotiate the reality of teaching. In this paper, we examine a teaching and learning experience in an initial teacher education program where PSTs engage with complexities associated with planning, teaching and assessment. Drawing from semi-structured interviews, we construct and examine PSTs’ narratives and identify the foundational influence of people-centred thinking. We also identify the central role of reflective and strategic thinking in enabling resilience. Finally, we argue that school/university partnership initiatives in teacher education provide opportunities to focus on dispositions associated with resilience.

Keywords

Dispositions Resilience Initial teacher education Vignettes 

Notes

References

  1. Arnold, J., Edwards, T., Hooley, N., & Williams, J. (2013). Site-based teacher education for enhanced community knowledge and culture: Creating the conditions for ‘philosophical project knowledge’. Australian Educational Researcher, 40(1), 61–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0070-z.Google Scholar
  2. Arnstine, D. (1967). Philosophy of education: Learning and schooling. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  3. Baggio, J. A., Brown, K., & Hellebrandt, D. (2015). Boundary object or bridging concept? A citation network analysis of resilience. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 2.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07484-200202.Google Scholar
  4. Bair, M. A. (2017). Identifying dispositions that matter: Reading for consensus using a Delphi Study. The Teacher Educator, 52(3), 222–234.Google Scholar
  5. Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, D. (2005). Developing dispositions for teaching: Teacher education programs as moral communities of practice. The New Educator, 1(2), 81–100.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, D. (2012). Examining the development of dispositions for ambitious teaching: One teacher candidate’s journey. The New Educator, 8(1), 38–64.Google Scholar
  9. Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Grudnoff, L., Ludlow, L., Haigh, M., & Hill, M. (2014). When complexity theory meets critical realism: A platform for research on initial teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, Winter, 41, 105–122.Google Scholar
  10. Cornu, R. (2013). Building early career teacher resilience: The role of relationships. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 1.  https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n4.4.Google Scholar
  11. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Day, C., & Gu, C. (2014). Response to Margolis, Hodge and Alexandrou: Misrepresentations of teacher resilience and hope. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(4), 409–412.  https://doi.org/10.1080/026027476.2014.948707.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  14. Dottin, E. S. (2009). Professional judgement and disposition in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 83–88.Google Scholar
  15. Ellis, C., & Flaherty, M. G. (1992). An agenda for the interpretation of lived experience. In C. Ellis & M. G. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 1–13). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Ely, (2007). In-forming re-presentations. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 567–598). California: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Entwistle, N. (2012). The quality of learning at university: Integrative understanding and distinctive ways of thinking. In J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 15–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Eren, A. (2014). Uncovering the links between prospective teachers’ personal responsibility, academic optimism, hope, and emotions about teaching: A mediation analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 17(1), 73–104.Google Scholar
  20. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Schussler, D. (2010). Defining, developing, and assessing dispositions: A cross-case analysis. In P. C. Murrell Jr., M. E. Diez, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. L. Schussler (Eds.), Teaching as a moral practice. Defining, developing, and assessing professional dispositions in teacher education (pp. 177–201). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fitzgerald, T., & Knipe, S. (2016). Policy reform: Testing times for teacher education in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(4), 358–369.Google Scholar
  22. Goodson, I. F., & Gill, S. R. (2011). Narrative pedagogy: Life history and learning. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  23. Grant-Smith, D., Gillet-Swan, J., & Chapman, R. (2017). WIL Wellbeing: Exploring the impacts of unpaid practicum on student wellbeing. Report submitted to the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Curtin University, Perth.Google Scholar
  24. Gu, Q. (2018). (Re)conceptualising teacher resilience: A social-ecological approach to understanding teachers’ professional worlds. In M. Wosnitza, F. Peixoto, S. Beltman, & C. F. Mansfield (Eds.), Resilience in education: Concepts, contexts and connections (pp. 13–33). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1302–1316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.006.Google Scholar
  26. Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2011). Challenges to teacher resilience: Conditions count. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 22–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.623152.Google Scholar
  27. Hazel, G. (2018). Finding a place for resilience in teacher preparation. In M. Wosnitza, F. Peixoto, S. Beltman, & C. F. Mansfield (Eds.), Resilience in education: Concepts, contexts and connections (pp. 221–235). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Howard, S., & Johnson, B. (2004). Resilient teachers: Resisting stress and burnout. Social Psychology of Education, 7(4), 399–420.Google Scholar
  29. Hunter, P. (2012). Using vignettes as self-reflexivity in narrative research of problematized History pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 10(1), 90–102.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, B., & Down, B. (2013). Critically re-conceptualising early career teacher resilience. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(5), 703–715.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.728365.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, L., & Reiman, A. (2007). Beginning teacher disposition: Examining the moral/ethical domain. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 676–687.Google Scholar
  32. Jordan, J. (2006). Relational resilience in girls. In S. Goldstein & R. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 73–86). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Kim, J. H., & Zimmerman, A. (2017). Bildung, Bildungsroman, and the cultivation of teacher dispositions. The Teacher Educator, 52(2), 235–249.Google Scholar
  34. Le Cornu, R. (2009). Building resilience in pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 717–723.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.016.Google Scholar
  35. Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidence informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 77–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.016.Google Scholar
  36. Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Price, A., & McConney, A. (2012). “Don’t sweat the small stuff”: Understanding teacher resilience at the chalkface. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 357–367.Google Scholar
  37. Mansfield, C. F., Ebersohn, L., Beltman, S., & Loots, T. (2018). Great Southern Lands: Making space for teacher resilience in South Africa and Australian. In M. Wosnitza, F. Peixoto, S. Beltman, & C. F. Mansfield (Eds.), Resilience in education: Concepts, contexts and connections (pp. 53–71). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. McGraw, A., Dresden, J., Gilbertson, E., & Baker, M. (2017). Site-based teacher education as a context for attending to the complexity and person-centred nature of teaching and learning: A narrative inquiry involving teacher educators from Australia and the United States. In J. Nuttall, A. Kostogriz, M. Jones, & J. Martin (Eds.), Teacher education policy and practice—Evidence of impact, impact of evidence (pp. 51–65). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. McGraw, A., McDonough, S., Wines, C., & O’Loughlan, C. (2016). Activating teaching dispositions in carefully constructed contexts: Examining the impact of classroom intensives. In R. Brandenburg, S. McDonough, J. Burke, & S. White (Eds.), Teacher education: Innovation, intervention and impact. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. McKay, L., & Barton, G. (2018). Exploring how arts-based reflection can support teachers resilience and wellbeing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 356–365.Google Scholar
  41. Noddings, N. (1986). Fidelity in teaching, teacher education, and research for teaching. Harvard University Review, 56(4), 496–510.Google Scholar
  42. Notar, C. E., Riley, G. W., Taylor, P. W., Thornburg, R. A., & Cargill, R. L. (2009). Dispositions: ability and assessment. International Journal of Education, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
  43. Perkins, D. N. (1995). Outsmarting IQ. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  44. Perkins, D. N., & Ritchhart, R. (2004). When is good thinking? In D. Y. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 351–384). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Pickering, L., & Kara, H. (2017). Presenting and representing others: Towards an ethics of engagement. International Journal of Social Research Methodology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1287875.Google Scholar
  46. Pooley, J. A., & Cohen, L. (2010). Resilience: A definition in context. The Australian Community Psychologist, 22(1), 30–37.Google Scholar
  47. Prendergast, M. (2009). The phenomena of poetry in research: “Poem is what?” Poetic Inquiry in Qualitative Social Science Research. In M. Prendergast, C. Leggo, & P. Sameshima (Eds.), Poetic inquiry: Vibrant voices in the social sciences (p. xix-3). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  48. Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, and how to get it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  49. Schussler, D. L. (2006). Defining dispositions: Wading through murky waters. The Teacher Educator, 41(4), 251–268.Google Scholar
  50. Stooksberry, L. M., Schussler, D. L., & Bercaw, L. A. (2009). Conceptualising dispositions: Intellectual, cultural, and moral domains of teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 719–736.Google Scholar
  51. Sumison, J. (2004). Early childhood teachers’ constructions of their resilience and thriving: A continuing investigation. International Journal of Early Years Education, 12(3), 275–290.Google Scholar
  52. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group. (2015). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra: Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group.Google Scholar
  53. Thomson, K. E., da Silva, R., Draper, P., Gilmore, A., Majury, N., O’Connor, K., et al. (2017). Student voice in work integrated learning scholarship: A review of teacher education and geographical sciences. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  54. Thornton, H. (2006). Dispositions in action. Do dispositions make a difference in practice? Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(2), 53–68.Google Scholar
  55. Tishman, S. (1994). Thinking dispositions and intellectual character. Paper presented at the 1994 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 4–8: New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  56. Webster, D., & Rivers, N. (2018). Resisting resilience: Disrupting discourses of self-efficacy. Pedagogy, Culture and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2018.1534261.Google Scholar
  57. Young, A., & Wilkins, E. (2008). Dispositional statements on student teacher evaluation instruments: Commonalities across institutions. The Teacher Educator, 43, 198–215.Google Scholar
  58. Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 376–382.Google Scholar
  59. Zeichner, K. (2014). The struggle for the soul of teaching and teacher education in the USA. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 551–568.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationFederation University AustraliaMt HelenAustralia

Personalised recommendations