Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How do male primary teachers negotiate expectations to perform gendered roles in their schools?

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary schools are dynamic environments where teachers take on multiple roles, often simultaneously, to help promote high-quality learning and meet the various needs of their students. Within the primary school context both female and male teachers are required to perform multiple roles; however, these roles are often socially constructed based on gender. Traditionally, primary schools in countries such as Australia, New Zealand and the United States have a high proportion of female teachers. Despite their minority status, research has noted that male primary teachers in the minority are often expected to take primary responsibility for roles such as disciplinarian, manual labourer, sports coach, and lead in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Role differentiation in primary schools often reflects broader societal gender constructions that are increasingly subjected to critical scrutiny. Yet that same level of scrutiny has not always been applied to educational contexts. It is the aim of this paper, therefore, to more fully examine how gendered roles influence the experience of male primary teachers and more specifically, how those teachers cope with the expectations placed on them because they are men. Understanding the sources and types of coping strategies will aid in the development of specific interventions to improve the retention of other male primary teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akın, U., Aydın, İ., Erdoğan, Ç., & Demirkasımoğlu, N. (2014). Emotional labor and burnout among Turkish primary school teachers. The Australian Educational Researcher,41(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashiedu, J., & Scott-Ladd, B. (2012). Understanding teacher attraction and retention drivers: addressing teacher shortages. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,37(11), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Schools Australia series. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research,15(2), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhana, D., & Moosa, S. (2016). Failing to attract males in foundation phase teaching: an issue of masculinities. Gender and Education,28(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). 2013 BLS current population study. http://www.menteach.org/resources/data_about_men_teachers.

  • Burn, E., & Pratt-Adams, S. (2015). Men teaching children 3–11: dismantling gender barriers. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol is too long: consider the brief cope. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine,4(1), 92–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology,61, 679–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2006). Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites. Public Administration Review,66(6), 837–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: rethinking the concept. Gender and Society,19(6), 829–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, V. (2016). The challenges faced by male primary teachers. Doctoral Thesis, University of Tasmania, Launceston.

  • Cruickshank, V. (2019). Male primary teachers’ fear and uncertainty surrounding physical contact. Education 3–13, 47(2), 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, V., Pedersen, S., Hill, A., & Callingham, R. (2015). Construction and validation of a survey instrument to determine the gender-related challenges faced by pre-service male primary teachers. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, V., Pedersen, S., Cooley, P., & Hill, A. (2018). Towards a measure of gender-related challenges faced by male primary teachers. Australian Journal of Education, 62(1), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, P. (2005). It’s just not a real bloke’s job: male teachers in the primary school. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,33(3), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, P. (2008). So what exactly do you want? What principals mean when they say ‘male role model’. Gender and Education,20(2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, T., & Newman, E. (2005). Just a knock back? Identity bruising on the route to becoming a male primary school teacher. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Z. (2005). Boys: getting it right: the ‘New’ disadvantaged or ‘disadvantage’ redefined? The Australian Educational Researcher,32(2), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keverline, S. (2003). Women’s persistence in non-traditional occupations: a study of federal law enforcement. (Doctoral Thesis), George Washington University: Washington.

  • Lent, R. W. (2012). Social cognitive career theory. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 115–146). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology,60(4), 557–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior,45(1), 79–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: a social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology,47(1), 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E., Butcher, J., and Donnan, P. (1999). Men in primary teaching: an endangered species? Paper presented at the AARE-NZARE Conference, Melbourne.

  • Major, J., & Santoro, N. (2014). ‘Sensible girls’ and ‘silly boys’: what do teachers need to know about gender? The Australian Educational Researcher,41(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2005). Motivating boys and motivating girls: does teacher gender really make a difference? Australian Journal of Education,49(3), 320–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W. (2008). Male teachers as role models: addressing issues of masculinity, pedagogy and the re-masculinisation of schooling. Curriculum Inquiry,38(2), 189–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, K., & Sinclair, M. (2013). More male primary-school teachers? Social benefits for boys and girls. Gender and Education,25(5), 531–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, K., & Van Bergen, P. (2017). Elementary teachers’ emotional and relational expressions when speaking about disruptive and well behaved students. Teaching and Teacher Education,67, 487–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., Haase, M., & Charlton, E. (2008). Being the ‘right’ kind of male teacher: the disciplining of John. Pedagogy, Culture and Society,16(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., Martino, W., & Lingard, B. (2004). Attracting, recruiting and retaining male teachers: policy issues in the male teacher debate. British Journal of the Sociology of Education,25(3), 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Johnson, E. R. (2016). Backlash against male elementary educators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,46(7), 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najmi, S., & Wegner, D. (2008). Thought suppression and psychopathology. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 447–459). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C., Cruickshank, V., Drummond, M., & Reid, D. (2019). Male primary school teachers, masculinity and identity work in regional Australia. Sport, Education and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1578207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland, Education. (2002). Male teachers’ strategy: Strategic plan for the attraction, recruitment and retention of male teachers in Queensland state schools 2002–2005. Brisbane: Queensland Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shnabel, N., Bar-Anan, Y., Kende, A., Bareket, O., & Lazar, Y. (2016). Help to perpetuate traditional gender roles: benevolent sexism increases engagement in dependency-oriented cross-gender helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,110(1), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, C. (2009). Failing to get men into primary teaching: a feminist critique. Journal of Education Policy,24(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, C. (2011). Men teachers and the ‘feminised’ primary school: a review of the literature. Educational Review,64(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2008). The experience of crossing over into pink collar work. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr Muller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M. (1996). Subject specialism, gender and status: the example of primary school mathematics. Education 3-13,24(3), 52–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, L. (2003). Gender, masculinity and the new economy. The Australian Educational Researcher,30(3), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society,23(1), 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2011). Dads as teachers: exploring duality of roles in the New Zealand context. The Journal of Men’s Studies,19(2), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vaughan Cruickshank.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cruickshank, V., Pedersen, S., Cooley, D. et al. How do male primary teachers negotiate expectations to perform gendered roles in their schools?. Aust. Educ. Res. 47, 307–322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00337-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00337-z

Keywords

Navigation