Advertisement

The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 233–251 | Cite as

Curriculum and learning in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education: A systematic review

  • N. HarrisonEmail author
  • C. Tennent
  • G. Vass
  • J. Guenther
  • K. Lowe
  • N. Moodie
Article

Abstract

One of the aims of a systematic literature review (SLR) is to test the weight of historical perception against the reality of research and practice. A second aim is to identify approaches to knowing in schools (defined as curriculum) that might help us to identify possibilities for improvement in Indigenous student engagement and achievement in Australian schools. Given that education is representational practice, this SLR explores various representations of the world and how these might be taught in schools in ways that support “successful learning” for Indigenous students. We focus on how the curriculum might allow for multiple stories to be told, and how it can support the multiplicity of social and cultural identities. The question for this segment of the SLR is, how does curriculum govern learning for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in Australia? A comprehensive search of the research literature produced over the period 2006–2017 highlights how the Australian government’s focus on numbers contrasts radically with the ways in which many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students and their parents conceptualise the goals of education.

Keywords

Curriculum Country Goals of education Success Knowledge Representation 

Notes

References

  1. Atweh, B., & Singh, P. (2011). The Australian curriculum: Continuing the national conversation. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Government (2018). Closing the Gap Prime Minister’s Report 2018. Retrieved from https://www.pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/indigenous-affairs/closing-gap-prime-ministers-report-2018
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bat, M., Kilgariff, C., & Doe, T. (2014). Indigenous tertiary education—we are all learning: Both-ways pedagogy in the Northern Territory of Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 871–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess, C., Tennent, C., Vass, G., Guenther, J. Lowe, K. & Moodie, N. (2019). A systematic review of pedagogies that support, engage and improve the educational outcomes of Aboriginal students. Australian Education Researcher Google Scholar
  6. Calderon, D. (2014). Speaking back to manifest destinies: A land education-based approach to critical curriculum inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deleuze, (1995). Negotiations 1972–1990, trans. M Joughin. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Disbray, S. (2016). Spaces for learning: Policy and practice for Indigenous languages in a remote context. Language and Education, 30(4), 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ewen, S., Mazel, O., & Knoche, D. (2012). Exposing the hidden curriculum influencing medical education on the health of Indigenous people in Australia and New Zealand: The role of the critical reflection tool. Academic Medicine, 87(2), 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ewing, B. (2012). Mathematics funds of knowledge: Sotmaute and Sermaute fish in a Torres Strait Islander community. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 52(1), 134–152.Google Scholar
  11. Ewing, B. (2014). Rich and purposeful mathematical knowledge of mothers and children in a Torres Strait Islander community. New York: Springerplus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fogarty, W.P. (2010). Learning through Country: Competing knowledge systems and place based pedagogy’ PhD thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  13. Goodson, I., & Crick, R. D. (2009). Curriculum as narration: tales from the children of the colonised. The Curriculum Journal, 20(3), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, B. (2018). Engaging curriculum: Bridging the curriculum theory and English education divide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Guenther, J., Bat, M., & Osborne, S. (2013). Red dirt thinking on educational disadvantage. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 42(2), 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guenther, J., Bat, M., & Osborne, S. (2014). Red dirt thinking on remote educational advantage. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 24(1), 54–67.Google Scholar
  17. Guenther, J., Disbray, S., & Osborne, S. (2015). Building on ‘Red Dirt’ perspectives: What counts as important for remote education? Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 44(2), 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guenther, J., Lowe, K., Burgess, C. Vass, G., Moodie, N. (2019). Factors contributing to educational outcomes for Indigenous students from remote communities: A systematic review. Australian Educational Researcher Google Scholar
  19. Guyula, Y. (2010). The story comes along, and the children are taught. Learning Communities, 2, 18–22.Google Scholar
  20. Hardy, I. (2016). ‘Capitalising’ on community? Understanding and critiquing instrumentalist approaches to Indigenous schooling. Oxford Review of Education, 42(6), 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrison, N. (2013). Country teaches: The significance of the local in the Australian history curriculum. Australian Journal of Education, 57(3), 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jorgensen, R., Grootenboer, P., Niesche, R., & Lerman, S. (2010). Challenges for teacher education: the mismatch between beliefs and practice in remote Indigenous contexts. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keddie, A. (2014). Indigenous representation and alternative schooling: Prioritising an epistemology of relationality. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Long, A. F., & Godfrey, M. (2004). An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(2), 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lowe, K., Tennent, C., Guenther, J., Harrison, N., Burgess, C. Moodie, N. & Vass, G. (2019). Aboriginal Voices’: An overview of the methodology applied in the systematic review of recent research across ten key areas of Australian Indigenous education. Australian Education Researcher Google Scholar
  26. Maxwell, J., Lowe, K., & Salter, P. (2018). The re-creation and resolution of the ‘problem’ of Indigenous education in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cross-curriculum priority. Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCarthy, H. (2010). Backboards to blackboards: rebounding from the margins: a critical auto/ethnographic study of the struggle for culturally-sensitive educational pathways for Aboriginal girls. PhD thesis.Google Scholar
  28. MCEETYA (2008). Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.artsedge.dca.wa.gov.au/australian-curriculum/Pages/OV-The-Melbourne-Declaration.aspx
  29. McKnight, A. (2016a). Meeting country and self to initiate an embodiment of knowledge: Embedding a process for Aboriginal perspectives. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 45(1), 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKnight, A. (2016b). Preservice teachers’ learning with Yuin Country: Becoming respectful teachers in Aboriginal education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McNamara, K. E., & McNamara, J. P. (2011). Using participatory action research to share knowledge of the local environment and climate change: Case study of Erub Island, Torres Strait. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 40, 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Curriculum Services (2012). What Works—the work program: success in remote schools: a research study of eleven improving remote schools (9781875864737). Retrieved from https://goo.gl/kY55mq
  33. Osberg, D. & Biesta, G. (2003). ‘Complexity, Representation and the Epistemology of Schooling’, in Proceedings of the 2003 Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference, October 16–18, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 83–89. Retrieved from www.complexityandeducation.ca.
  34. Osborne, S., & Guenther, J. (2013). Red dirt thinking on aspiration and success. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 42(2), 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rioux, J. (2015). Two-way strong: A study of vertebrates using Queensland Indigenous knowledges and Montessori Linnaean materials to engage Indigenous secondary school students PhD thesis 2015. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  37. Rioux, J., Ewing, B., & Coope, T. J. (2017). Embedding Aboriginal perspectives and knowledge in the biology curriculum: The little porky. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2017.12.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(12), 738–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharifian, F. Truscott, A., Konigsberg, P. Malcolm, I.G. & Collard, G. (2012). Western Australia. Dept of Education (2012). Understanding stories my way’: Aboriginal-English speaking students’ (mis)understanding of school literacy materials in Australian English. Leederville WA: Western Australia. Dept of Education, 2012. Western Australia. Dept of EducationGoogle Scholar
  40. Sofa, B.M (2014). Promoting equitable and alternative early learning opportunities through Outdoor learning: A case study of the Bush School Project in Western Australia. PhD Murdoch WA: Murdoch University.Google Scholar
  41. Treacy, K., Frid, S., & Jacob, L. (2014). Starting points and pathways in Aboriginal students’ learning of number: Recognising different world views. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Verran, H. (2010). On being a ‘language and culture’ learner in a Yolngu world. Learning Communities, 2, 84–90.Google Scholar
  43. Verran, H. (2013). The dead as participants: Challenged by the Yolngu Aboriginal child learner at Gä ga. Learning Communities, 12, 35–39.Google Scholar
  44. Weuffen, S., Cahir, F., & Zeegers, M. (2016). What’s in a Name?: Exploring the Implications of Eurocentric (Re) naming Practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Nomenclature in Australian Education Practices. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 45(2), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitehouse, H. W., Lui, F., Sellwood, J., Barrett, M. J., & Chigeza, P. (2014). Sea Country: navigating Indigenous and colonial ontologies in Australian environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yunkaporta T. (2009). Aboriginal pedagogies at the cultural interface, PhD thesis, Townsville Qld: James Cook University.Google Scholar
  47. Yunkaporta, T., & McGinty, S. (2009). Reclaiming Aboriginal knowledge at the cultural interface. The Australian Educational Researcher, 36(2), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Griffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary EducationBatchelorAustralia
  5. 5.University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations