Personal Best (PB) goal-setting enhances arithmetical problem-solving
Personal Best (PB) goals are defined as specific, challenging, and competitively self-referenced goals involving a level of performance or effort that meets or exceeds an individual’s previous best. Much of the available research underpinning arguments for PB goal-setting is self-report-based; thus, the causal effect of PB goals on learning outcomes remains in question. The present experiment examined the impact of PB goal-setting (against a no-goal condition) on 68 Year 5 and 6 schoolchildren’s problem-solving during an arithmetic fluency-building activity, SuperSpeed Math. Equivalence of the two conditions was established across a range of prior ability and self-report motivational variables, including prior mathematical ability; Personal Best, Mastery, and Performance goal orientations at the individual and classroom level; mathematics self-concept; and valuing of and interest in mathematics. Controlling for initial problem-solving performance, students who set PB goals in subsequent rounds showed a small but reliable advantage over students in the control condition. These results suggest PB goals may provide a way for students to experience both challenge and success in a range of classroom activities. Suggestions for future research based on these initial findings are made.
KeywordsGoal setting Personal Best (PB) goals Mathematics Problem-solving
The present study was supported by Discovery Research Project Grant DP140104294.
- Alschuler, A. S. (1969). The effects of classroom structure on achievement motivation and academic performance. Educational Technology, IX, 19–24.Google Scholar
- Biffle, C. (2007a). SuperSpeed math. Yucaipa: Crafton Hills College.Google Scholar
- Biffle, C. (2007b). SuperSpeed letters and phonics. Yucaipa: Crafton Hills College.Google Scholar
- Boomsma, A., & Herzog, W. (2013). R function swain: Correcting structural equation model t-statistics and indexes under small-sample and/or large-model conditions. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://www.ppsw.rug.nl/~boomsma/swain.pdf.
- Bratina, T. A., & Krudwig, K. M. (2003). Get it right and get it fast! Building automaticity to strengthen mathematical proficiency. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 25, 47–63.Google Scholar
- Edgington, E., & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization tests. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Graham, J. W., & Hoffer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
- Keselman, H. J., Othman, A.R., & Wilcox, R.R. (2013). Preliminary testing for normality: Is this a good practice? Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 12(2), 2. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol12/iss2/2
- Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Latham, E. A., & Locke, G. P. (2013). Goal setting theory, 1990. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 3–15). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Liem, G. A. D., Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., Stone, B., & Herett, M. (2012). Personal best goals and academic and social functioning: A longitudinal perspective. Learning and Instruction, 22, 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marsh, H. W. (1990). Self description questionnaire—I (SDQ I). Manual. Macarthur, NSW. Australia: University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315–353). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, A. J. (2011b). The Motivation and Engagement Scale. Sydney, Australia: Lifelong Achievement Group.Google Scholar
- Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martin, A. J., Durksen, T. L., Williamson, D., Kiss, J., & Ginns, P. (2014). Personal Best (PB) goal setting and students’ motivation in science: A study of science valuing and aspirations. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2014.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Nordstokke, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). A new nonparametric test for equal variances. Psicologica, 31, 401–430.Google Scholar
- Nordstokke, D. W., Zumbo, B. D., Cairns, S .L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2011). The operating characteristics of the nonparametric Levene test for equal variances with assessment and evaluation data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 16. 84. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=16&n=5.
- Schmidt, F. L. (2013). The economic value of goal setting to employers. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 16–20). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., & Woodwark, M. (2013). Learning goals: A qualitative and quantitative review. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 195–212). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Swain, A.J. (1975). Analysis of parametric structures for variance matrices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Statistics, University of Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
- Tallmadge, G. A. (1977). The joint dissemination review panel ideabook. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education & US Office of Education.Google Scholar
- Williams, K. J. (2013). Goal setting in sports. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 375–396). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar