Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding school engagement in and with research

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are increasing calls within Australia and internationally for schools to be research-engaged, for teaching to be research-rich and for researchers to engage with end-users. Such aspirations raise important questions about whether and how Australian schools are engaging in and with research. This paper reports on an empirical study, Catholic Education Melbourne’s Understanding School Engagement in Research project, which sought to better understand research engagement amongst 67 Catholic schools in Melbourne. Drawing on the findings of this project, coupled with a subsequent analysis of wider international literature, this paper shows how schools are selective about their research involvement; are discerning about what the research is on and how it is conducted; access research in indirect and informal ways; value research more than they use it; and need much more than research access. The paper concludes by synthesising these five themes into a conceptual framework for understanding and improving school research engagement, and outlining the implications for research organisations, schools and jurisdictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anwaruddin, S. M. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with educational research: Toward a conceptual framework for locally-based interpretive communities. Education Policy Analysis Archives,23(40), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, AITSL. (2014). Australian professional standard for principals and the leadership profiles. Melbourne: AITSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Research Council, ARC. (2016). Engagement and impact assessment consultation paper. Canberra: ARC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Research Council, ARC. (2017). Making a difference. Canberra: ARC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Befort, C., Lynch, R., James, R. L., Carroll, S. L., Nolleen, N., & Davis, A. (2008). Perceived barriers and benefits to research participation among school administrators. Journal of School Health,78(11), 581–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., Cordingley, P., Isham, C., & Davis, R. (2010). Report of professional practitioner use of research review: Practitioner engagement in and/or with research. Coventry: CUREE, GTCE, LSIS & NTRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, B. J., & Saha, L., (2002/2005). The untested accusation: Principals, research knowledge, and policy making in schools. Wesipon: Ablex Publishing & Lanham.

  • Biddle, B. J., & Saha, L. J. (2006). How principals use research. Educational Leadership,March, 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielick, S. (2017). Surveys and questionnaires. In D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith Smith & L. Suter (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research (pp. 640–658). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory,57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaz, A., Davies, H., Fraser, A., & Nutley, S. (Forthcoming, 2019). What works now? Evidence-informed policy and practice revisited. Bristol: The Policy Press

  • Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching,43(4), 391–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Educational Research Association (BERA) & Royal Society for the Encouragement of the Arts, Manufacturing and Commerce (RSA). (2014). Research and the teaching profession: Building the capacity for a self-improving education system. London: BERA/RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (Ed.). (2015). Leading the use of research and evidence in schools. London: Institute of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., Daly, A., & Liou, Y. (2016). Improving trust, improving schools: Findings from a social network analysis of 43 primary schools in England. Journal of Professional Capital and Community,1(1), 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Zhang, D. (2016). How can school leaders establish evidence-informed schools: An analysis of the effectiveness of potential school policy levers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,45(3), 382–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, T. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with research texts: Beyond instrumental, conceptual or strategic use. Journal of Education for Teaching,41(5), 478–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners? The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research,56, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C., & Penuel, W. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics and open questions. Educational Researcher,45(1), 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2013). Research-brokering organizations in education across Canada: A response to evidence-based policy-making and practice initiatives. In S. P. Young (Ed.), Evidence-based policy-making in Canada: A multidisciplinary look at how evidence and knowledge shape Canadian public policy (pp. 67–92). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P. (2015). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxford Review of Education,41(2), 234–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P., Wilson, J, Seddon, K., & Thomas, F. (2002). Encouraging discerning research involvement by schools and developing CPD co-ordinators: The contribution of the National Teacher Research Panel. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association Conference, Devon.

  • Dagenais, C., Lysenko, L., Abramai, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Ramde, J., & Janosz, M. (2012). Use of research-based information by school practitioners and determinants of use: A review of empirical research. Evidence & Policy,8(3), 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies,47(2), 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training, DET Victoria. (2015). The education state: School improvement initiatives. Melbourne: DET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimmock, C. (2016). Conceptualising the research-practice-professional development nexus: Mobilising schools as ‘research-engaged’ professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education,42(1), 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figgis, J., Zubrick, A., Butorac, A., & Alderson, A. (2000). Backtracking practice and policies to research. In Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, The Impact of Educational Research. Canberra: DETYA.

  • Finnigan, K. S., & Daly, A. (Eds.). (2014). Using research evidence in education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.

  • Hammersley, M. (2004). Some questions about evidence-based practice in education. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 133–149). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects (teacher training agency annual lectures 1996). London: Teacher Training Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, H. (2010). Blurring the boundaries: Connecting research, practice and professional learning. Cambridge Journal of Education,40(3), 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal,27, 363–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1993). Linking the practitioner and research communities for school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,4(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M., & Levinson, N. (1984). An empirical model for exchanging educational knowledge between universities and schools. International Review of Education,30(4), 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ion, G., & Iucu, R. (2014). Professionals’ perceptions about the use of research in educational practice. European Journal of Higher Education,4(4), 334–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judkins, M., Stacey, O., McCrone, T., & Inniss, M. (2014). Teachers’ use of research evidence: A case study of United Learning schools. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawulich, B. (2017). Coding and analyzing qualitative data. In D. Wyse, N. Selwyn, E. Smith Smith & L. Suter (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE handbook of educational research (pp. 769–790). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, T. J., Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., & Fitzgerald, S. (2002). Teacher perceptions of the trustworthiness, usability and accessibility of information from different sources. Remedial and Special Education,23(1), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2004). Making research count more. Education Policy Archives, 12(56), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B., Cooper, A., Arjomand, S., & Thompson, K. (2011). Can simple interventions increase research use in secondary schools? Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy,126, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2013). The impact of research on education policy in an era of evidence-based policy. Critical Studies in Education,54(2), 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2015). Think Tanks, ‘policy experts’ and ‘ideas for’ education policy making in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher,43, 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysenko, L. V., Abramai, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Dagenais, C., & Janosz, M. (2014). Educational research in educational practice: Predictors of use. Canadian Journal of Education,37(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, I. A., London, R. A., & Strobel, K. R. (2015). Reinventing the role of the university researcher. Educational Researcher,44(1), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., & O’Beirne, C. (2014). Using evidence in the classroom: What works and why?. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Government. (2017). School excellence framework. Sydney: NSW Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, OECD. (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., Briggs, D. C., Davidson, K. L, Herlihy, C., Sherer, D., Hill, H. C., Farrell, C. C., & Allen, A. (2016). Findings from a national survey of research use among school and district leaders (Technical Report No. 1). Boulder, CO: National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.

  • Prendergast, S. (2017). Understanding school engagement in research (USER) project. Melbourne: Catholic Education Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. (2015). Teachers and school research practices: The gaps between the values and practices of teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching,41(5), 464–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2016). National Education Evidence Base, Report no. 80. Canberra: Productivity Commission

  • Reid, A. (2016). The use and abuse of research in the public domain. Australian Educational Researcher,43, 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickinson, M. (2005). Practitioners’ use of research. London: National Educational Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickinson, M., de Bruin, K., Walsh, L., & Hall, M. (2017). What can evidence-use in practice learn from evidence-use in policy? Educational Research,59(2), 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S., & McNeish, D. (2013). School leadership evidence review: Using research evidence to support school improvement. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, J. (2013). Evidence for the frontline. London: Alliance for Useful Evidence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, S., White, S., Nuttall, J., Mills, M., Down, B., Woods, A. & Bussey, K. (2017). A Research-rich teaching profession: Insights from the field. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Canberra.

  • St. Clair, R., Chen, C., & Taylor, L. (2003). How adult literacy practitioners use research. Occasional Research Paper 2. College Station: Texas Centre for Adult Literacy and Learning.

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teh, L., Hogan, D., & Dimmock, C. (2013). Knowledge mobilization and utilisation in the Singapore education system: The nexus between researchers, policy makers and practitioners. In B. Levin, J. Qi, H. Edelstein, & J. Sohn (Eds.), The impact of research in education: An international perspective (pp. 41–63). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todman, J., Crombie, I., & Keighren, J. (1990). Protracted intrusive research in schools: Why us? Educational Studies,16(2), 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V., & Nutley, S. (2014). Building the infrastructure to improve the use and usefulness of research in education. In K. S. Finnigan & A. J. Daly (Eds.), Using research evidence in education (pp. 163–175). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal,36(2), 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2016). Teacher education research and education policymakers: An Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching,42(2), 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D., & Coles, L. (2007). Teachers’ approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective. Educational Research,49(2), 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Catholic Education Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Shani Prendergast

  2. Monash University Faculty of Education, Melbourne, Australia

    Mark Rickinson

Authors
  1. Shani Prendergast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Rickinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Rickinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prendergast, S., Rickinson, M. Understanding school engagement in and with research. Aust. Educ. Res. 46, 17–39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0292-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0292-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation